SA Footy

FINAL SCORES @ ALBERTON OVAL

LEAGUE:

Full Time

North - 18.5 = 113

Port - 10.19 = 79

Roosters win by 34 points



GOAL KICKERS:

North - D.Stewart 8, L.Ryswyk 3, N.Gill 2, J.Bennett, S.Mayes, B.Backwell, C.Thiele, K.Thompson 1

Port - B.Mercer, B.Ebert 2, J.Thurgood, J.Clayton, M.Dolling, T.Milera, J.Meiklejohn, J.Robson 1



FINAL STATS WINNERS: - http://sanfl.championdata.com/matches/1 ... mmary.html



REPORTS: Sam Hanniford (North) for a sling tackle



CROWD: TBC




RESERVES:

Final Scores

North - 13.15 = 93

Port - 12.9 = 81

Roosters won by 12 points

All I can say is you bloody beauty!

Little bit pleased with that. Handby must have been alright.

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Handby must have been alright.

25 disposals, 5 marks, 3 inside 50's and 2 tackles

Port got what they deserved, 6 more scoring shots to lose by 34 points. Maybe Bamford should spend more time doing goal kicking practice rather than sacking the reserves coach.
Good to see One Port lose all 4 matches this weekend

Thanks north ....gave us a bit of breathing space

Leaping Lindner wrote:All I can say is you bloody beauty!

Agreed 100% no one can say black and whites didn't put in 100% unlike their bastard child in the victorian league

mick wrote:

Leaping Lindner wrote:All I can say is you bloody beauty!

Agreed 100% no one can say black and whites didn't put in 100% unlike their bastard child in the victorian league

One club - two loses - double your pleasure.

Missing so many easy goals gave us the result we deserved.

southee wrote:Thanks north ....gave us a bit of breathing space

One way of looking at it. Another way is you have another team within striking distance.

pafc1870 wrote:Missing so many easy goals gave us the result we deserved.

Brett Ebert kicked 2.6 - how many of those misses were getable goals?

even more so considering North play South in Round 22 ...

Big Phil wrote:

pafc1870 wrote:Missing so many easy goals gave us the result we deserved.

Brett Ebert kicked 2.6 - how many of those misses were getable goals?

I was always told bad kicking is bad football QED!

Big Phil wrote:

pafc1870 wrote:Missing so many easy goals gave us the result we deserved.

Brett Ebert kicked 2.6 - how many of those misses were getable goals?

6 obviously.

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Big Phil wrote:

pafc1870 wrote:Missing so many easy goals gave us the result we deserved.

Brett Ebert kicked 2.6 - how many of those misses were getable goals?

6 obviously.

You know what I meant TSG, what was the difficulty of them and should they have been kicked

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Big Phil wrote:

pafc1870 wrote:Missing so many easy goals gave us the result we deserved.

Brett Ebert kicked 2.6 - how many of those misses were getable goals?

6 obviously.

Ebert should look elsewhere for his A (V) FL career

if he can't get a game with a team that has been beaten by 303 points in the last 2 weeks then where is he going to go?

Leaping Lindner wrote:

mick wrote:

Leaping Lindner wrote:All I can say is you bloody beauty!

Agreed 100% no one can say black and whites didn't put in 100% unlike their bastard child in the victorian league

One club - two loses - double your pleasure.

No mate your mob beat them in all 3 grades so I make it 4 losses in the weekend for the One Port

dedja wrote:if he can't get a game with a team that has been beaten by 303 points in the last 2 weeks then where is he going to go?

Gold coast or GWS he would be a good pick up at a reasonable price, possibly even the Crows how ironic would that be? personally I've always liked Ebert as a player

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

southee wrote:Thanks north ....gave us a bit of breathing space

One way of looking at it. Another way is you have another team within striking distance.

Yes but not as close as north would have been