SA Footy

North 14. 19 103

Sturt 16.15 111

BITCHES

has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?

encouraging debuts by harms and laube and i think both got goals with thier first kicks in league footy!

cubillo, kurtze, the 1st gamers, tambling, martin and crane before he went off were good from listening to the radio.

no sheedy as well!!

hinge king of the clangers...does glenelg want him back?

Jesus bloody christ Sturt win 5 games for the ****ing year and 3 are against us. NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Jimmy wrote:BITCHES

has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?

encouraging debuts by harms and laube and i think both got goals with thier first kicks in league footy!

cubillo, kurtze, the 1st gamers, tambling, martin and crane before he went off were good from listening to the radio.

no sheedy as well!!

hinge king of the clangers...does glenelg want him back?

Gee your a wanker

I'm going to go out on a limb and say yes, first time ever a wooden spooner has beaten 1 side 3 times in a season, and the #1 reason North don't deserve to play finals.

Jimmy wrote:BITCHES

has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?

encouraging debuts by harms and laube and i think both got goals with thier first kicks in league footy!

cubillo, kurtze, the 1st gamers, tambling, martin and crane before he went off were good from listening to the radio.

no sheedy as well!!

hinge king of the clangers...does glenelg want him back?

no thanks

Common theme appearing these last few weeks with sides poor kicking for goal costing them matches. One area that just hasnt got better through the years, by the sounds of it North missed some sitters.

Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Jim05 wrote:Common theme appearing these last few weeks with sides poor kicking for goal costing them matches. One area that just hasnt got better through the years, by the sounds of it North missed some sitters.

Sounded like both sides missed some sitters Jim.

johntheclaret wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Common theme appearing these last few weeks with sides poor kicking for goal costing them matches. One area that just hasnt got better through the years, by the sounds of it North missed some sitters.

Sounded like both sides missed some sitters Jim.

yeah true but in the last quarter 3.9 is disgraceful when you have all the momentum, cant comment on early part of match as i didnt see/hear any of that.

johntheclaret wrote:Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Nah mate it's a Sturt game, they didn't see a Thring.....

Sturt you champions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jimmy wrote:has a bottom placed team been able to have a bitch before?

That is a good question for spelly...

Glenelg might have done it once. I recall in one of the spoon years the Bays beat South twice during the season. No idea if there was a South win in between, or if the second of those two sealed a run of three, as per the official footysa.com Bitch requirements.

The Sleeping Giant wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and say yes, first time ever a wooden spooner has beaten 1 side 3 times in a season, and the #1 reason North don't deserve to play finals.

Norwood defeated Central District 3 times when were bottom in 1968.

Thanks Sturt

Well done Blues. Couldn't get to the game today but wrapped that we came away with a win and the young kids are progressing well

johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.

HOORAY PUNT wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.

I don't know. I wasn't there

HOORAY PUNT wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.

Wonder if the North people who were getting stuck into Bown last week for king hitting Backwell will come out and say that Backwell is a coward aswell.

Jim05 wrote:

HOORAY PUNT wrote:

johntheclaret wrote:Harms goal came from his 2nd touch.

But for wayward kicking, Sturt could have been out of site by qtr time.
But for even more wayward kicking North could have won it in the end.

3.9 in the last qtr to the Roosters and 23 scoring shots to 10 in the 2nd half.

Sounded like some strange umpiring decisions, and RPH was giving the men in white a right old spray.

Was there a Sturt report for striking Thring?

Not sure but why wasn't Backwell reported . There was no doubt about his pathetic action. Thumped a guy in the jaw from behind and tried to make it look like a spolining attempt ? How the ump missed that is beyond me.

Wonder if the North people who were getting stuck into Bown last week for king hitting Backwell will come out and say that Backwell is a coward aswell.

I'm sure they will, on the say so of one Sturt fan.