Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:55 pmBounce of the ball wrote:I know the Crows said they would get an extra 4000 but taking that spin and bs away it's a good crowd by North. If they were playing a real team with a reasonable supporter base ( say Glenelg) that is like a 6000 crowd.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:07 amBounce of the ball wrote:...taking that spin and bs away it's a good crowd by North.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:37 amStrayDog wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:...taking that spin and bs away it's a good crowd by North.
Fair call.
Just looking at some of the stats, North would have to be pretty pleased with 133 points from 333 possessions. Way better conversion rate than anyone else over the round.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:46 amPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:00 amDogwatcher wrote:What will the crowd be next time?
That's the important question. There'll be no novelty factor and by the time North meet them again, most supporters will have moved on from wanting to ridicule them.
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:08 amPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:09 amWedgie wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:What will the crowd be next time?
That's the important question. There'll be no novelty factor and by the time North meet them again, most supporters will have moved on from wanting to ridicule them.
I'm glad you said most
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:03 amPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:04 amjohntheclaret wrote:StrayDog wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:...taking that spin and bs away it's a good crowd by North.
Fair call.
Just looking at some of the stats, North would have to be pretty pleased with 133 points from 333 possessions. Way better conversion rate than anyone else over the round.
I kept commenting on the Disposal Stats over on the Roost. It sounded like North were very efficient with the ball.