Rumours / Player Movement Discussions for 2014

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Blackwhite » Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:31 am

Will be interesting to see how many magpie players move clubs, I'm guessing the majority of them would.
Blackwhite
Reserves
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:52 am
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 44 times
Grassroots Team: Payneham NU

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:16 am

Brad wrote:Luke Slattery from the magpies back to his junior side Crystal Brook.


Is that happening? I posted that as a joke on FB, mate.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Brad » Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:33 am

Dogwatcher wrote:
Brad wrote:Luke Slattery from the magpies back to his junior side Crystal Brook.


Is that happening? I posted that as a joke on FB, mate.


DW your joke us actually a reality I've been told!
Brad
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: Ceduna
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Crystal Brook

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby beenreal » Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:32 am

Blackwhite wrote:Will be interesting to see how many magpie players move clubs, I'm guessing the majority of them would.


Or perhaps many of them will have higher standards and maintain their support for the Port Adelaide Football Club

And a Rookie listed player earns substantially more than a few hundred $$ per game.
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:02 am

beenreal wrote: Or perhaps many of them will have higher standards and maintain their support for the Port Adelaide Football Club


Now who's got their head in the sand?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby passionatelegsfan » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:15 am

An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?
passionatelegsfan
Member
 
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:55 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:25 am

Former Legs?
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:26 am

Brad wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:
Brad wrote:Luke Slattery from the magpies back to his junior side Crystal Brook.


Is that happening? I posted that as a joke on FB, mate.


DW your joke us actually a reality I've been told!


Then I wasn't joking. I was posting a rumour that turned out to be fact. :lol:
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Alby_Green » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:38 am

passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?

Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.
Alby_Green
Member
 
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Melbourne
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Brad » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:42 am

Alby_Green wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?

Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.


So they haven't really been punished, double standards by the SANFL yet again....
Brad
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: Ceduna
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Crystal Brook

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Apachebulldog » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:48 am

SANFL = JOKE !!!
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby heater31 » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:05 am

Brad wrote:
Alby_Green wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?

Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.


So they haven't really been punished, double standards by the SANFL yet again....



Part of the concessions Norwood asked for to vote yes.....
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16521
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 525 times
Been liked: 1259 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby passionatelegsfan » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:56 am

Thanks people for clearing that up.
passionatelegsfan
Member
 
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:55 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby SDK » Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:19 pm

Wrong again. The concessions were for ALL clubs the proposal to lift Norwood and West's recruiting ban was rejected.
Like all clubs Norwood are allowed to replace the players lost to the AFL reserves side. We can not recruit out of our area still. No change !!!!!!!!!!!!!
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby fester69 » Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:36 pm

Plus all three players mentioned are original Norwood boys anyway!!
We won't need to go on a recruiting spree to secure the threepeat - great depth!
User avatar
fester69
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1072
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:09 pm
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 32 times
Grassroots Team: Morphettville Park

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby sjt » Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:42 pm

SDK wrote:Wrong again. The concessions were for ALL clubs the proposal to lift Norwood and West's recruiting ban was rejected.
Like all clubs Norwood are allowed to replace the players lost to the AFL reserves side. We can not recruit out of our area still. No change !!!!!!!!!!!!!

What concessions were for ALL clubs?
So the lifting of the recruiting ban was rejected, but Norwood are allowed to recruit three players from out of their area?
All clubs have previously been able to recruit players to cover those lost to the afl. Unless they've received a recruiting ban penalty.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby JK » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:12 pm

Alby_Green wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?

Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.


Just the 2 homegrown replacements I believe
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37368
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4440 times
Been liked: 2985 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby dedja » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:32 pm

We are all comforted by the fact the lettuce that the SANFL used to slap Norwood was really, really wet ..
It is better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 20122
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 157 times
Been liked: 972 times

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby Psyber » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:38 pm

Brad wrote:
Alby_Green wrote:
passionatelegsfan wrote:An article in the paper today about Norwood looking to recruit a trio of delisted AFL players. However i thought they were banned from recruiting due to their salary cap breach. Can someone explain how this works?
Norwood can recruit former 'Legs players, e.g., those who have been delisted from their AFL club. Also, can recruit 3 players outside of the Norwood zone to replace the 3 home-grown Norwood boys lost to the filth at Alberton & West Lakes as a result of the AFL reserves fiasco.
So they haven't really been punished, double standards by the SANFL yet again....
Well Norwood were punished for the breach, but later there was a deal done over the entry of AFL reserves into the SANFL which resulted in teams being able to replace players lost because of the AFL reserves forming. Norwood still cannot recruit players from outside their zone beyond this limit.

But they can contract returning former Norwood players.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12212
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 103 times
Been liked: 389 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Rumours and Player Movement Discussions for 2014

Postby SDK » Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:53 pm

You mean the $90,000 lettuce ?
Replacing AFL listed players is a totally separate issue which brings Norwood back to where it was before.
SDK
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 51 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], goddy11 and 19 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |