Ben Hart

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Postby BPBRB » Thu May 17, 2007 9:18 pm

Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!

Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should.......... :roll:
BPBRB
 

Postby am Bays » Thu May 17, 2007 9:36 pm

BPBRB wrote:Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!

Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should.......... :roll:


Are you saying he wanted to but was talked out of it so North have cover if anymore defensive players get injured? Particularly with Ben's ability to play "tall".

Was he reminded that he is getting paid to coach and play not just coach so if you want all your money you need to be "playing" - well at least training to play??

With his heart (pardon the pun again) not 100% in it can we safely assume he won't be playing finals this year as players less than 100% committed aren't the type that do well in finals. Not saying ben hasn't got the ability as he clearly has but with his mind and head starting to "check out" of footy mode is he in Northe best 21 come finals time.

This is not a criticism against Ben or North but with you " :roll: " there appears to have been some erstwhile discussions yesterday afternoon behind closed doors at Menzies Cres.

I can see both sides of the argument here, Ben after 18 years of footy, his body is saying enough and his mind is sick of doing rehab for hammies after the past three years. Where as North have signed him to do a job(s) and don't want him to bail out after six weeks of the season.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19745
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 2124 times

Postby Dutchy » Thu May 17, 2007 10:55 pm

not playing the "devils advocate" there Tassie? :wink:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46245
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4310 times

Postby Ian » Fri May 18, 2007 12:19 am

From the official North site:

nafc.com.au wrote:
Poll
Who will play football first?


O Ben Hart
O Mark Ricciuto
North Adelaide F C : Champions of Aust 1972 : Premiers 1900, 02, 05, 20, 30, 31, 49, 52, 60, 71, 72, 87, 91
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Postby Jar Man Out » Fri May 18, 2007 12:26 am

BPBRB wrote:Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!

Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should.......... :roll:


Will he see out the season in your opinion drebin ????
User avatar
Jar Man Out
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby johntheclaret » Fri May 18, 2007 7:34 am

mark ducker wrote:I havent heard hart is retiring 100% confirmed yet . But Didnt he sign a two year contract.

I would be seriously upset if i was a rooster supporter.

thanks for chewing up the salary cap ben. the roosters may have been able to afford livingstone or morgan for their backline instead.


He was brought in for two reasons. One of those is to coach the defence, and judging by results he is doing a pretty good job. Sure, to have him playing would be a definite plus, but I for one will be happy if his influence in the defence continues until the end of the season.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Postby Jimmy » Fri May 18, 2007 7:56 am

johntheclaret wrote:
mark ducker wrote:I havent heard hart is retiring 100% confirmed yet . But Didnt he sign a two year contract.

I would be seriously upset if i was a rooster supporter.

thanks for chewing up the salary cap ben. the roosters may have been able to afford livingstone or morgan for their backline instead.


He was brought in for two reasons. One of those is to coach the defence, and judging by results he is doing a pretty good job. Sure, to have him playing would be a definite plus, but I for one will be happy if his influence in the defence continues until the end of the season.


north signed him for 2 years, that pretty much tells me that wanted him playing. if they wanted him to coach full time, he would have been signed for 2 years as a coach.

i dont think there is much in this rumour but drebin is usually in the know so maybe he sees something on the horizon....
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby johntheclaret » Fri May 18, 2007 8:02 am

Jimmy wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
mark ducker wrote:I havent heard hart is retiring 100% confirmed yet . But Didnt he sign a two year contract.

I would be seriously upset if i was a rooster supporter.

thanks for chewing up the salary cap ben. the roosters may have been able to afford livingstone or morgan for their backline instead.


He was brought in for two reasons. One of those is to coach the defence, and judging by results he is doing a pretty good job. Sure, to have him playing would be a definite plus, but I for one will be happy if his influence in the defence continues until the end of the season.


north signed him for 2 years, that pretty much tells me that wanted him playing. if they wanted him to coach full time, he would have been signed for 2 years as a coach.

i dont think there is much in this rumour but drebin is usually in the know so maybe he sees something on the horizon....



Agree Jimmy. I think I was trying to say, that he appears to be doing such a good job coaching the defence, if results are anything to go by, I would not be unhappy if that's all he ended up diong for the rest of the season. Like I sais, would be great to have him playing as well. I suppose the question is, can he give both roles the time each one needs to produce the results.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Postby BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 8:52 am

mark ducker wrote:
BPBRB wrote:Newsflash - Ben Hart is the clear gold medal favourite now for the new Olympic Sport the "back flip". But only if his hammies hold up!

Seriously if people think there was nothing in this then they should.......... :roll:


Will he see out the season in your opinion drebin ????


To be honest - who would know and some people at North are playing "ducks and drakes" as well? If he continues his current games played ratio he might scrape together 3 games in total for the minor round given he has played 1 game in 7 weeks all be it including up to this week 2 byes as well but he wouldn't have been available in any case if we had games scheduled in Rd 3 and this weekend.

I think it has been a badly failed excercise up to now from the point of view of North targetting him to play a key position in defence, and as others have pointed out we probably missed some other younger fitter recruits to fill his playing role because of putting all the eggs in one basket so to speak.

