SA Footy

Booney wrote:"So, who is your source?"

"K.G"

Has this been checked?
YES!
How many sources?
ONE!
Name it.
K.G.!

Booney wrote:

stan wrote:This is histerical really. The source is KG. It will probably be confirmed by Jars........

Well, he was right about Clarkson coaching the Crows.

And then further confirm by Rowey. We could have all the SA media stars on this one.

Pseudo wrote:

Booney wrote:"So, who is your source?"

"K.G"

Has this been checked?
YES!
How many sources?
ONE!
Name it.
K.G.!

"KG? He's a malaka, isn't he John? For the viewers at home John, what does malaka mean???"

am Bays wrote:

Pseudo wrote:

Booney wrote:"So, who is your source?"

"K.G"

Has this been checked?
YES!
How many sources?
ONE!
Name it.
K.G.!

"KG? He's a malaka, isn't he John? For the viewers at home John, what does malaka mean???"

Isn't that the name of the waterway between Malaysia and Indonesia.

"Who'd KG say is leaving the SANFL? Port and the Crows?

The Crows? Really? Faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk!"

Adelaide contributed $2.69 million to the SANFL so it could field a standalone team in the state-wide competition.

Still want them out of the competition?

Yes.
Please make it happen.

outside of my pay scale mate

MW wrote:Adelaide contributed $2.69 million to the SANFL so it could field a standalone team in the state-wide competition.

Still want them out of the competition?

Yes, them & the pams can f#ck right off.

MW wrote:Adelaide contributed $2.69 million to the SANFL so it could field a standalone team in the state-wide competition.

Still want them out of the competition?

Isn't it more like $400,000?

not according to the Crows AGM

MW wrote:not according to the Crows AGM

yeah I saw that figure and wonder how they arrive at it.

Strictly speaking it was an information session. Crows members are not allowed to attend their AGM. That is held with an AFL representative.

Ronnie wrote:Crows members are not allowed to attend their AGM.

The team for no South Australians!

MW wrote:not according to the Crows AGM

Correction

Not according to what's documented in The Advertiser.

The $2.69 Mill is not just for playing in the the SANFL, $400 K for playing in the SANFL the balance would be as part of the return to the SMA for playing games at AO which then goes to the SANFL.

Not that the Advertiser would put it's own spin on anything to do with the AFL clubs here in SA.

Magellan wrote:

Ronnie wrote:Crows members are not allowed to attend their AGM.

The team for no South Australians!

Seems to work ok, if you accept your football club is actually not really a football club

I think you'll find certain members are invited, but don't let that get in the way of a shitbagging session.

MW wrote:I think you'll find certain members are invited, but don't let that get in the way of a shitbagging session.

LOL i bet that 'certain members' are handpicked to cause as little disruption as possible lol

hows getting invited to your AGM working for you lads?

MW wrote:I think you'll find certain members are invited

Why not all?

How much rent have they paid for use of footy Park over the last 25 years?