My apologies.1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Spelly 1, Tassie 0 (was there ever any doubt)
It is law 20.3 in the VCFL Handbook, as law 20.1 states: "this law applies to all competitions other than AFL"
by spell_check » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:54 pm
My apologies.1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Spelly 1, Tassie 0 (was there ever any doubt)
It is law 20.3 in the VCFL Handbook, as law 20.1 states: "this law applies to all competitions other than AFL"
by sydney-dog » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:54 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:55 pm
Dog_ger wrote:I think he got dragged... Dropped a couple of sitters right in front of goal....
Didn't see any crowd mis-haps wedge....?
Seemed all well behaved....
A red Flare late into the last 1/4, but only chants and dancing from what I saw.....
All in fun....
Anyone else comment....?
Lighting seemed better this year...?
Anyone else...?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by cennals05 » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:57 pm
Wedgie wrote:Did Schell play the whole game down back, was he on Alleway?
How was the battle?
How did Westhoff go at full forward on Schubert Im assuming?
by cennals05 » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:02 pm
sydney-dog wrote:how many did Lawry end up with ?
by Dog_ger » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:02 pm
by am Bays » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:03 pm
sydney-dog wrote:how many did Lawry end up with ?
by Macca19 » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:04 pm
by sydney-dog » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:05 pm
by spell_check » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:06 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:sydney-dog wrote:how many did Lawry end up with ?
5234 runs @ 47.15 in 67 tests
by Dog_ger » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:08 pm
by Dog_ger » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:10 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:14 pm
Dog_ger wrote:I honestly expected more from North this year Macca.....
Dog_ger wrote:I have always said "We have a bloody good coach"
Dog_ger wrote:A good crowd at Elizabeth....
Apachebulldog estimated 5000
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by carey » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:14 pm
by Kahuna » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:15 pm
by sydney-dog » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:17 pm
by sydney-dog » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:20 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:21 pm
sydney-dog wrote:I mentioned on a couple of occassions during last year that I felt North's list had too many runners that were good attacking players when in space, but were not as strong defensively or in close
After the finals, my thoughts were, for North to be successful in 2007 they had to recruit players that were
1. strong bodied
2. very good in close
3. very strong defensively
I would be interested in North supporters views on this
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |