Page 1 of 2

R9 North vs Eagles teams

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:47 pm
by Aerie
North League Team

F M.Campbell Weatherley Krieg
HF D.Motlop Gill Younie
C Bamford Wintle Ryswyk
HB Ivens Cox Gatto
B Haseldine Schubert D.Ebert

Ruck:
O'Hara
Howard
Ladhams

Interchange: Waklein McIntyre Edwards

In: Wintle, Gill
Out: Pfeiffer (groin), Kaesler


Eagles League Team

F: COOPER PASSADOR INKSTER
HF: RUGOLO GROCKE WESTBROOK
C: TREEBY CICOLELLA JARRAD
HB: SHATTOCK McKENZIE POTTER
B: POWELL PEDLER FREWEN

1ST RUCK
LINDSAY
VINCE
P. FIACCHI

INTERCHANGE
EARL, FAIRCLOUGH, JACOBS, FLOREANI

IN
RUGOLO, VINCE, FLOREANI
OUT
KNIGHTS, SKIPWORTH (Crows)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:55 pm
by Aerie
Should be a great game on Saturday at Thebarton. North will be strengthened by the inclusion of Gill and Wintle. I'd play Frewen on Gill and have Shattock close by as the third man up when Gill gets closer to goal. Ryswyk killed us last time and Bamford always plays well, but Treeby and Jarrad are in good form. Who comes out on top on the wings may well decide the game. Both defences will be tested with Motlop the danger small man for North and Inkster for the Eagles. If we can close down the wings and keep Gill down to 2 or 3 goals the Eagles can win this one.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:38 pm
by MightyEagles
During the news, they said that Skipworth wasn't playing for Adelaide, so that would mean that he would be an in for the Eagles, not an out. :? :roll:

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:56 pm
by Dog_ger
Chopping Block... Eagles by 81 points.....

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:25 pm
by eaglehaslanded
MightyEagles wrote:During the news, they said that Skipworth wasn't playing for Adelaide, so that would mean that he would be an in for the Eagles, not an out. :? :roll:


Skipworth is listed as an emergency for the Crows so there is every possibility that he may play for the crows so therefore he is not really an in or an out at this stage. Only time will tell. Will know definately tomorrow night.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:30 pm
by eaglehaslanded
Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:48 pm
by RM
eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.


What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.

Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:05 pm
by spell_check
The forecast is for a light shower or two.

I don't think the Eagles can win regardless of the weather.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:41 pm
by eaglehaslanded
spell_check wrote:The forecast is for a light shower or two.

I don't think the Eagles can win regardless of the weather.


Jumping off the Eags already. Very disappointing spelly.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:10 am
by spell_check
eaglehaslanded wrote:
spell_check wrote:The forecast is for a light shower or two.

I don't think the Eagles can win regardless of the weather.


Jumping off the Eags already. Very disappointing spelly.


Not jumping off, just not confident we will win this week.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:57 am
by Mickyj
RM wrote:
eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.


What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.

Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.


RM Grocke will be dissappointed that HARGY is not in mate he kicked five goals on him last time :D

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:27 am
by rod_rooster
Mickyj wrote:
RM wrote:
eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.


What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.

Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.


RM Grocke will be dissappointed that HARGY is not in mate he kicked five goals on him last time :D


Was a good lesson for Jars that Mickyj. He realised beyond any doubt that Hargs is never going to be a defender. If Grocke can kick 5 goals on him imagine what a good player would do :wink:

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:13 am
by Dissident
RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.


Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:27 am
by Rushby Hinds
Good to see Luke Ivens is available this week.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:28 am
by Mickyj
rod_rooster wrote:
Mickyj wrote:
RM wrote:
eaglehaslanded wrote:Should be a crackerjack game. Both sides look really good on paper. Surely Gill can't be ready to play this week. Should be a huge crowd for what would be close to the match of the year so far. My tip the Eagles by about 4 goals.


What would you know about Gill. You are lucky North have "held back" Hargy, White and others for extra recovery.

Its going to piss down and they will get 2500 and 2000 of them will be North fans.


RM Grocke will be dissappointed that HARGY is not in mate he kicked five goals on him last time :D


Was a good lesson for Jars that Mickyj. He realised beyond any doubt that Hargs is never going to be a defender. If Grocke can kick 5 goals on him imagine what a good player would do :wink:


HAHAHA good one RR. You didnt watch his efforts against West ,with a ruggolo or vince etc roving at his feet will be an interesting match to watch !!
Actually Im waiting for the ruck clash myself seeing in round 1 we had no Lindsey .
There are signs that this will be a great attacking game by both teams ,we just need to see if Skipworth is playing for the crows or WWT.
Oh and for the north supporters that think WWT dont play attacking football ron fuller said in the eagles memeber news letter that the experts forget that we play attacking football I am looking forward to a great clash tomorrow.
A very close game that maybe too close to call .

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 1:57 pm
by RM
Dissident wrote:
RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.


Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?


Not defensive at all Dissident. I was asking what would he know about Gill? Hmm, that's what it says doesnt it????

I know it wasnt an attack, if it was I would have a crack back. Bit sensitive are we! :roll:

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:07 pm
by Sheik Yerbouti
Borat wrote:Good to see Luke Ivens is available this week.


Sorry to dampen the thunder, but Ivens had already packed his bags & gone for the weekend when the call was made.
Good try though.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:20 pm
by Blue Boy
eaglehaslanded wrote:
MightyEagles wrote:During the news, they said that Skipworth wasn't playing for Adelaide, so that would mean that he would be an in for the Eagles, not an out. :? :roll:


Skipworth is listed as an emergency for the Crows so there is every possibility that he may play for the crows so therefore he is not really an in or an out at this stage. Only time will tell. Will know definately tomorrow night.


Hes no match winner any way - wouldnt worry to much if you dont have him

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:50 pm
by Dissident
RM wrote:
Dissident wrote:
RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.


Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?


Not defensive at all Dissident. I was asking what would he know about Gill? Hmm, that's what it says doesnt it????

I know it wasnt an attack, if it was I would have a crack back. Bit sensitive are we! :roll:


Sorry RM - just came across that way. Usually in conversation if someone says something and another person says "What would you know about ____", it's almost rude/condesending.

Apologies if you're not rude and condesending :)

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:00 pm
by Mickyj
Dissident wrote:
RM wrote:
Dissident wrote:
RM wrote:What would you know about Gill.


Awfully defensive for something that wasn't even an attack ?


Not defensive at all Dissident. I was asking what would he know about Gill? Hmm, that's what it says doesnt it????

I know it wasnt an attack, if it was I would have a crack back. Bit sensitive are we! :roll:


Sorry RM - just came across that way. Usually in conversation if someone says something and another person says "What would you know about ____", it's almost rude/condesending.

Apologies if you're not rude and condesending :)


Touche Dissident