Page 1 of 8
Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:33 pmby sturtpeter
I am tired to death of seing the SANFL's best FF totally unfairly played against.
Will this ensure a new interpretation or will the current panel be more assertive?
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:38 pmby once_were_warriors
Ahh blow it out your asz
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:38 pmby bayman
you have just proved you are an idiot, he gets frees sometimes & other times he gives them away, his problem is when he gives them away HE mouths off & gives away 25 metre penalties & is the worst offender at doing this in the league
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:44 pmby Wedgie
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:44 pmby bulldogproud
Pete, the best full forward in the State is actually not playing much at full forward any more due to the constant attention which he received - Daniel Schell. He proved today just how good a forward he is by kicking four goals in fifteen minutes when moved to the forward line in the third quarter. Full forwards unfortunately just have to deal with the attention they receive.
Cheers
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:47 pmby sturtpeter
Wedgie and Chrissy!
He gets crucified week in week out.
A now retired SANFL player allegedly provoked him at Oval Avenue two years ago.
I think Brant's the best thing since sliced bread.
Go U Premiers!
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:48 pmby sturtpeter
P.S.
Daniel's a mate of mine.
Why don't the Doggies reward him with an offensive role?
Go Sturt!
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:49 pmby bulldogproud
Pete, all forwards seem to be crucified each week. I don't think that Brant is an orphan in that regard. That is all I am saying.
Cheers
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:51 pmby Jardog
You must be joking Sturtpeter,half of his goals were from free kicks last season.
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:52 pmby gadj1976
SP
You're an embarrassment to the club, go away!
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:53 pmby SnappyTom
sturtpeter wrote:P.S.
Daniel's a mate of mine.
Why don't the Doggies reward him with an offensive role?
Go Sturt!
Schell asked to move down back, for career longevity.
If he had stayed in the forward line at the start of 2007 he'ds be a spent force by now.
It's well known we structure our game around a solid back 6. He is missed when he moves up forward, but his effort in the third quarter today was worth the price of admission. I like McConnell too, he's a great goal sneek, and gets under the guard well... ST...
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:55 pmby sturtpeter
Tom!
I agree.
Hope you are well.
as far as the inappropriate poster, Get a life.
Thanks!
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:56 pmby mighty_tiger_79
sturtpeter wrote:Tom!
I agree.
Hope you are well.
as far as the inappropriate poster, Get a life.Thanks!
talking to yourself now SP
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:57 pmby bulldogproud
Pete, as Snappy said Schelly does not want to play up forward. It was his call and he was fed up with being constantly 'attended to' just in the way you say Brant is.
Cheers
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 8:57 pmby SnappyTom
sturtpeter wrote:Tom!
I agree.
Hope you are well.
as far as the inappropriate poster, Get a life.
Thanks!
I'll catch up with you at the Round 23 clash at The Ponderosa, SP.
Big Bad Brant will be kept goal-less on that night, no doubt
scragged and
manhandled* by Schell...
2008 finds me well...
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 9:00 pmby Punk Rooster
sturtpeter wrote:Go U Premiers!
you barrack for Geelong & Centrals?
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 9:08 pmby GWW
Punk Rooster wrote:sturtpeter wrote:Go U Premiers!
you barrack for Geelong & Centrals?
No he's just a fan of Mike Rann.
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 9:24 pmby southee
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 9:29 pmby Dirko
WTF ? In the games I've seen Chambo (v Glenelg) he's usually kicked a few, Sammy has had him under control though, and yep...he's given a few frees away, yapped at the Umpire & thanks mate that'll be 25...
Just to think if his old man used protection...there would be no Chambo
Re: Will someone take action to ensure Chambers receives protect
Posted:
Sun May 04, 2008 9:41 pmby woodwt
Oh please
