by Grahaml » Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm
by Wedgie » Tue May 15, 2007 3:07 pm
Grahaml wrote: C'mon Wedgie. I'm sure there are some people around Elizabeth who could find a spot on the wall for a new hubcap.
Grahaml wrote: Perhaps it would be a good idea to petition the league through the clubs to get a better security presence at the grounds, preferably police security. What's bad for one club is bad for the league. And what's bad for the league then hurts the SANFL and our AFL teams. The strength of footy in SA is built on the strength of our competition. I hate the idea of supporters citing bad behaviour as a reason not to go, and it must hurt the brand of the SANFL to the point that corporate sponsorship goes down.
Perhaps another idea would be to put in some sort of restraning barricades in areas where people congregate and drink. Nothing so severe as segregating people, but just enough to spread the crowd about a bit. Coopers Hill had a lot of people in close proximity drinking, people pack it in close behind the goals and I'd be willing to suggest that most of the unsavoury incidents happen in the more open areas at the grounds. I think we're past needing the whole ground to fit people into these days, even at the biggest night games.
Anyway, I still think the best way to avoid trouble is to not incite opposition supporters, and to stand/sit further from the piss, and if you're really worried still I've spent a fair bit of time in the FFAs and not seen any problem there.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Grahaml » Tue May 15, 2007 3:08 pm
by doggies4eva » Tue May 15, 2007 3:30 pm
Grahaml wrote:Damn I hate seeing new posts appear between starting a reply and finishing it. Just want to point out in that version of events both parties are to blame. Each just escelated it that little bit and look where it ended up. I don't see how Centrals can be so singled out for blame when obviously it's been a situation inflamed by both parties.
by Wedgie » Tue May 15, 2007 3:34 pm
doggies4eva wrote:A further thought on this - anyone who goes along with flares or crackers has both premeditated their actions and taken a bit of time and trouble to procure these items. This is not simply a matter of losing ones temper in the heat of the moment. These people neeed to be weeded out and banned.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by mick » Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 pm
by Grahaml » Tue May 15, 2007 5:27 pm
by JK » Tue May 15, 2007 5:41 pm
mark ducker wrote:I have a solution. Legs fans if you lose and you are bitter about it. Dont ring up 5AA and blame fights evictions on the other set of fans to make yourself feel better. Even if that club is based in Elizabeth this is simply unacceptable behaviour.Im sure it was great the next morning having KG and Cornesy slapping you on the back praising your lies. Made you forget all about the previous nights ass whipping.
Do you see Centrals fan acting this way towards opposition. ???
Ill repeat one incident 7 people evicted in a crowd of 3850. Not even 0.2% of the crowd caused trouble. Security and SANFL are blameless.
Ill repeat security was less than half a metre away when it errupted . Less than 30 seconds later it was over and the 7 people evicted. What more could be done ???
by Grahaml » Tue May 15, 2007 5:55 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue May 15, 2007 5:57 pm
Grahaml wrote: On a sidenote, if someone got seriously hurt in the crossfire and sought legal advise on who to sue on Friday night, I GUARANTEE the 2 entities first on the hit list would be Norwood and the SANFL, and not the SDFC.
by Jar Man Out » Tue May 15, 2007 8:10 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:mark ducker wrote:I have a solution. Legs fans if you lose and you are bitter about it. Dont ring up 5AA and blame fights evictions on the other set of fans to make yourself feel better. Even if that club is based in Elizabeth this is simply unacceptable behaviour.Im sure it was great the next morning having KG and Cornesy slapping you on the back praising your lies. Made you forget all about the previous nights ass whipping.
Do you see Centrals fan acting this way towards opposition. ???
Ill repeat one incident 7 people evicted in a crowd of 3850. Not even 0.2% of the crowd caused trouble. Security and SANFL are blameless.
Ill repeat security was less than half a metre away when it errupted . Less than 30 seconds later it was over and the 7 people evicted. What more could be done ???
Mate, as much as you dislike Central fans being blamed for this you're happy enough to aportion blame in the other direction ... As I've tried to intimate in my posts, it shouldn't matter who an individual supports if he or she has done the wrong thing we need to stop them from being at the footy, I re-iterate it's not a Legs or Dogs thing, it is a SANFL fan behaviour issue!
And just to set the record straight, there were at least 2 different incidents that I witnessed first hand!
by cd » Tue May 15, 2007 8:54 pm
by topsywaldron » Tue May 15, 2007 9:27 pm
mark ducker wrote:Why dont ya ring up Cornesy and have a cry about it.
by stampy » Tue May 15, 2007 9:32 pm
Wedgie wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:SMAC - great post. Well written and very fair.
Facing reality - unlike some people who take a chance to just have another crack at the 'ferals' on these sort of threads.
Disregard Stampy's post mate, I think most of us are trying very hard to try and find an intelligent way of facing the issue/s.
by Wedgie » Tue May 15, 2007 9:37 pm
stampy wrote:Wedgie wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:SMAC - great post. Well written and very fair.
Facing reality - unlike some people who take a chance to just have another crack at the 'ferals' on these sort of threads.
Disregard Stampy's post mate, I think most of us are trying very hard to try and find an intelligent way of facing the issue/s.
er excuse me, and your publishing a photo of an alleged culprit at the north saturday night game last year was trying very hard and being intelligent? go back and read your own post of not attending elizabeth games in the future before you start telling people to disregard my posts, you are full of it pal honestly
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by BPBRB » Tue May 15, 2007 9:56 pm
by MUNGO JERRY » Tue May 15, 2007 10:09 pm
by Pseudo » Tue May 15, 2007 10:27 pm
BPBRB wrote: I was told to expect to see some tougher Security measures and much less tolerance at all games starting from this week.
by BPBRB » Tue May 15, 2007 10:28 pm
MUNGO JERRY wrote:My personal view on this whole sorry tale is the fact that in regards to the dogs fans pleading they have been hard done by and picked on, they need to remember the sordid past of their so called end to end party.
Yes its true they taunted and terrorized many a supporter through the 70's and 80's and I'm not referring to my personal experiences here but I did have a few.
I remember reading newspaper articles on that group in the 80's and none of it was good.
Sorry guys but 'shit sticks' and call me one eyed or prejudiced but if I hear or read of trouble at any sanfl game involving central, I immediately think of the...dare I say it?? feral throng from behind the goals that caused trouble and looked for it for no apparent reason in the past. Perhaps Mr Cornes is guilty of this too but he is a dick.
I look at the dogs fans these days and its a level playing field between all clubs and have been involved in confrontations at norwood oval at night in the past too.
Lets not forget that it usually takes '2 to tango' and I believe that in last week's game, this was the case. I still laugh at the fact norwood supporters can get violent!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |