Page 1 of 1

David Clarke

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:09 pm
by spell_check
What was the result of the tribunal hearing?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:50 pm
by Rik E Boy
Results are IN: He's 5hite.

regards,

REB

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:55 pm
by redandblack
As usual, the benefit of the doubt. Is that the 3rd time he's been up this year?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:15 pm
by drebin
redandblack wrote:As usual, the benefit of the doubt. Is that the 3rd time he's been up this year?


But he has been suspended both other times for 2 games a piece! Apparently he should have well and truly got the benefit of the doubt the first time but got 2 games??? Just can't work out the Tribunal and their inconsistency but I guess they are part of the SANFL administration and that says it all!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:59 pm
by blueandwhite
The incident he was reported for on saturday was a joke. No free kick paid, the umpire didnt tell him until 15 minutes after the incident that he had been reported. You see the same type of incident 5-6 times a game, especially when the Gowans bros are playing. Nothing in it.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:00 pm
by spell_check
As said above the first report should have at most and going on by what everyone else gets the first time a reprimand, but he got 2 weeks. Now this was the third time he has been up and plenty of other players on all sorts of different cases/would be cased should have at least got a reprimand but weren't even looked at.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:02 pm
by smac
Have to agree with the general consensus - the report was a joke. The umpire watched the incident and didn't even award a free kick. Once he heard the crowd and saw Slade getting up slowly, he decided he had better do something. It looked to me like a 50/50 free kick down the ground at best.