Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should..........

by BPBRB » Thu May 17, 2007 9:18 pm
by am Bays » Thu May 17, 2007 9:36 pm
BPBRB wrote:Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!
Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should..........
by Ian » Fri May 18, 2007 12:19 am
nafc.com.au wrote:
Poll
Who will play football first?
O Ben Hart
O Mark Ricciuto
by Jar Man Out » Fri May 18, 2007 12:26 am
BPBRB wrote:Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!
Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should..........
by johntheclaret » Fri May 18, 2007 7:34 am
mark ducker wrote:I havent heard hart is retiring 100% confirmed yet . But Didnt he sign a two year contract.
I would be seriously upset if i was a rooster supporter.
thanks for chewing up the salary cap ben. the roosters may have been able to afford livingstone or morgan for their backline instead.
by Jimmy » Fri May 18, 2007 7:56 am
johntheclaret wrote:mark ducker wrote:I havent heard hart is retiring 100% confirmed yet . But Didnt he sign a two year contract.
I would be seriously upset if i was a rooster supporter.
thanks for chewing up the salary cap ben. the roosters may have been able to afford livingstone or morgan for their backline instead.
He was brought in for two reasons. One of those is to coach the defence, and judging by results he is doing a pretty good job. Sure, to have him playing would be a definite plus, but I for one will be happy if his influence in the defence continues until the end of the season.
by johntheclaret » Fri May 18, 2007 8:02 am
Jimmy wrote:johntheclaret wrote:mark ducker wrote:I havent heard hart is retiring 100% confirmed yet . But Didnt he sign a two year contract.
I would be seriously upset if i was a rooster supporter.
thanks for chewing up the salary cap ben. the roosters may have been able to afford livingstone or morgan for their backline instead.
He was brought in for two reasons. One of those is to coach the defence, and judging by results he is doing a pretty good job. Sure, to have him playing would be a definite plus, but I for one will be happy if his influence in the defence continues until the end of the season.
north signed him for 2 years, that pretty much tells me that wanted him playing. if they wanted him to coach full time, he would have been signed for 2 years as a coach.
i dont think there is much in this rumour but drebin is usually in the know so maybe he sees something on the horizon....
by BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 8:52 am
mark ducker wrote:BPBRB wrote:Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!
Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should..........
Will he see out the season in your opinion drebin ????
by Coorong » Fri May 18, 2007 8:57 am
by BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 9:01 am
Coorong wrote:Doesnt matter too much if he only plays another 3 or 4 h&away games. During the finals and for a critical game, give me a 75% fit Ben Hart over a 100% fit player with 20 games under his belt anytime
by rod_rooster » Fri May 18, 2007 9:55 am
BPBRB wrote:Coorong wrote:Doesnt matter too much if he only plays another 3 or 4 h&away games. During the finals and for a critical game, give me a 75% fit Ben Hart over a 100% fit player with 20 games under his belt anytime
That's all well and good to say that now but at the exclusion of a player who played all the game,, is 100 percent fit (or near enough but match hardened) and helped get the side to the finals???
Plus North got bitten on the ar*e big time in last year's finals for playing underdone injured players.
by Hondo » Fri May 18, 2007 10:04 am
BPBRB wrote:I think it has been a badly failed excercise up to now from the point of view of North targetting him to play a key position in defence, and as others have pointed out we probably missed some other younger fitter recruits to fill his playing role because of putting all the eggs in one basket so to speak.
by Grahaml » Fri May 18, 2007 11:05 am
by doggies4eva » Fri May 18, 2007 11:24 am
Grahaml wrote:Are we going to name every player to have played SANFL after playing AFL? Could be a long list.
by Hondo » Fri May 18, 2007 11:45 am
doggies4eva wrote:Grahaml wrote:Are we going to name every player to have played SANFL after playing AFL? Could be a long list.
And to put the original question posed by TRB: "I can't recall too many blokes that were of a fair service for their SANFL clubs after playing all but a year or two of their potential footy careers in the AFL"
A number of listed players could hardly have been described as playing most of their careers in the AFL!
by Grahaml » Fri May 18, 2007 12:47 pm
by Hondo » Fri May 18, 2007 1:08 pm
Grahaml wrote:Not sure what your point is there Hondo. Do you agree, disagree or are you just making an independant comment on players wanting to play as much AFL as they can?
by therisingblues » Fri May 18, 2007 3:08 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:I think Theri was more referring to players who only had a year or two left in them ... Most of the blokes on that list were de-listed with 5+ years of senior footy left in them.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |