by Dog_ger » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:00 am
by Jimmy » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:09 am
Dog_ger wrote:Jimmy.
What a fabulous ending.
How long ago was it that the crowd noise was so great you could not hear the final siren...!
Great to be there.
A memory.
by zipzap » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:13 am
magpie in the 80's wrote:zipzap wrote:Central (wash my mouth out!)
slaughter/last man standing comp
oh yee of little faith ZZ![]()
by zipzap » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:19 am
dogs01 wrote:This certainly was the turning point. Cochrane had the mark and Chambers gave away a 25 then Grima came in and touched Chambers and he fell over like he had been shot (like every player does), which is fine , but my beef is it should have still been a centrals free kick. Normally the umpire will stop the 25 metre penalty and still have that team take the free kick. The only time the decision is reversed is when it is just a straight free kick not a 25 aswell.
by zipzap » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:21 am
Grahaml wrote:Dogs were pretty ordinary IMO, but Sturt were very good.
by Dog_ger » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:27 am
by zipzap » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:29 am
Dog_ger wrote:Whats the matter Zip...?
by Dog_ger » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:37 am
by dogs01 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:39 am
zipzap wrote:dogs01 wrote:This certainly was the turning point. Cochrane had the mark and Chambers gave away a 25 then Grima came in and touched Chambers and he fell over like he had been shot (like every player does), which is fine , but my beef is it should have still been a centrals free kick. Normally the umpire will stop the 25 metre penalty and still have that team take the free kick. The only time the decision is reversed is when it is just a straight free kick not a 25 aswell.
You're right of course but you're conveniently forgetting that exactly the same thing happened in the first half. We had a 25m dead in front of goals penalty overturned by Centrals play-acting. I thought Centrals were gifted some very very soft free kicks in the first half and I say that because we won, not as an excuse after the fact. Paper says frees were 20 / 20 in the finish however.
by godoubleblues » Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:07 am
zipzap wrote:dogs01 wrote:This certainly was the turning point. Cochrane had the mark and Chambers gave away a 25 then Grima came in and touched Chambers and he fell over like he had been shot (like every player does), which is fine , but my beef is it should have still been a centrals free kick. Normally the umpire will stop the 25 metre penalty and still have that team take the free kick. The only time the decision is reversed is when it is just a straight free kick not a 25 aswell.
You're right of course but you're conveniently forgetting that exactly the same thing happened in the first half. We had a 25m dead in front of goals penalty overturned by Centrals play-acting. I thought Centrals were gifted some very very soft free kicks in the first half and I say that because we won, not as an excuse after the fact. Paper says frees were 20 / 20 in the finish however.
by dogfish » Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:42 am
by SnappyTom » Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:55 am
zipzap wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:zipzap wrote:Central (wash my mouth out!)
slaughter/last man standing comp
oh yee of little faith ZZ![]()
Heh heh, I'm soooo glad to be wrong on that one. Mock me if you will but I will be enjoying the $20 I put on the boys at the last minute at $4.60 thank you very much!!!!
WOW! I'm still lost for words after yesterday. 3700 my arse, that place was packed. Good to see lots of Dogs fans travelling but boy were they quiet when things got tough. Like the players themselves they are not used to pressure and don't handle well it when it comes.
...
An amazing game. We would have to be favourites against Port now which is a dangerous mindset to have. However Norwood remain the best team I have seen all year.
by bulldogproud » Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:32 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:52 pm
by zipzap » Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:13 pm
by purch » Sun Jun 10, 2007 2:21 pm
by johntheclaret » Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:43 pm
by cennals05 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:55 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:03 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:06 pm
johntheclaret wrote:All good news for the competition. One swallow doesn't make a summer, but it sure is good that Sturt won yesterday. Well done boys.
Sounds like another classic of a game too. Even if it wasn't on telly, if it gets people talking about it at work, or in the pub, then it must be good for future crowds. This year is so unpredictable it's not real. Next week Westies will pull in a two pointer and Port win at Sturt, just to keep it nice and interesting. Think south might be punished for yesterdays defeat and North will have to overcome one of their bogey sides.
Possible table after next week (Assuming North win at the Bays tomorrow)
CDFC..... 18 if they win at South
Sturt..... 12 if they lose to PAM
North..... 11 if they beat Bays and lose to WWT![]()
Eagles....10 if they beat north
Port.......10 if they beat Sturt
Norwood.10 Bye
West......6 if they beat Glenelg
South.....5
Glenelg...2 Wooden Spoon
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |