SA Footy

Full time: Norwood 14.16 (100) defeat North Adelaide 7.7 (49)

Norwood were well disciplined. North were a rabble, again.

Listening on line,
Redlegs too good and North crumbled when under pressure.
Too many turnovers, undisciplined in the 1st qtr, and our kick in's from the re-start were terrible.

Still Norwood do seem to be. Class above the rest this year

Get onto Norwood pretty quick, they are paying 0.99c for the $1.00 bet this week, by the time the Grand Final get here they will be paying 0.50 for the $1.00

Is Liam Davis the best contested mark in the League at the moment? Took a couple of blinders today.

Matt Thomas BOG easily, having a strong finish in the race for the Magarey. Hopefully Evsns is ok, poor bloke can't a trick .

North freaking awful, has a team ever gone into finals in worse form ever?
Shoot me.

Thought that was one of thomos quieter games. Fuller was out best and smart was good in his first league game for a long time.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Full marks to Norwood's marketing, I reckon there were more kids at the Parade than the Show today!

North = no intensity, no desire, no gut running and our skills are deplorable.

We would have to be the worst performed team in league history to play finals.

ABSOLUTE disgrace and the club should offer up $14 refund for each of the past 5 game to all it's members for having to support that SHIT!

PS It will take some effort from West, Eagle or Centrals to stop Norwood going back to back.

Did enough but still got a bit sloppy at times especially infront of goals.
Disappointed we put the cue in the rack early allowing North to win a quarter.
Early news doesnt sound good for Evo, a big loss to lose our leading goal kicker heading into the finals

Wedgie wrote:Full marks to Norwood's marketing, I reckon there were more kids at the Parade than the Show today!

Must've been a lot then, as I was at the show at 9am and there was f#cking kids everywhere !

1st half was average a lot of mistakes , 3rd quarter was good Pheiffers torp a highlight . I've seen some good side's over the years , this ones a fair unit .Bad luck Evo.

HEADHUNTER wrote:1st half was average a lot of mistakes , 3rd quarter was good Pheiffers torp a highlight . I've seen some good side's over the years , this ones a fair unit .Bad luck Evo.

Yeah, that torp even got a few rounds of applause from North fans, was a delight to behold!

Who picks North's best players?
Only bothered to name 3 and didnt put the George Thring in there who was your best by a country mile.

Jim05 wrote:Who picks North's best players?
Only bothered to name 3 and didnt put the George Thring in there who was your best by a country mile.

Are you talking about the write up on facebook?
Its just a supporter's summary.

Wedgie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Who picks North's best players?
Only bothered to name 3 and didnt put the George Thring in there who was your best by a country mile.

Are you talking about the write up on facebook?
Its just a supporter's summary.

SANFL site has only 3 players named.
Shannon, O'Sullivan and Amato.

Jim05 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Who picks North's best players?
Only bothered to name 3 and didnt put the George Thring in there who was your best by a country mile.

Are you talking about the write up on facebook?
Its just a supporter's summary.

SANFL site has only 3 players named.
Shannon, O'Sullivan and Amato.

Both Thrings would be in my best along with O'Sullivan. Amato???

Mark Evans rolled an ankle and over cautious trainers used a stretcher to bring him off.
With a week off he is a fair chance to be available next game.
We have seen the emergence of a star during the last 2 weeks...... young Bampton arguably bog in last two games at the age of 17 with the body of a 25yo.

on the rails wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Who picks North's best players?
Only bothered to name 3 and didnt put the George Thring in there who was your best by a country mile.

Are you talking about the write up on facebook?
Its just a supporter's summary.

SANFL site has only 3 players named.
Shannon, O'Sullivan and Amato.

Both Thrings would be in my best along with O'Sullivan. Amato???

Don't forget (as stated in an earlier post) the kick-in's were disgraceful creating Norwood goals and who does these. Yep George. I cannot see how a best spot can be given for someone who set up so many opposition goals??? Maybe a best for Norwood can be argued!!

Too many votes (including umpire votes) are given to the player with lots of disposals. It is the effectiveness and creativity of disposals that should count. Boot to ball straight to an opposing player is a minus to me.

Both Maxi Thring and Amato were also guilty of turnovers and that is not what a team needs from the midfield. They should be drilling their forwards or at the least setting an even contest to allow us to hold the ball in until reinforcements can arrive.

I know Norwood's pressure was great and this creates opposition mistakes, but tooooo many disposals went straight to a blue jumper without a red one to be seen. Eyes need to be checked.