Pics of North D Port Rd 23 2006
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:01 am
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:01 am
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:17 amYou had the flash on this time. 
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:02 amthose jumpers north are wearing are terrible...
why did they change for this round? sorry if i missed why they wore it.....
why did they change for this round? sorry if i missed why they wore it.....
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:37 amWhen I first saw that third pic, I thought Poulton had broken/dislocated his leg! 
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:43 amscott wrote:When I first saw that third pic, I thought Poulton had broken/dislocated his leg!
Yeah, that's why I inlcuded that one despite being pretty average quality, when I saw that pic the angel of his leg really stood out to me but he wasn't hurt at all.
Jimmy wrote:those jumpers north are wearing are terrible...
why did they change for this round? sorry if i missed why they wore it.....
I dunno, its our "alternate" guernsey which because our normal jumper doesn't get close to clashing with any other teams can only be described as a marketing ploy. Personally I don't mind the idea BUT I think a lot more imagination should have gone into it and something should have been made that would perhaps appeal to kids (a bit like the Power's lightning bolts guernsey) but when this one first came out at Richmond all the kids could say were how much they prefer our normal jumper. Im not a fan of the design and Im not a fan of names on guernseys but I do give the club kudos for trying to be innovative.
Most supporters I talk to would prefer a white jumper with a red vee similar to what we wore in the 30s at one stage as our alternate guernsey as that's a great looking jumper.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:36 pm[quote="Wedgie
Yeah, that's why I inlcuded that one despite being pretty average quality, when I saw that pic the angel of his leg really stood out to me but he wasn't hurt at all.
Perhaps he had a guardian angel!
I see.... you meant to say angle.
Yeah, that's why I inlcuded that one despite being pretty average quality, when I saw that pic the angel of his leg really stood out to me but he wasn't hurt at all.
Perhaps he had a guardian angel!
I see.... you meant to say angle.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:31 pmWhat? No photo's of my banner? Ahhhhh. Bugger. Lol.
Good win for North, but it woulda been a real contest had the umpires not been favoring North all night. If the umpiring was going both ways, it woulda been a game, but it was completely one sided.
Good win for North, but it woulda been a real contest had the umpires not been favoring North all night. If the umpiring was going both ways, it woulda been a game, but it was completely one sided.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:00 pmPortAdelaideProud wrote:What? No photo's of my banner? Ahhhhh. Bugger. Lol.
Good win for North, but it woulda been a real contest had the umpires not been favoring North all night. If the umpiring was going both ways, it woulda been a game, but it was completely one sided.
Umpiring would have appeared a lot closer if Port had been more disciplined, I wasn't at their game last week, but people I have spoken to say they were just as bad then as well.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:27 pmWe did get a lot of free kicks, especially in the first half, the best run we have had in our history i reckon!
If the free kicks were even it still wouldnt have been a contest, we were far too good for Port and if we had kicked straight (especially that 3rd term) we would have won by more. Also if we didnt slacken off late in both halves we would have won by 10 goals.
If the free kicks were even it still wouldnt have been a contest, we were far too good for Port and if we had kicked straight (especially that 3rd term) we would have won by more. Also if we didnt slacken off late in both halves we would have won by 10 goals.