SA Footy

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:23 pm**

West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:26 pm**

Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Port's should be less than that.Clayton twice and Dolling twice (?)

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:26 pm**

Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Nice guys always come last??

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:28 pm**

You blokes must be lovely.

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:32 pm**

shoe boy wrote:
Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Nice guys always come last??

Not really, North came 5th with Port and West miles below them and you'll find Geelong at the lower end of the scale in the AFL, mind you they "play the game as it should be played!"

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:21 pm**

Wedgie wrote:
shoe boy wrote:
Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Nice guys always come last??

Not really, North came 5th with Port and West miles below them and you'll find Geelong at the lower end of the scale in the AFL, mind you they "play the game as it should be played!"

Westies were miles below North ay

. How far below Centrals and The bays were North.

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:39 pm**

wycbloods wrote:Westies were miles below North ay . How far below Centrals and The bays were North.

I would think of 7 points and 8 percent as miles. Central were only 4 points and no percent behind the Bays. But perhaps we can compromise and just call it kilometres perhaps?

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:05 pm**

Wedgie wrote:
wycbloods wrote:Westies were miles below North ay . How far below Centrals and The bays were North.

I would think of 7 points and 8 percent as miles. Central were only 4 points and no percent behind the Bays. But perhaps we can compromise and just call it kilometres perhaps?

I didn't ask how far Centrals were behind the bays i asked how far are North behind Centrals and the Bays if we were miles behind North?

7 points 8 percent, still only 1 spot on the ladder

.

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:27 pm**

wycbloods wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
wycbloods wrote:Westies were miles below North ay . How far below Centrals and The bays were North.

I would think of 7 points and 8 percent as miles. Central were only 4 points and no percent behind the Bays. But perhaps we can compromise and just call it kilometres perhaps?

I didn't ask how far Centrals were behind the bays i asked how far are North behind Centrals and the Bays if we were miles behind North?

7 points 8 percent, still only 1 spot on the ladder .

Sorry mate, misread your question (that's what you get when browsing on your phone).
I think that North were dozens of miles below Central and the Bays, if they were in Japan, we were in Tasmania!
However many spots on the ladder (in this case 3 or 4) is irrelevent IMHO.
IMHO North were even further behind Central and Glenelg than West were behind North even though they were all a significant margine (ie miles)
Hope that clears it up!

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:01 pm**

Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Fairest, or just 'never caught'?

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:04 pm**

Hey what happened to that Bay player that got reported in the Semi?

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:38 pm**

doggies4eva wrote:Hey what happened to that Bay player that got reported in the Semi?

Found 'Not Guilty" from memory, was in today's Advertiser...

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:21 pm**

one of sturt's was Smith for wiping blood on one of the Gowans jumpers, hardly a reportable offence, no idea why he pleaded guilty.

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:33 pm**

He probably pleaded guilty cause he did it!! But agreed, a pretty soft report.

Posted: **Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:42 pm**

hahaha, never stopped any other players before, must be something to do with character. :roll:

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:29 am**

Yeah, why on earth would a player who clearly did something which was 100% reportable and in clear sight of the umpire plead guilty?

Fair enough be unhappy about it being soft or whatever, but the guy should have known that wasn't legal and the umpire was right there. Report and guilty finding were always going to follow. Them's the rules at the moment.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:15 am**

One of the Glenelg Reports was Mills for Striking a still unknowen person.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:05 pm**

Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Wedgie, just for interest sake, how did the "reports" stack up? Can you put that up too?

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:18 pm**

aceman wrote:
Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Wedgie, just for interest sake, how did the "reports" stack up? Can you put that up too?

I can't at the moment as I'm on my phone mate but they're all detailed on the official SANFL website which is where I got my info.

Its a useless stat, just a little tidbit I stumbled across and got me thinking about the 'fairplay' trophy awarded in soccer.

Posted: **Thu Oct 01, 2009 7:37 pm**

aceman wrote:
Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009!

Wedgie, just for interest sake, how did the "reports" stack up? Can you put that up too?

Got it, interesting!

Port 9
West 6
Sturt & Glenelg 4
North, Norwood,Eagles,South & Centrals 2

SA Footy

Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round