Trial Game Results 25/3/06
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:46 pmWest defeated Sturt, any other results/scores???
Page 1 of 6
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:46 pmPosted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:48 pmSouth 20.12 (132) d Port 19.10 (124)
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:51 pmPS I got that score from thepowerfromport.com
I had to giggle at a couple of comments by the Port fans on there:
"is this round 1... i didnt even know it was on "
"i didnt know wakelin played for port... guess u learn somthing new every day "
Christ, and I thought Crows supporters were ignorant!
Deadset, the only difference these days between Power and Crows supporters is that the Crows supporters are employed, they're both as stupid as each other when it comes to football.
I had to giggle at a couple of comments by the Port fans on there:
"is this round 1... i didnt even know it was on "
"i didnt know wakelin played for port... guess u learn somthing new every day "
Christ, and I thought Crows supporters were ignorant!
Deadset, the only difference these days between Power and Crows supporters is that the Crows supporters are employed, they're both as stupid as each other when it comes to football.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:10 pmNot surprised at the Westies win/margin. but I bet there are some serious discussions about to happen at Port.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:13 pmBy the way Wedgie Crows supporters are not ignorant, but we are proudly arogant. And not all are chardonnay set. I myself prefer a little malt or a bold shiraz
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:28 pmCoorong wrote:By the way Wedgie Crows supporters are not ignorant, but we are proudly arogant. And not all are chardonnay set. I myself prefer a little malt or a bold shiraz
Wine has nothing to do with it, I hate red but enjoy a nice chardonnay.
I'm not insinuating that ALL Port or Crows supporters are completely ignornant, just a larger majority than most, most of my Crows and Power friends agree with my assessment too.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:31 pmWell! having said that? any other rsults to post.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:33 pmCan't recall the Sturt v West score but it was about 9 goals the difference.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:34 pmCoorong wrote:Well! having said that? any other rsults to post.
North 0.0 00
Central 0.0 00
1 minute and 20 seconds into the 1st quarter.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:35 pmCentral just kicked a point. 
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:41 pmCentrals 2.1 to nothing
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:43 pmThanks boys. Tonight I barrack for North.
Oh, by the way, I think the result was West 17.13 to Sturt 9.6
CA, want to revisit that assessment.
Oh, by the way, I think the result was West 17.13 to Sturt 9.6
CA, want to revisit that assessment.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:45 pmCoorong wrote:Thanks boys. Tonight I barrack for North.
Oh, by the way, I think the result was West 17.13 to Sturt 9.6
CA, want to revisit that assessment.
That score doesn't suprise me having seen both sides in the last 2 weeks.
People that are picking West for the wooden spoon have no idea IMHO.
They'll be pushing for a spot in the 5 with Norwood, South and Sturt.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:48 pmJust like my smile on the avatar. I bow to your superior judgement. And I really want North to win tonight.
Would love the result of the bays game anyone????????
Would love the result of the bays game anyone????????
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:48 pmI don't think North are going to score tonight, 16 mins in Central 2-4 to North nothing.
I'm expecting a flogging tonight for some reason.
Mind you I expected Geelong to get flogged last week too.
I'm expecting a flogging tonight for some reason.
Mind you I expected Geelong to get flogged last week too.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:49 pmCoorong wrote:Would love the result of the bays game anyone????????
Eagles by plenty.
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:59 pmClose to qtr time.
Central 3-5 23
North 0-3 3
Central 3-5 23
North 0-3 3
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:00 pmanother goal to the dogs
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:03 pmQuarter Time
Centreal 3-5 23
North 1-3 9
Centreal 3-5 23
North 1-3 9
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:04 pmEagles 17.10.118 Glenelg 11.10.76
Would've been a bigger margin but the umpires got invovled after 3/4 time .
Any infomation on an eagles player named Ross Pedersen would be nice to know where we got him from , was worried re our ruck stocks before today (first trial game I could get to today)now I am not so worried the rucks looked great .
The forward line does as pointed out look small but what we looked great after half time .
Would've been a bigger margin but the umpires got invovled after 3/4 time .
Any infomation on an eagles player named Ross Pedersen would be nice to know where we got him from , was worried re our ruck stocks before today (first trial game I could get to today)now I am not so worried the rucks looked great .
The forward line does as pointed out look small but what we looked great after half time .