Is it 4 or 5
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:38 pmAccording to the Advertisers ladder SANFL now works on a final 4. When was the change made from final 5?
PS Happens quite often.
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:38 pmPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:41 pmThey made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years!
PS Happens quite often.
PS Happens quite often.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:03 pmIt's a top 5 Coorong...!
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:05 pmYeah I know mate, was just having a dip at a slack paper.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:56 pmI'm waiting for them to get the SANFL and AFL confused and put in a top 8.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:19 pmThe top five must stay
Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!
Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:30 pmWedgie wrote:They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years!
PS Happens quite often.
4 v 5 last year was pretty good except the result - I still think if only squizz had of played
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:38 pmBlue Boy wrote:The top five must stay
Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!
Agree. I like our finals set up with the top 5 and the programmed matches the way they are.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:13 amBlue Boy wrote:The top five must stay
Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!
I'm all for a final four - despite my mob threatening (weakly of late, I admit) to fill the 5th spot. The only mistake was playing it over 4 weeks. Play the semi finals as a double header I reakon.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:39 amPseudo wrote:Blue Boy wrote:The top five must stay
Even though my boys wont be there and not even go near falling in to 5th - I think the comp lost abit when it went to a top 4 only !!!
I'm all for a final four - despite my mob threatening (weakly of late, I admit) to fill the 5th spot. The only mistake was playing it over 4 weeks. Play the semi finals as a double header I reakon.
Excellent post.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:47 amBlue Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years!
PS Happens quite often.
4 v 5 last year was pretty good except the result - I still think if only squizz had of played
If only squizz and brodie had stayed at North all those years. More finals to us no flag to you
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:48 amWedgie wrote:They made a judgement call, only the top 4 sides deserve to be there just like the last 2 years!
PS Happens quite often.
Dont know if ur joking bout top 4 deserving it last year but sturt were deserving last year and west wernt the year b4. Port deserved it in 03 and they had a 4
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:25 amIt was changed back from the f4 to the final 5 because Port missed out, only to miss out with it returned to the final 5.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:27 amRoosterMarty wrote:I'm waiting for them to get the SANFL and AFL confused and put in a top 8.
I would welcome this, but I still couldn't be sure if we'd make it
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:53 pmShould be a Top 4 every time Port are 5th otherwise keep it as is.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:31 pmyes, I agree.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:10 pmMUNGO JERRY wrote:yes, I agree.
Boo to Mungo Jerry- I found that avatar, & it was too big for this site!
How'd you get it on??
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 9:26 pmPunk Rooster wrote:MUNGO JERRY wrote:yes, I agree.
Boo to Mungo Jerry- I found that avatar, & it was too big for this site!
How'd you get it on??
Thats right, just because my avatar is better you are claiming it to be yours. How unoriginal. Are you sure your not a snowts lowt?
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:00 pmMUNGO JERRY wrote:Thats right, just because my avatar is better you are claiming it to be yours. How unoriginal. Are you sure your not a snowts lowt?
That's right, i remember you!
Your the guy who has something against the Snouts, probably because they rejected you for being too nerdy!
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:03 pmPunk Rooster wrote:MUNGO JERRY wrote:Thats right, just because my avatar is better you are claiming it to be yours. How unoriginal. Are you sure your not a snowts lowt?
That's right, i remember you!
Your the guy who has something against the Snouts, probably because they rejected you for being too nerdy!
and you have some sort of 'syndrome' happening dont you ponky?