SA Footy

go u tiges lets make a serious charge for 3rd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

it makes a very interesting last 5 or so rounds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It makes this weeks game against norwood very interesting.

Interesting to see the Bays have kicked more goals this season than Norf.

Who said they had no forwards?

doggies4eva wrote:Interesting to see the Bays have kicked more goals this season than Norf.

Who said they had no forwards?

Glenelg have kicked 21 points less than North in season 2006 AND Glenelg have played one more game than North.
Even if North went scoreless in a game they'd still be in front.

Wedgie wrote:

doggies4eva wrote:Interesting to see the Bays have kicked more goals this season than Norf.

Who said they had no forwards?

Glenelg have kicked 21 points less than North in season 2006 AND Glenelg have played one more game than North.
Even if North went scoreless in a game they'd still be in front.

North in huge trouble after yesterday's game and we will be lucky to hang onto a double chance - despite having played one less game than the rest of the contenders.

drebin wrote:North in huge trouble after yesterday's game and we will be lucky to hang onto a double chance - despite having played one less game than the rest of the contenders.

Dreb even for a known pessimist like you that is drawing a long bow....

You have a game in hand on everyone, are three games ahead of 4th, have the 2nd best %age, you play West this week and based on the lat twoo weeks Port in the last minor rd....

I think you are safe when it comes to the double chance mate.....

drebin wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

doggies4eva wrote:Interesting to see the Bays have kicked more goals this season than Norf.

Who said they had no forwards?

Glenelg have kicked 21 points less than North in season 2006 AND Glenelg have played one more game than North.
Even if North went scoreless in a game they'd still be in front.

North in huge trouble after yesterday's game and we will be lucky to hang onto a double chance - despite having played one less game than the rest of the contenders.

Leave the jokes to Punk Rooster please.

Gold Mal Gold....

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:

drebin wrote:North in huge trouble after yesterday's game and we will be lucky to hang onto a double chance - despite having played one less game than the rest of the contenders.

Dreb even for a known pessimist like you that is drawing a long bow....

You have a game in hand on everyone, are three games ahead of 4th, have the 2nd best %age, you play West this week and based on the lat twoo weeks Port in the last minor rd....

I think you are safe when it comes to the double chance mate.....

Maybe but 2004 & 2005 we blew it losing to sides outside the 5. This year is a lot closer - right down to 7th spot. West we "should beat" but then we have WWT at Woodville, Glenelg at the bay, South home, Centrals away and Port at Adelaide Oval. I wouldn't be overly confident with any of those games after West given that all the teams we play (to this date and not knowing what will happen in the next 2 or 3 games) will all be playing for a finals spot or even a double chance and could be more desperate than we are - which Norwood showed yesterday. Not done and dusted yet for anyone but the EAgles at this time.

Must admit I'm confident of North being a top 3 team and I think North should still be looking at a Minor Premiers spot.

Having said that, I was confident for the first time all year yesterday of winning a game comfortably and we all know how that turned out!

% is a huge + in the bays favour to make the 5.....some big wins have helped this cause