Live Scores - 17/06/07

[SnappyTom]

Who played good for Glenelg?

West Adelaide

[johntheclaret]

NA 17 8 110
WWT 12 10 82

Thank you North
Thank you Alisha
Thank you RPH
Thank you God

[Mr66]

Who played good for Glenelg?

West Adelaide

LOL

BTW, anyone have final scores from all games?

[magpie in the 80's]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 26.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

[Mr66]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 18.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

Ta!

[SnappyTom]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 18.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

BAYS 26.18.174

[Mr66]

That score may be either 26.18.174 or 26.16.172.
That is our first 100+ margin this year.

[johntheclaret]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 18.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

Central / South, only 1 scoring shot in to. Bad kicking is bad footy, so they say. Could have been much closer

[am Bays]

I'll stand corrected but that is our biggest win in 10 years since we destroyed South at the Bay in 1996 (IIRC) - Incidently it was Sheldon's last game will history repeat itself......

[SnappyTom]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 18.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

Central / South, only 1 scoring shot in to. Bad kicking is bad footy, so they say. Could have been much closer

We kicked 4.8 in the first half, South kicked 4.8 in the second.
Both sides had chances to be more accurate...

[Dutchy]

I'll stand corrected but that is our biggest win in 10 years since we destroyed South at the Bay in 1996 (IIRC) - Incidently it was Sheldon's last game will history repeat itself......

It was our biggest win since 1995 (143pts vs Sturt) and our biggest EVER win vs West! Previous best vs West was 131 points in 1974

More details to follow later...

[johntheclaret]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 18.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

Central / South, only 1 scoring shot in to. Bad kicking is bad footy, so they say. Could have been much closer

We kicked 4.8 in the first half, South kicked 4.8 in the second.
Both sides had chances to be more accurate...

The final scores don't lie SnappyTom. That just means CD got their kicking boots on in the 2nd half and kicked 10 3. Maybe if South had been a bit more accurate in the 1st half and had a bigger lead it might have been a different result

[RoosterMarty]

Great win by North today, we got a few goals up a couple of times but Eagles hit back and I was a bit worried they would run over us but we stood tall and won comfortably in the end. Gutsy stuff Roosters!

[magpie in the 80's]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 26.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

OOOPS SORRY mr.66 SHOULD LOOK BEFORE I SEND

[SnappyTom]

CENTRALS: 14.11.95
SOUTH: 10.14.74

NORTH: 17.8.110
EAGLES: 12.10.82

GLENELG: 18.18.172
WESTIES: 6.6.42

Central / South, only 1 scoring shot in to. Bad kicking is bad footy, so they say. Could have been much closer

We kicked 4.8 in the first half, South kicked 4.8 in the second.
Both sides had chances to be more accurate...

The final scores don't lie SnappyTom. That just means CD got their kicking boots on in the 2nd half and kicked 10 3. Maybe if South had been a bit more accurate in the 1st half and had a bigger lead it might have been a different result

100% correct.

[johntheclaret]

what's the opinion regarding Centrals. South this week, North a few weeks back, a few sides have stayed with them for 1/2 or 3/4 of the game, then the dogs just get up and win.

With North, mental attitude is usually blamed for their demise. what about the rest. Is it fitness, training or what?

[Coorong]

I'll stand corrected but that is our biggest win in 10 years since we destroyed South at the Bay in 1996 (IIRC) - Incidently it was Sheldon's last game will history repeat itself......

Now I am game for a slab on that "possibility"

[dogs01]

what's the opinion regarding Centrals. South this week, North a few weeks back, a few sides have stayed with them for 1/2 or 3/4 of the game, then the dogs just get up and win.

With North, mental attitude is usually blamed for their demise. what about the rest. Is it fitness, training or what?

From watching the dogs every week it almost seems that they pace themselves for the first half and then put the foot down in the second half.They stay with the oppositions enough to be close enough at half time, then bang they just seem to have another gear.IMO

[SnappyTom]

what's the opinion regarding Centrals. South this week, North a few weeks back, a few sides have stayed with them for 1/2 or 3/4 of the game, then the dogs just get up and win.

With North, mental attitude is usually blamed for their demise. what about the rest. Is it fitness, training or what?

We've slept a bit over the last four or five games in the first half, too. Maybe we need something (someone?) to kick our backsides into life. Especially the North, Sturt and South games.
Only hope we don't coast like five years ago. But Westoff and Symes in finals will make a huge difference...

[am Bays]

Bays above 50% for for and agaisnt if we win next week, along with North and Central we will be in the five??

Work that out??? Don't think we deserve to be there ATM...But I'll take it want to see the same effort we've seen for the last few weeks repeated a few more times before I start getting too excited