Page 1 of 2
Matt Cooper

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 7:16 pm
by JessicaRabbit69
Judging by a report on Channel 9 tonight, he could be in a bit of trouble.
He failed to appear in court today after allegedly blowing 0.218 last November.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 9:20 pm
by cd
Truth and what reported are very different - there was a mix up re dates which has been sorted.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:15 pm
by JessicaRabbit69
Thanks for clearing that up CD. Don't know if you saw it, but the TV report was fairly damning, actually.
What is/has the club done about the drink-driving?

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:19 pm
by cd
somethings are dealt with in house and as is before courts no comment re particular case
All clubs with the SANFL support have education programmes and support for players in place

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:22 pm
by JessicaRabbit69
Cheers CD

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:30 pm
by Bluedemon
it was reported in the advertiser that he better front up or he is off to jail. that would be sad as he is the only premiership player that the eagles have

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:33 pm
by doggies4eva
He was only living up to his name.

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:35 pm
by drebin
cd wrote:Truth and what reported are very different - there was a mix up re dates which has been sorted.
Good laugh there CD - That's what all the lawyers sprout in court to save their clients having a warrant issued for the first couple of appearances. One of the oldest tricks in the book!
Wedgie's Comeback?

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:35 pm
by sus
Wedgie you going to have a go at Kookas mate for his adolescent, childish comments? I copped the brunt of it from you for some toungue in cheek comments aimed at the North supporters getting carried away. Is it OK to bag players about sensitive issues like that? I could be forgiven for thinking that bagging all clubs except NA is OK. (Note I dont particularly care what Kookas or anyone else posts - that's not the issue).

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:36 pm
by sus
drebin wrote:cd wrote:Truth and what reported are very different - there was a mix up re dates which has been sorted.
Good laugh there CD - That's what all the lawyers sprout in court to save their clients having a warrant issued for the first couple of appearances. One of the oldest tricks in the book!
But NA would never think of doing anything like it hey Drebs?

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:38 pm
by drebin
It has been done at North - cue Adam Saliba, Tony Antrobus to name a couple I know of!!!

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:42 pm
by sus
drebin wrote:It has been done at North - cue Adam Saliba, Tony Antrobus to name a couple I know of!!!
touche


Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:43 pm
by drebin
Is that a 1st sus? You and I agreeing on something!


Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:45 pm
by sus
drebin wrote:Is that a 1st sus? You and I agreeing on something!

I always have a crack - but you cant win em all!

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:47 pm
by drebin
sus wrote:drebin wrote:Is that a 1st sus? You and I agreeing on something!

I always have a crack - but you cant win em all!
Yes very true!


Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 5:49 pm
by Blue Boy
Is this why he no longer a blue bagger !!! I thought it was just a rumour.

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 6:01 pm
by Aerie
The worst thing that could come out of this is if we lose our 400 million dollar sponsorship deal with the TAC.

Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 6:31 pm
by JK
Aerie wrote:The worst thing that could come out of this is if we lose our 400 million dollar sponsorship deal with the TAC.
LMAO ... Nice!!


Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 7:12 pm
by spell_check
Constance_Perm wrote:Aerie wrote:The worst thing that could come out of this is if we lose our 400 million dollar sponsorship deal with the TAC.
LMAO ... Nice!!

The easiest way to answer to a shit stirrer is to come up with a response like this. Well done Aerie.

Re: Wedgie's Comeback?

Posted:
Thu May 04, 2006 4:14 pm
by Bluedemon
sus wrote:Wedgie you going to have a go at Kookas mate for his adolescent, childish comments? I copped the brunt of it from you for some toungue in cheek comments aimed at the North supporters getting carried away. Is it OK to bag players about sensitive issues like that? I could be forgiven for thinking that bagging all clubs except NA is OK. (Note I dont particularly care what Kookas or anyone else posts - that's not the issue).
sus it is just the truth, i am not a north but a diehard sturt fan. i think sturt might of let him go at the right time with all these unfortunate incidents PLUS i dont like people drink driving, i wasnt bagging anyone but just saying a sly comment about the eagles not winning a flag