Hargraves to Port

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Hargraves to...?

Postby sus » Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:46 pm

Wedgie wrote:
sus wrote:The problem is not the physical mix, the problem is the personality mix.

Hargs and Waterhouse are mates and spent time together at the Dockers by memory so they might develop a good understanding between each other. Hargs would just take Paul Evans spot who may never play SANFL again due to his knees.
Cupido is an X Factor and may be the sort of player who may not fit in anywhere to tell the truth.

Harg's positives far outweigh his negatives and he'll bring some passion and comradrie to Port and their supporters.


Disagree! Waterhouse, Cupido, and Hargraves are all liabilities at SANFL level. Zero chance of success in the same forward line. Its not their social personaility Im talking about - its their football personalities. Who's mates with who and what understanding they may or may not have is immaterial. None of them have a defensive game, they're poor team players, all have a poor work ethic, all lack real fitness, and all are past their prime. Other clubs will be laughing and rubbing their hands together at this one. If this goes ahead Geniver has absolutely no idea and Port are going backwards fast!
User avatar
sus
Rookie
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:06 am
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Hargraves to...?

Postby JK » Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:04 pm

sus wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
sus wrote:The problem is not the physical mix, the problem is the personality mix.

Hargs and Waterhouse are mates and spent time together at the Dockers by memory so they might develop a good understanding between each other. Hargs would just take Paul Evans spot who may never play SANFL again due to his knees.
Cupido is an X Factor and may be the sort of player who may not fit in anywhere to tell the truth.

Harg's positives far outweigh his negatives and he'll bring some passion and comradrie to Port and their supporters.


Disagree! Waterhouse, Cupido, and Hargraves are all liabilities at SANFL level. Zero chance of success in the same forward line. Its not their social personaility Im talking about - its their football personalities. Who's mates with who and what understanding they may or may not have is immaterial. None of them have a defensive game, they're poor team players, all have a poor work ethic, all lack real fitness, and all are past their prime. Other clubs will be laughing and rubbing their hands together at this one. If this goes ahead Geniver has absolutely no idea and Port are going backwards fast!


I can see what you're saying Sus and don't disagree with you, but the other side would suggest that any opposition would require 3 top shelf defenders to shut them all down, and if even just 1 of them were to fire, the odds would greatly favour a Magpie victory ... I think the downside to it for PAMFC would be their condition throughout the year, ie, what would their legs be like come September and October?

Port have always been exceptional at producing their own talents, I wouldn't have thought a Port model for continual success would rely heavily on too many recruits.
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby BPBRB » Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:34 pm

With all due respect to Hargs (and he is a mate) he can only play at FF. His overhead marking power has diminished signifacantly over the last 18 months and there is no way he could play CHF. On the lead and lace out he is still dangerous but age and injury toll on his back/hammies and knees over the past seasons has seen him lose a lot of jumping ability and agility on the ground. Hargs missed 6 games this year and played about 4 or 5 carrying injuries. Hargs only played as much as he did this year in the league for North because first Alleway and then Weatherley suffered long term injuries plus Gill missed a number of games.

How Cupido, Waterhouse and Hargraves would go in the same fowd line will be one of the intriguing things come 2007 if it happens?. All 3 of them would hardly be described as having much of a defensive component to their individual (or the team) game plan. I'll take Gill, Alleway and Weatherley (plus one or two others about to be announced by North) ahead of Hargs, Cupido and Waterhouse if given a choice despite friendship loyalties etc.
BPBRB
 

Postby am Bays » Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:48 pm

BPBRB wrote: On the lead and lace out he is still dangerous but age and injury toll on his back/hammies and knees over the past seasons has seen him lose a lot of jumping ability and agility on the ground. Hargs missed 6 games this year and played about 4 or 5 carrying injuries. Hargs only played as much as he did this year in the league for North because first Alleway and then Weatherley suffered long term injuries plus Gill missed a number of games.



If anyone doubts what has been written here go look at some of Wedgies photo's of Hargraves kicking style and the collapsed support leg and reduced range of motion of the kicking leg about the knee, thereby reducing the power of the kick. This is due to tightening of teh hammies, in short a hamstring strain waiting to happen.

Congratulations Port you've recruited a hamstring strain prone player, time will tell but I reckon port may have recruited a once great player, who may turn out to be a dud in black and white.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19743
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 2124 times

Postby Macca19 » Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:39 pm

A Clive/Hargs/Cupido forward line is an interesting thought. Not sure what I think of it at this stage. As I said in a different thread, we will either belt teams next year or get belted ourselves. I can see a very frustrating year ahead for us if those two rumours come through.

We generally lack KPP depth at the moment. Thought we have some promising looking kids in the reserves, they are still 17-18 and probably need some more development. Three guys in particular in Taylor, Hall and Caterall look decent prospects but are a bit off yet. This is why the last few years weve gone after some talls as if we get a few injuries in the tall department we almost literally have noone to cover it.

