Page 1 of 2

Is it 4 or 5

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:38 pm
by Coorong
According to the Advertisers ladder SANFL now works on a final 4. When was the change made from final 5?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:41 pm
by Wedgie
They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years! :wink:

PS Happens quite often.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:03 pm
by Dog_ger
It's a top 5 Coorong...!

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:05 pm
by Coorong
Yeah I know mate, was just having a dip at a slack paper.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:56 pm
by RoosterMarty
I'm waiting for them to get the SANFL and AFL confused and put in a top 8.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:19 pm
by Blue Boy
The top five must stay

Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:30 pm
by Blue Boy
Wedgie wrote:They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years! :wink:

PS Happens quite often.


4 v 5 last year was pretty good except the result - I still think if only squizz had of played :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:38 pm
by Aerie
Blue Boy wrote:The top five must stay

Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!


Agree. I like our finals set up with the top 5 and the programmed matches the way they are.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:13 am
by Pseudo
Blue Boy wrote:The top five must stay

Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!

I'm all for a final four - despite my mob threatening (weakly of late, I admit) to fill the 5th spot. The only mistake was playing it over 4 weeks. Play the semi finals as a double header I reakon.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:39 am
by Valleysvirgin
Pseudo wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:The top five must stay

Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!

I'm all for a final four - despite my mob threatening (weakly of late, I admit) to fill the 5th spot. The only mistake was playing it over 4 weeks. Play the semi finals as a double header I reakon.



Excellent post.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:47 am
by -
Blue Boy wrote:
Wedgie wrote:They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years! :wink:

PS Happens quite often.


4 v 5 last year was pretty good except the result - I still think if only squizz had of played :wink:


If only squizz and brodie had stayed at North all those years. More finals to us no flag to you

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:48 am
by -
Wedgie wrote:They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years! :wink:

PS Happens quite often.


Dont know if ur joking bout top 4 deserving it last year but sturt were deserving last year and west wernt the year b4. Port deserved it in 03 and they had a 4

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:25 am
by MightyEagles
It was changed back from the f4 to the final 5 because Port missed out, only to miss out with it returned to the final 5.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:27 am
by JK
RoosterMarty wrote:I'm waiting for them to get the SANFL and AFL confused and put in a top 8.


I would welcome this, but I still couldn't be sure if we'd make it :?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:53 pm
by Wedgie
Should be a Top 4 every time Port are 5th otherwise keep it as is. :wink:

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:31 pm
by MUNGO JERRY
yes, I agree.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:10 pm
by Punk Rooster
MUNGO JERRY wrote:yes, I agree.

Boo to Mungo Jerry- I found that avatar, & it was too big for this site!
How'd you get it on?? :evil:

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:26 pm
by MUNGO JERRY
Punk Rooster wrote:
MUNGO JERRY wrote:yes, I agree.

Boo to Mungo Jerry- I found that avatar, & it was too big for this site!
How'd you get it on?? :evil:


Thats right, just because my avatar is better you are claiming it to be yours. How unoriginal. Are you sure your not a snowts lowt?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:00 pm
by Punk Rooster
MUNGO JERRY wrote:Thats right, just because my avatar is better you are claiming it to be yours. How unoriginal. Are you sure your not a snowts lowt?

That's right, i remember you!
Your the guy who has something against the Snouts, probably because they rejected you for being too nerdy!
:P

PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:03 pm
by MUNGO JERRY
Punk Rooster wrote:
MUNGO JERRY wrote:Thats right, just because my avatar is better you are claiming it to be yours. How unoriginal. Are you sure your not a snowts lowt?

That's right, i remember you!
Your the guy who has something against the Snouts, probably because they rejected you for being too nerdy!
:P


and you have some sort of 'syndrome' happening dont you ponky?