SA Footy

After all Round 3 matches.

All updated. Plus some team stats...

What did you get for the u16 and u18s Port v Eagles games?

Eagles 86-84 Port for the U18s - seems there's some confusion as to Port's score but I've gone with Champion Data instead of 86-83.

Eagles 80-70 Port for the U16s.

There was an U16s game early on in which North beat Port 136-38 but the SANFL site has 141-38 because the scoreboard incorrectly had that at the end of the game, so I don't normally bother with those scores any more.

I've got 86-84 for the 18s, but got 80 - 64 for the 16s seams that there was a goal that both Port timekeeper and I missed. Still will take the win.

Not surprised the hybrids are getting looked after by the umps.

Yeah, the umpires are definitely adjusting the scores (but not the results) of matches in favour of the Eagles.

Still tinkering with the results I see....until it affects the win/loss outcome of the match, of course.

Lost again Spelly?

dedja wrote:Lost again Spelly?

The only thing I'm at a loss with is why the rules aren't adhered to when the goal umpires cards are final - that's what the scores are. However that rule for the underage matches seems to exist only when changing the scores would change who won the match.

spell_check wrote:

dedja wrote:Lost again Spelly?

The only thing I'm at a loss with is why the rules aren't adhered to when the goal umpires cards are final - that's what the scores are. However that rule for the underage matches seems to exist only when changing the scores would change who won the match.

What rules haven't been adhered to?

scott wrote:

spell_check wrote:

dedja wrote:Lost again Spelly?

The only thing I'm at a loss with is why the rules aren't adhered to when the goal umpires cards are final - that's what the scores are. However that rule for the underage matches seems to exist only when changing the scores would change who won the match.

What rules haven't been adhered to?

I think he's going on about that u18s game last year between Norwood and the Eagles at Norwood, when everyone saw the Eagles score 5 goals straight in the first half and the umpires changed the score to 4 goals 1

MightyEagles wrote:

scott wrote:

spell_check wrote:

dedja wrote:Lost again Spelly?

The only thing I'm at a loss with is why the rules aren't adhered to when the goal umpires cards are final - that's what the scores are. However that rule for the underage matches seems to exist only when changing the scores would change who won the match.

What rules haven't been adhered to?

I think he's going on about that u18s game last year between Norwood and the Eagles at Norwood, when everyone saw the Eagles score 5 goals straight in the first half and the umpires changed the score to 4 goals 1

We'll wait and see what spelly has to say for himself.

All my scores for the season have been confirmed as official final scores, by the way, even if sportingpulse still has them wrong (like Port-North Rd 1 should be 136-38, not 141-38 like the ground scoreboard incorrectly had at FT).