SA Footy

Well I can say I honestly didnt see it, did anyone else see it and have an intelligent comment to make re: the outcome?

Umm, only that I have my fingers crossed!

Summed up well this morning on 5RPH when they stated they thought Parry is just about the most important cog in South's side, much more important than Cupido.

Despite South's poor luck at the tribunal this year Parry has got off twice so it will be interesting.

For those unaware the hearing is tomorrow night.

Wedgie

I thin your right, if south are to progress in the finals Parry will be needed against Hudson

Glad to see you are concerned wedgie......
I agree though, I think we will need him to be competitive against your lot. Hopefully you can play as badly as you did yesterday 2 weeks in a row.....?
It will be very interesting to see Souths reaction if he is found guilty given the events of last week.
Also McConnells account of events made interesting reading in yesterdays mail didnt it?

I didn't see it when at the game, and it was off the ball so the cameras didn't capture it (after watching the replay today). I'm not sure if ABC have any footage of it either (as they didn't replay it after the report), so I guess it will potentially come down to the umpire's word against Parry's.

blueandwhite wrote:Glad to see you are concerned wedgie......
I agree though, I think we will need him to be competitive against your lot. Hopefully you can play as badly as you did yesterday 2 weeks in a row.....?
It will be very interesting to see Souths reaction if he is found guilty given the events of last week.
Also McConnells account of events made interesting reading in yesterdays mail didnt it?

Can you post his comments?

will the SANFL use this to "square up" for the Supreme Court action? (ie Parry gets found guilty?)

Punk Rooster wrote:will the SANFL use this to "square up" for the Supreme Court action? (ie Parry gets found guilty?)

I wondered if Cupido was a decision based on the fact they never find any1 guilty so they thought they had to.

Parry might be a get even for the court case but Cupido was a hang-over from the salary cap breech?

Thats my conspiracy theories

From a North perspective i hope he gets a week but realistically from all reports there wasn't anything in it and he probably doesn't deserve any suspension.

Pleaded guilty and got a reprimand.

GOOD RESULT

Yeah fantastic.

Wedgie wrote:Pleaded guilty and got a reprimand.

Thats the 3rd time this year isnt it??


why do the umpires bother to take out the note book these days. SANFL Tribunal is becoming a joke in the opposite direction to the AFL

heater31 wrote:

Wedgie wrote:Pleaded guilty and got a reprimand.

Thats the 3rd time this year isnt it??

3rd time he's been reported, he was found not guilty of the first two charges so this is the first he's been found guilty.

heater31 wrote: why do the umpires bother to take out the note book these days. SANFL Tribunal is becoming a joke in the opposite direction to the AFL

You might want to talk to Cupido or Clarke about that!

Bring it on!!!!

I can now breathe a bit easier........

Well , it looks like the tribunal can get it right occasionaly. We will definitely need him at his best on Sunday.

Look

The SANFL as far as reports do a great job, the Gowans brothers must have their own locker their (never get time), to be fair, you would near have to rob a bank to get time and its a lot more realistic then the crap the AFL dish up in their findings

dash61 wrote:Look

The SANFL as far as reports do a great job, the Gowans brothers must have their own locker their (never get time), to be fair, you would near have to rob a bank to get time and its a lot more realistic then the crap the AFL dish up in their findings

I love comments like this one. Because they are brothers, they should be treated as one and not two individuals? Look at their records separately and comment again.