Mini League Scrapped!

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby Wedgie » Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:22 pm

redandblack wrote:Perhaps you should be asking your own Club's GM's about this, as I think it might have been their decision, rather than the SANFL management. I also believe Coke haven't withdrawn any sponsorship money, just asked for it to be redirected.


Cheers for that r&b, I'll hopefully be catching up with Glenn Elliott tonight and will put the question to him.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Jimmy » Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:24 pm

id like to hear what sort of reason the clubs give if it is true some of them are behind it????

maybe they want to scrap the ML for something better in place??? :roll:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby FlyingHigh » Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:01 pm

Yeah, I understand Diss, just think it sux.

Perhaps we should approach Quit SA?
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4911
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Postby Thiele » Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:45 pm

It is not going to be the same really enjoyed playing mini league and watching it a few times :)
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 180 times
Been liked: 115 times

Postby Wedgie » Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:49 pm

Anyone wanting to sponsor it just needs to fork out 40k per year.
Some of the clubs didn't see the value in spending 40k per year on 40 kids plus parents that usually rock up for the mini league and then leave straight after it.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby Ian » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:16 pm

giffo wrote: After many years of watching (and hoping one of the Yr 6/7 players can't make it), Giffo jnr probably would've got a game next year as he will be in Yr 6.


Ian Jnr got to play his 1st (and now last :evil: ) mini league game this year, Eagles V Glenelg @ Thebby, he was looking forward to what should have been his last, and Giffo Jnrs 1st game in 2007. There is a lot of not so happy kids out there now.

Surely if the coke sponsership was redirected away from mini league, someone elses could have been redirected to the mini league.
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Postby spell_check » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:50 pm

Wedgie wrote:Anyone wanting to sponsor it just needs to fork out 40k per year.
Some of the clubs didn't see the value in spending 40k per year on 40 kids plus parents that usually rock up for the mini league and then leave straight after it.


So what if parents leave straight after? Some of them won't. "See the value" Does any of the clubs currently pay any money towards mini league? It's only $4,444 each club if nothing is already spent on it.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby Wedgie » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:52 pm

spell_check wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Anyone wanting to sponsor it just needs to fork out 40k per year.
Some of the clubs didn't see the value in spending 40k per year on 40 kids plus parents that usually rock up for the mini league and then leave straight after it.


So what if parents leave straight after? Some of them won't. "See the value" Does any of the clubs currently pay any money towards mini league? It's only $4,444 each club if nothing is already spent on it.


Hey, dont ask me, Im just conveying the consensus of the clubs on (not all clubs).
The other train of thought was kids only get 3 mins to have a kick at the quarter time breaks and will enjoy having a longer kick at half time.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby spell_check » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:54 pm

ANother thing - where are the SANFL going to come up with the extra 80 or so in attendance figures that will be lost each game?
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby spell_check » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:57 pm

Wedgie wrote:
spell_check wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Anyone wanting to sponsor it just needs to fork out 40k per year.
Some of the clubs didn't see the value in spending 40k per year on 40 kids plus parents that usually rock up for the mini league and then leave straight after it.


So what if parents leave straight after? Some of them won't. "See the value" Does any of the clubs currently pay any money towards mini league? It's only $4,444 each club if nothing is already spent on it.


Hey, dont ask me, Im just conveying the consensus of the clubs on (not all clubs).
The other train of thought was kids only get 3 mins to have a kick at the quarter time breaks and will enjoy having a longer kick at half time.


I know that. :)

Put it this way - 7200 in crowd figures for next year will be lost.

And also, there is that suggestion again - have half of the oval for the Mini League, half for kick to kick.

Just because some clubs cbf'ed with this, doesn't mean we can't take the matter further.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby Jimmy » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:59 am

poor effort from those clubs who are against it...

i really cant see how half the oval cant be split up for ML and having a kick???

it cant be that hard to figure out the logistics of it. :roll:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby Wedgie » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:43 am

I don't think any clubs were against it as it was in its former existence, the 40k was the major factor.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby giffo » Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:18 pm

Obviously all too hard for the boys in the offices at AAMI. What with all that corporate stuff they have to organize for their two beloved franchises, they obviously have no time for the "REAL SANFL" teams and competition.
giffo
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:18 am
Location: Land of bewilderment
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 34 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |