*Scottdog wrote: those Port cheersquad members trying to poke our players with their poles.

by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:46 pm
*Scottdog wrote: those Port cheersquad members trying to poke our players with their poles.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:55 pm
PortAdelaideProud wrote:You know what, screw this. I'm not going to the Centrals game at Elizabeth. It's my 21st and I have a plane to catch 6am the next morning.
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:58 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:your young, i've had nights where im out til 1am, but still at the airport before 5:30am.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by giffo » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:58 pm
by THE CHIEF » Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:59 pm
Scottdog wrote:Atleast at this point we are just fighting on the computer,I seem to recall that same incident where those Port cheersquad members trying to poke our players with their poles.
by doggies4eva » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:15 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:19 pm
doggies4eva wrote:What a laugh this all is. I can remember times in the 70s as an early teenager when there was real trouble at the games.
These days it's a family affair with the odd pissed idiot who raises about 1,000 posts about very little.
Meanwhile we have PAP pooping his pants at 21 about problems he has largeley created himself. What a wimp!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:24 pm
Wedgie wrote:
luckily for 8 club's supporters they've never been there when their team has beaten Central under lights.
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:25 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Wedgie wrote:
luckily for 8 club's supporters they've never been there when their team has beaten Central under lights.
7.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:30 pm
Wedgie wrote:Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Wedgie wrote:
luckily for 8 club's supporters they've never been there when their team has beaten Central under lights.
7.
7?
Who was the other club that has beaten Central under lights at Elizabeth in a league game beside North?
by am Bays » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:31 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:31 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Centrals are very good but i dont think they could defeat themselves.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:33 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Got him, Yes!!!!!!
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:luckily for 8 club's supporters they've never been there when their team has beaten Central under lights.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:37 pm
Wedgie wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Got him, Yes!!!!!!
Who's got who?Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:luckily for 8 club's supporters they've never been there when their team has beaten Central under lights.
I'll list them.
Club's supporters that haven't been there when they've beaten Central under lights:
Central
Glenelg
Norwood
Port
Sturt
South
West
Eagles
8.
As I said, Im assuming one other club has beaten Central out there if Sam says its 7?? (And I apologise for being wrong if that's the case)
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:42 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Centrals dont play Centrals at night at Elizabeth in League games, so if its just a list of footy clubs that havent beaten Centrals at night at Elizabeth, there should be a few 1000 more on that list.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:45 pm
Wedgie wrote:Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Centrals dont play Centrals at night at Elizabeth in League games, so if its just a list of footy clubs that havent beaten Centrals at night at Elizabeth, there should be a few 1000 more on that list.
Why include 1000s of others, I don't see your point, surely only the 9 SANFL clubs supporters would be interested in any issues at Elizabeth?
My point is and I thought it was an obvious one is that sometimes supporters get more angry/agro when they lose and only 1 current SANFL club's fans had to endure that at Elizabeth from Centrals supporters on a Saturday night game and the fans of the other 8 current SANFL clubs didn't/dont. (Centrals fans never will have to, the other 7 clubs fans might have to at one stage or another in the future)
Its a pretty simple point, you seem to be agreeing with me that only one SANFL club has beaten Central at Elizabeth.
9 - 1 = 8
I don't know how to make it any simpler?
by Wedgie » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:48 pm
Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Fair enough, i just wouldn't include Centrals as a possability when it cant happen.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by BPBRB » Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:49 pm
Wedgie wrote:Sam_goUUUdogs wrote:Fair enough, i just wouldn't include Centrals as a possability when it cant happen.
You wouldn't include them as a possibility of it not happening as it can't happen to them?
That is weird weird weird logic!
Dude, where did you go to school?![]()
PS The way the Dogs are going at the moment it might not be a possibility for the other 7 clubs for a while yet either!
by Pseudo » Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:04 pm
by Brucetiki » Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:37 pm
Wedgie wrote:Perhaps instead of just calling him names people should actually promote the game like the original poster did instead of just turning it into an embarassment?
If noone had stooped to name calling then all the unsavoury events that have occurred wouldn't have been brought up.
The people calling PAP names are doing more to disservice the advertising of this game than anyone else.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |