Page 1 of 2

Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:08 pm
by Queen Vic.
Which club should have the honour of playing against the magpies for the the magpies last ever game :D :D :D

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:10 pm
by SnappyTom
Dogs.

Then we can finally beat them in THEIR "Grand Final"...

ST...

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:23 pm
by bayman
why not the power ? then they can eat their own :shock: :lol: :lol:

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:37 pm
by Wedgie
North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:57 pm
by NO-MERCY
Wedgie wrote:North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.


I think it should as North are a disgrace! Who are they to disregard the Port merger?

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:39 pm
by CUTTERMAN
it wont happen for another 3-5 years

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:01 pm
by fish
Wedgie wrote:North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.

You never know, Port might make the finals :shock:

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:30 am
by Barto
fish wrote:
Wedgie wrote:North are programmed to play Port last in 2010, there's no reason it should change.

You never know, Port might make the finals :shock:


WHAT!? :shock:

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:47 am
by Go Legs
Barto wrote:You never know, Port might make the finals


"Tell him he's dreaming"

I voted Norwood, obviously, but for a reason, the rivalry between these clubs has for over 100 years been second to none,
play it at Alberton, so we can dance on their grave for the last time.

Only joking, pick a venue that will hold the crowd, then get set for a bloody, man on man confrontation, PAMFC will hold the tradition of never say die to the last man.

If it happens to be North Adelaide in the minior round as per the schedule, North fans had better hope they do not play finals because their won't be many left standing to go on

Cheers

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:47 am
by Ian
Go Legs wrote:
If it happens to be North Adelaide in the minior round as per the schedule, North fans had better hope they do not play finals because their won't be many left standing to go on

Cheers


maybe a Magpies team of old, but not the current squad

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:02 am
by LPH
I voted Norwood but would suggest either them or Westies, reason;

The rivalry built up over many years :D

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:35 am
by smac
What about a combined side from the other 8 clubs - just to make sure they get pantsed good and proper, give their fans something to remember... :D

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:05 am
by Psyber
smac wrote:What about a combined side from the other 8 clubs - just to make sure they get pantsed good and proper, give their fans something to remember... :D
I hadn't thought of that - I like it. ;)

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:40 am
by Booney
How can any of you find humour in this? You really would like to see the Magpies die,would you?

I cant believe the attitude of some posters, who I respect, towards this situation.

8 clubs, 1 hybrid, the new kid on the block the boss, yep, it will really still be the SANFL.

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:49 am
by Dirko
Booney. I'd prefer to have the Magpies in the SANFL as I like Alberton, I like playing the Pies and I enjoy our current winning streak.
BUT the mess they are in is theirs and theirs alone.
No way in hell should they get any more assistance then what Sturt, North or the Bays did when things were crap for them. No way.
If that means it's adios, then so be it. If Port haven't the balls and fortitude to trade out and make the club great again then so be it.

And BTW, if this was Norths situation or Glenelgs, surely your not naive enough to think posters wouldn't be taking the piss and sinking in the boot.

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:54 am
by am Bays
SJABC, I'd hardly compare our situation of going to the SANFL and asking them to review our operations and business plan to see that there are no further improvements that could be made or that we are on the "right track" to the situation that North, Sturt or Port found themselves in it. IIRC we haven't ahd to go cap in hand to teh SANFL for money. HAppy to stand corrected on that.

Anyways I think five threads on this one topic is a touch of overkill, there thread back on track...

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:01 am
by Dirko
True we didn't ask for a handout, but we were still crap......

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:10 am
by nickname
Booney wrote:How can any of you find humour in this? You really would like to see the Magpies die,would you?

I cant believe the attitude of some posters, who I respect, towards this situation.

8 clubs, 1 hybrid, the new kid on the block the boss, yep, it will really still be the SANFL.


I empathise with you Booney. I love the SANFL comp and I don't want to see any of its constituents disappear. I happen to disagree with the merger proposal but I'd still prefer the Magpies to remain in the comp somehow. Perhaps the fact that a Port Adelaide still survives if the Magpies fold explains some of the levity.

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:20 am
by eaglehaslanded
If it did turn out that the Magpies couldn't continue then it would only be appropriate for 1 club that being Norwood to be their last match. They have built up a rivalry that is the envy of all others in the competition. It would be a very fitting way for them to exit the competition.

Re: Who should have the Honour......

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:35 am
by NO-MERCY
nickname wrote:
Booney wrote:How can any of you find humour in this? You really would like to see the Magpies die,would you?

I cant believe the attitude of some posters, who I respect, towards this situation.

8 clubs, 1 hybrid, the new kid on the block the boss, yep, it will really still be the SANFL.


I empathise with you Booney. I love the SANFL comp and I don't want to see any of its constituents disappear. I happen to disagree with the merger proposal but I'd still prefer the Magpies to remain in the comp somehow. Perhaps the fact that a Port Adelaide still survives if the Magpies fold explains some of the levity.


If Port don't get the support from other SANFL clubs & fold it'll give the SAAFL a big boost as the SANFL will lose the support of alot of Port supporters & i have no doubt they'll support Pt Dist, Seaton, SMOSH, Portland etc.
It could spell the end being the 2nd best League behind the Vics. I can see WA forging ahead of SA.