Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:29 am3 games to 2 is my guess.
Booney wrote:3 games to 2 is my guess.
Agreed. Reckon that will be about spot on the money, mate...
Page 5 of 7
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:29 amRe: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:27 amAgreed. Reckon that will be about spot on the money, mate...
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:53 amMy gut feeling is the tribunal will be very hard on it, definitely wasn't an accident and even though it seems he was just showing the ump what had happened, it wasn't done in a friendly manner. I'm thinking 7-8.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:56 amI'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 5:51 pmWedgie wrote:I'd just give a warning, I wouldn't even call it a push!
The ump didn't react to it either, or at least didn't appear to.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:26 pmDeserves a couple of weeks. Not a good look, plus I don't particularly like Moore so I'm biased.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 6:36 pm2 down to 1 would be fine (just because we have them this weekend)
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:25 pm3 weeks by the looks of it.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:06 pmsaintal wrote:3 weeks by the looks of it.
Correct.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:11 pmSeems an odd number. Give him either 1 due to minor contact or 8 for breaking the golden rule.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:18 pmGot 3 games - appeal likely 
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:27 pmLPH wrote:Got 3 games - appeal likely
Diesel Williams would like to appeal the leniency too.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:35 pmRe: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:32 pmCh9 covered the tribunal live in their news bulletin, of course talking about his potential no availability for the Power this weekend
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:11 am"We get what we deserve"
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:42 amAt the end of the day you can't touch and umpire. We all know this. They are untouchable and there is a reason why. So really probably got what was expected.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:27 am3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:47 amon the rails wrote:3 weeks seems harsh given the cicumstances in this case?
Agreed - but I'm not sure where you draw the line when it comes to that sort of contact with an umpire. If a more leniant approach is taken this time - how do you judge the next case where contact is ever so slightly more robust, and so on...
It certainly sends a clear message.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:50 amProbably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.
Re: Rnd 3- Port v North Saturday, 12.10
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:31 pmDogwatcher wrote:Probably didn't deserve three games, but the tribunal would have felt a message needed to be sent, hence the penalty.
Spot on.