He has done some good work as the defensive coach so that is the only plus I can see at this stage. Still, it is hard not to be cynical about this whole thing.
BPBRB
 

Postby Coorong » Fri May 18, 2007 8:57 am

Doesnt matter too much if he only plays another 3 or 4 h&away games. During the finals and for a critical game, give me a 75% fit Ben Hart over a 100% fit player with 20 games under his belt anytime
User avatar
Coorong
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1524
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:48 am
Location: In the Coaches Box
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Postby BPBRB » Fri May 18, 2007 9:01 am

Coorong wrote:Doesnt matter too much if he only plays another 3 or 4 h&away games. During the finals and for a critical game, give me a 75% fit Ben Hart over a 100% fit player with 20 games under his belt anytime


That's all well and good to say that now but at the exclusion of a player who played all the game,, is 100 percent fit (or near enough but match hardened) and helped get the side to the finals???

Plus North got bitten on the ar*e big time in last year's finals for playing underdone injured players.
BPBRB
 

Postby rod_rooster » Fri May 18, 2007 9:55 am

BPBRB wrote:
Coorong wrote:Doesnt matter too much if he only plays another 3 or 4 h&away games. During the finals and for a critical game, give me a 75% fit Ben Hart over a 100% fit player with 20 games under his belt anytime


That's all well and good to say that now but at the exclusion of a player who played all the game,, is 100 percent fit (or near enough but match hardened) and helped get the side to the finals???

Plus North got bitten on the ar*e big time in last year's finals for playing underdone injured players.


and the year before and the year before that......
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby Hondo » Fri May 18, 2007 10:04 am

BPBRB wrote:I think it has been a badly failed excercise up to now from the point of view of North targetting him to play a key position in defence, and as others have pointed out we probably missed some other younger fitter recruits to fill his playing role because of putting all the eggs in one basket so to speak.


Is that fact or just speculation ....? Are there any names (of alternative recruits we missed) to slot in there? Do you think North are surprised he is having injury problems (and have no plan B) given that was the reason the Crows cut him?

You don't think Jars thought this might happen hence giving a 'player' unprecedented 'coaching' responsibility?

I think this may be a storm in a tea-cup
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby Grahaml » Fri May 18, 2007 11:05 am

Are we going to name every player to have played SANFL after playing AFL? Could be a long list.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Postby doggies4eva » Fri May 18, 2007 11:24 am

Grahaml wrote:Are we going to name every player to have played SANFL after playing AFL? Could be a long list.


And to put the original question posed by TRB: "I can't recall too many blokes that were of a fair service for their SANFL clubs after playing all but a year or two of their potential footy careers in the AFL"

A number of listed players could hardly have been described as playing most of their careers in the AFL!
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Hondo » Fri May 18, 2007 11:45 am

doggies4eva wrote:
Grahaml wrote:Are we going to name every player to have played SANFL after playing AFL? Could be a long list.


And to put the original question posed by TRB: "I can't recall too many blokes that were of a fair service for their SANFL clubs after playing all but a year or two of their potential footy careers in the AFL"

A number of listed players could hardly have been described as playing most of their careers in the AFL!


More than half of those listed played most of their careers in the AFL. Most guys who make the AFL understandably try to play as long as they can at the highest level which is fair enough.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby Grahaml » Fri May 18, 2007 12:47 pm

Not sure what your point is there Hondo. Do you agree, disagree or are you just making an independant comment on players wanting to play as much AFL as they can?
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Postby LBT » Fri May 18, 2007 1:03 pm

Simon Cox thread maybe?
User avatar
LBT
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:39 pm
Has liked: 127 times
Been liked: 23 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Postby Hondo » Fri May 18, 2007 1:08 pm

Grahaml wrote:Not sure what your point is there Hondo. Do you agree, disagree or are you just making an independant comment on players wanting to play as much AFL as they can?


The comment is that not many guys who have 'made it' at the next level come back to successfully play SANFL at the end of their careers. Which I agree with.

I am just offering an explanation that if you are playing well at AFL level, you would do it for as long as you can and then most likely retire from all levels of football once your AFL career finishes.

To be able to come back over the age of 30 and be successful at SANFL you would need to have been very lucky with injuries and be super-motivated to come back and play at the lower level.

So it would be hard to come up with a long list unless you include guys who had their AFL careers terminated before they wanted them to.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Postby therisingblues » Fri May 18, 2007 3:08 pm

Constance_Perm wrote:I think Theri was more referring to players who only had a year or two left in them ... Most of the blokes on that list were de-listed with 5+ years of senior footy left in them.


Thanks for that CP. Yeh, the point I was originally making was in realtion to Jimmy's post where he said he had wished that Scotty Russell and Sanderson would have come back and put the socks on after completing their AFL careers. However when those guys were in the twilight of their careers they were still playing AFL, IMO, and while a few may make a case of the SANFL not being as physically demanding as the AFL, too many players in their last days have tried to squeeze in a year or two, without putting in the effort, and been found out.
Any player that has played AFL and then played SANFL and made a fair contribution is an interesting topic, but it wasn't what I meant. Perhaps either one of these points could be put into seperate threads.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |