Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:34 pm
Booney wrote:Groucho wrote:Why can't they play with the U18s?
Might have something to do with them not being under 18.
Time slot I think he means
Booney wrote:Groucho wrote:Why can't they play with the U18s?
Might have something to do with them not being under 18.
Groucho wrote:Rising Power wrote:Groucho wrote:More Beer wrote:How much better would this photo (and the league) look by removing the one on each end:
http://sanfl.com.au/news/2018/12/13/201 ... re-launch/
Someone has to say it.
How much better would this photo (and the league) look by removing the one on each end and also removing the front row.
Hate how SANFL has moved league games forward an hour to fit SANFLW games in after. Screwed up my whole Saturday routine. I will NOT be staying to watch SANFLW. Will player presentations be moved back after home games to include the women's game. I hope not.
Yep send them back to the kitchen where they belong
Thanks for your sarcasm but that wasn't my meaning. I am not against females playing football per se but I have zero interest in it. They don't belong with the League and Reserves teams. Why can't they play with the U18s?
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Groucho wrote:Why can't they play with the U18s?
Might have something to do with them not being under 18.
Time slot I think he means
Booney wrote:This is the whinge thread.
DOC wrote:Mitch Grigg confirms that he will not join an AFL side in any mid season draft.In essence he said that they have had a chance to pick you up, they didn't so why do that to yourself and your club.
Groucho wrote:OK. I love football but I find 3 games in a day too many. I would prefer if the SANFLW game was played at 9 am before the Reserves.
If that is the case (combined player presentations). I will be leaving at the conclusion of the League (male) game and going home and miss the player presentations, something I enjoy doing. Club miss out on me buying meal and drinks.
northerner wrote:Groucho wrote:OK. I love football but I find 3 games in a day too many. I would prefer if the SANFLW game was played at 9 am before the Reserves.
If that is the case (combined player presentations). I will be leaving at the conclusion of the League (male) game and going home and miss the player presentations, something I enjoy doing. Club miss out on me buying meal and drinks.
Centrals Presentations will be held after the league (Mens) game. They will be brought forward from the 6pm time slot of last year.
DOC wrote:Mitch Grigg confirms that he will not join an AFL side in any mid season draft.In essence he said that they have had a chance to pick you up, they didn't so why do that to yourself and your club.
Port were asked for some information about AO in a parliamentary enquiry about the operation of the place. If you have re aad a few if the articles it states that Port asked the SMA for more detailed and were denied this, hence they cannot provide a reasonable response without the correct details.Brett wrote:Speaking of Intregity . Port whingeing , yes again , about the AO hotel . FFS was it not them that initiated the move there ?Oh yes it was ! I say pack your bags and play at Alberton and sort it yourself. Leaches .
harric wrote:Port were asked for some information about AO in a parliamentary enquiry about the operation of the place. If you have re aad a few if the articles it states that Port asked the SMA for more detailed and were denied this, hence they cannot provide a reasonable response without the correct details.Brett wrote:Speaking of Intregity . Port whingeing , yes again , about the AO hotel . FFS was it not them that initiated the move there ?Oh yes it was ! I say pack your bags and play at Alberton and sort it yourself. Leaches .
The Crowd were asked for the same input.
Also Port and the Crows are pushing for a seat on the SMA table, this has been constant for some time bit was stated again in recent articles.
No this is not correct. 1 seat each will not give them control of the SMA, only visability of the finances.UK Fan wrote:harric wrote:Port were asked for some information about AO in a parliamentary enquiry about the operation of the place. If you have re aad a few if the articles it states that Port asked the SMA for more detailed and were denied this, hence they cannot provide a reasonable response without the correct details.Brett wrote:Speaking of Intregity . Port whingeing , yes again , about the AO hotel . FFS was it not them that initiated the move there ?Oh yes it was ! I say pack your bags and play at Alberton and sort it yourself. Leaches .
The Crowd were asked for the same input.
Also Port and the Crows are pushing for a seat on the SMA table, this has been constant for some time bit was stated again in recent articles.
Now pafc and crows want to control Adelaide oval revenue and take control of sma.
Anyone else surprised even after a $9 million uplift in revenue for the afl clubs by moving to Adelaide Oval. That they contributed nothing towards.
The afl clubs still want more.
Pafc nearly bankrupted sa football and now wants to control its finances.
Unbelievable.
harric wrote:No this is not correct. 1 seat each will not give them control of the SMA, only visability of the finances.UK Fan wrote:harric wrote:Port were asked for some information about AO in a parliamentary enquiry about the operation of the place. If you have re aad a few if the articles it states that Port asked the SMA for more detailed and were denied this, hence they cannot provide a reasonable response without the correct details.Brett wrote:Speaking of Intregity . Port whingeing , yes again , about the AO hotel . FFS was it not them that initiated the move there ?Oh yes it was ! I say pack your bags and play at Alberton and sort it yourself. Leaches .
The Crowd were asked for the same input.
Also Port and the Crows are pushing for a seat on the SMA table, this has been constant for some time bit was stated again in recent articles.
Now pafc and crows want to control Adelaide oval revenue and take control of sma.
Anyone else surprised even after a $9 million uplift in revenue for the afl clubs by moving to Adelaide Oval. That they contributed nothing towards.
The afl clubs still want more.
Pafc nearly bankrupted sa football and now wants to control its finances.
Unbelievable.
I can understand why the SANFL are so concerned with protecting there SMA share after the WAFL stadium decision.
UK Fan wrote:
They want more control of the revenue simple. Otherwise they’d be happy with the status quo.
Has saca got visibility of smas finances ?
If not why do port and crows need it ?