If we get those two it means Morrison (if hes still there) can play in defence full time to cover the loss of Baird.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Postby Jimmy » Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:17 am

with those 3 down there, its certainly going to be interesting how it turns out...the potential for both upsides and downsides is huge. If clive can play in a FP, Hargs at FF and cupidoll on a flank, i think that would work ok depending on fitness and how well they work together. Certainly has the potential for many 6 pointers :!:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby mal » Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:17 am

If NA +SA didnt have to worry about salary caps
would Hargreaves + Cupido still be at thier respective clubs ?

The 3 gun forwards would be a liabilty, Waterhouse often burnt in the first
halfs of games this year before fitness + or injuries caught up with him.
With all due respect to the wonderful talents of Hargy + Cuipido, thier
aerobic capacity and endurance is suspect at best.
The combination might be effective early in the season, but later in the
season, particularly near finals they could be liabilities.

In any case the 3 will rarely be on the park at the one time as they will
miss games through the inevitable injuries.
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30201
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2107 times
Been liked: 2133 times

Postby Wedgie » Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:19 am

mal wrote:If NA +SA didnt have to worry about salary caps
would Hargreaves + Cupido still be at thier respective clubs ?


Dunno about Cupido but Hargraves getting cut had absolutely nothing to do with the salary cap.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Aerie » Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:31 am

Still no official mention of Hargraves going to Port? Would have thought it would have got a run in the article with Cupido, considering they quote Matthew Richardson and say Port are after him to strengthen their forward line and confirm Baird's departure.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Postby Wedgie » Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:36 am

Aerie wrote:Still no official mention of Hargraves going to Port? Would have thought it would have got a run in the article with Cupido, considering they quote Matthew Richardson and say Port are after him to strengthen their forward line and confirm Baird's departure.


There's quite a few signings at most clubs that have been that haven't been announced yet.
Some might have a couple of minor issues before the official signing on the line too and transfer fees, etc to work out.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Aerie » Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:53 am

Wedgie wrote:
Aerie wrote:Still no official mention of Hargraves going to Port? Would have thought it would have got a run in the article with Cupido, considering they quote Matthew Richardson and say Port are after him to strengthen their forward line and confirm Baird's departure.


There's quite a few signings at most clubs that have been that haven't been announced yet.
Some might have a couple of minor issues before the official signing on the line too and transfer fees, etc to work out.


So it's definitely a done deal then. I would have thought this would have been fairly big news as far as SANFL tranfers go and would have at least got a passing mention in an article. Perhaps they're saving it for an article in a few weeks time...
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Postby Wedgie » Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:58 am

Aerie wrote:So it's definitely a done deal then. I would have thought this would have been fairly big news as far as SANFL tranfers go and would have at least got a passing mention in an article. Perhaps they're saving it for an article in a few weeks time...


Nah, you misunderstand me, it hasn't been announced by the clubs officially yet hence why there's nothing in the papers.
More times than not you'll get the news 2 weeks earlier hear than the clubs announcements and 3 weeks earlier than the papers.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

strong mail

Postby dash61 » Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:36 pm

Strong mail today the hargie deal is signed for 2 years at 25K, the cupido deal is not set in concrete yet and may Morrison be going walkies and saying good bye
dash61
 

Re: strong mail

Postby bayman » Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:52 pm

dash61 wrote:Strong mail today the hargie deal is signed for 2 years at 25K, the cupido deal is not set in concrete yet and may Morrison be going walkies and saying good bye


would morrison then move to play in the same team as his mate ? (the mouse ?)
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby sydney-dog » Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:48 pm

Clive/Hargs/Cupido

looks like their is now three of them for "rock, bomb and scissors" to see who will chase

Port is spending some $$$
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: strong mail

Postby BPBRB » Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:01 pm

dash61 wrote:Strong mail today the hargie deal is signed for 2 years at 25K, the cupido deal is not set in concrete yet and may Morrison be going walkies and saying good bye


I also got told from a "very reliable" source that Morrison has departed. Port might to have a good look at who and how they recruit. Clearly the big fat cheque book approach isn't working? Gone from this year is Alvey, Bullen, Baird and now Morrison. Fair bit of salary cap space freed up there (assuming they were under it in the first place! :wink: ).
BPBRB
 

Re: strong mail

Postby Brad » Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:42 pm

BPBRB wrote:
dash61 wrote:Strong mail today the hargie deal is signed for 2 years at 25K, the cupido deal is not set in concrete yet and may Morrison be going walkies and saying good bye


I also got told from a "very reliable" source that Morrison has departed. Port might to have a good look at who and how they recruit. Clearly the big fat cheque book approach isn't working? Gone from this year is Alvey, Bullen, Baird and now Morrison. Fair bit of salary cap space freed up there (assuming they were under it in the first place! :wink: ).


A source from Port said Morrison wasn't interested in playing football and didn't take it seriously so im not surprised hes gone.
Brad
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: Ceduna
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Crystal Brook

Postby Barto » Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:51 pm

Wedgie wrote:
Rooster Chic wrote:Lovely? You mean, incredibly attractive AND lovely.. :wink:
Yeah, she's not a bad sort!;)


His ex isn't a bad sort either. But I wouldn't know anything about that.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Postby Barto » Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:04 pm

User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Postby CENTURION » Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:42 pm

3/4 time at Alberton is not "lemons" anymore, it's "1/4 pounders"!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |