Page 1 of 1
Football Photos

Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:22 pm
by Ryan Hothersall
I have only just joined today and would like to share my photos I have taken at SANFL games.
I try to get to as many Eagles games as I can each season.
http://au.geocities.com/ryanhothersall/2006SANFL.htm
http://au.geocities.com/ryanhothersall/2005SANFL.htm
http://au.geocities.com/ryanhothersall/2004_SANFL.htm
I will be adding Round 18 from Noarlunga and Round 19 from Woodville soon.

Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:35 pm
by spell_check
Actually I visited that page not that long ago, and I must say, you must have a camera with a lot of memory on it - there are sh1t loads of pictures in there.

Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:02 pm
by Wedgie
Great stuff Ryan, and great pics too.

Posted:
Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:00 pm
by JamesH
Good stuff Ryan
I also noticed that eagles newsletter used some of you photos last year
footy pics

Posted:
Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:32 pm
by Ryan Hothersall
the 2006 season page has been updated with the photos from Round 18.

Posted:
Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:53 pm
by Dissident
What is your choice of poison, camera wise, Ryan ?

Posted:
Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:58 pm
by Dissident
Canon EOS 30D?
Footy photos

Posted:
Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:26 pm
by Ryan Hothersall
I use the Canon 30D with a 100-400 IS lens for my football photos.

Posted:
Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:24 am
by Dissident
What did the lens set you back ?
And the unit itself ?
Footy photos

Posted:
Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:16 am
by Ryan Hothersall
Camera was $2000 and the lens was $2200. However I did not buy both at the same time. Bought the lens when I had the Canon 300D, then later sold that and bought the 20D and only upgraded to the 30D this year.
Once you have a good quality Canon L series lens, you usually don't sell it in a hurry.

Posted:
Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:58 pm
by Wedgie
Holy moly, puts my $900 Digital camera to shame!

Football Photos

Posted:
Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:45 pm
by Ryan Hothersall
I have now updated the 2006 season page with photos from Round 19.

Posted:
Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:55 pm
by Dissident
Wedgie wrote:Holy moly, puts my $900 Digital camera to shame!

It's the lens that's important
And, costly.

Posted:
Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:33 pm
by CENTURION
my brownie doesn't take photos like them ones!