by saintal » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:54 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:56 pm
saintal wrote:Dont they play time on? Anyway, according to afl.com the game's over.
PM 12.6
SA 8.8
Rolfe with 4 for South. Cross the most touches with 19.
by blueandwhite » Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:21 pm
by westozfalcon » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:31 pm
by prowling panther » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:42 pm
by StrayDog » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:27 am
DOC wrote:No time on
by fish » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:34 am
by G » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:54 am
by fish » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:02 am
dittoG wrote:I've never rated South on or off the field during my lifespan BUT I want to congratulate them for having a serious crack at the Foxtel Cup.
This club is finally getting its act together in recent years and I think the Foxtel Cup wont harm their 2012 season one bit.
by Grahaml » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:13 am
G wrote:I've never rated South on or off the field during my lifespan BUT I want to congratulate them for having a serious crack at the Foxtel Cup.
This club is finally getting its act together in recent years and I think the Foxtel Cup wont harm their 2012 season one bit.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:52 am
by holden78 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:11 am
westozfalcon wrote:I was disappointed South couldn't get up as I was holding out hope of being able to watch them live over here in Perth in the semi-finals. It's a shame 'cos I reckon they'd beat Claremont.
Still, one can't really fault their effort in this comp against two powerhouse VFL sides at the 'G'.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:17 am
holden78 wrote:westozfalcon wrote:I was disappointed South couldn't get up as I was holding out hope of being able to watch them live over here in Perth in the semi-finals. It's a shame 'cos I reckon they'd beat Claremont.
Still, one can't really fault their effort in this comp against two powerhouse VFL sides at the 'G'.
You have to be on crack to say one can't really fault their effort, ffs they didn't bother to even put their best possible team on the park! Why bother in the first place heh? So that's all 3 SANFL teams that pulled up short in this "Rox Off" Cup, what a HUGE exercise in self flagellationSome clubs need to grow a pair of plums!
by heater31 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:19 am
holden78 wrote:westozfalcon wrote:I was disappointed South couldn't get up as I was holding out hope of being able to watch them live over here in Perth in the semi-finals. It's a shame 'cos I reckon they'd beat Claremont.
Still, one can't really fault their effort in this comp against two powerhouse VFL sides at the 'G'.
You have to be on crack to say one can't really fault their effort, ffs they didn't bother to even put their best possible team on the park! Why bother in the first place heh? So that's all 3 SANFL teams that pulled up short in this "Rox Off" Cup, what a HUGE exercise in self flagellationSome clubs need to grow a pair of plums!
by SDK » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:27 pm
by Gravel » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:11 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:27 pm
Gravel wrote:Gary Ayers said during the telescast that they rested 7-8 of their 'best players' - perhaps someone could confirm.
On TV Port Melbourne looked a big side, almost AFL size, and much bigger than all the current SANFL sides - any South fans who saw it live is that a fair assessment - thanks
by PhilH » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:17 pm
by heater31 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:24 pm
PhilH wrote:Captain John Baird certainly didn't play for the Boroughs.
They did rest some others as they had at least 7 reps in the VFL side that pounded Tasmania last months, and thus had not had a week off so far this season.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |