Who should have the Honour......

Which club should have the honour of playing against the magpies for the the magpies last ever game




Wedgie wrote:North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.
Wedgie wrote:North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.
fish wrote:Wedgie wrote:North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.
You never know, Port might make the finals
Barto wrote:You never know, Port might make the finals
Go Legs wrote:
If it happens to be North Adelaide in the minior round as per the schedule, North fans had better hope they do not play finals because their won't be many left standing to go on
Cheers
I hadn't thought of that - I like it.smac wrote:What about a combined side from the other 8 clubs - just to make sure they get pantsed good and proper, give their fans something to remember...
Booney wrote:How can any of you find humour in this? You really would like to see the Magpies die,would you?
I cant believe the attitude of some posters, who I respect, towards this situation.
8 clubs, 1 hybrid, the new kid on the block the boss, yep, it will really still be the SANFL.
nickname wrote:Booney wrote:How can any of you find humour in this? You really would like to see the Magpies die,would you?
I cant believe the attitude of some posters, who I respect, towards this situation.
8 clubs, 1 hybrid, the new kid on the block the boss, yep, it will really still be the SANFL.
I empathise with you Booney. I love the SANFL comp and I don't want to see any of its constituents disappear. I happen to disagree with the merger proposal but I'd still prefer the Magpies to remain in the comp somehow. Perhaps the fact that a Port Adelaide still survives if the Magpies fold explains some of the levity.