SA Footy

Welcome to the sixth year of occupation.

Code: Select all

.............P...W...D.....F......A......%
Norwood......2...2...0....158....150....51.30
South........1...1...0....102.....43....70.34
Eagles.......2...1...0....167....149....52.85
Sturt........1...1...0.....84.....77....52.17
North........2...1...0....160....156....50.63
Glenelg......1...0...0.....64.....69....48.12
West.........1...0...0.....66.....95....40.99
Central......2...0...0....129....191....40.31

Is it a top 4 or top 5?

North with 1 win?

It's a shambles already.

gazzamagoo wrote:North with 1 win?

They beat West on Saturday, pay attention!

Wedgie wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:North with 1 win?

They beat West on Saturday, pay attention!

but dey ain't got no points yet though

Booney wrote:It's a shambles already.

Only nuns drive Toranas, right Ted?

gazzamagoo wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:North with 1 win?

They beat West on Saturday, pay attention!

but dey ain't got no points yet though

They got 2 points for the win like every other team does.

-4 + 2 = -2

It was when I went to school.

Groucho wrote:-4 + 2 = -2

It was when I went to school.

Exactly!

-2 < 0

Therefore, North is below Glenelg, West & Central.
i.e. BOTTOM

Groucho wrote:-2 < 0

Therefore, North is below Glenelg, West & Central.
i.e. BOTTOM

Noone denies that is how the SANFL ladder is currently.
They have one win and have accrued 2 points to progress from -4 to -2.
Gazza questioned if they had a win and denied they had accrued 2 points which was incorrect and confirmed by you. Thank you.

I like Psuedo's ladder as it eliminates 3 bad mistakes made by the SANFL.

Still curious as to if it woukd have a top 4 or 5 as if it was a top 4 North wouldn't have made the finals last year!

OK. Fair enough. I am in favour of eliminating 2 of the mistakes made by the S.A.N.F.L., on the fence on the 3rd one.
There is a fourth one I wish they would correct. I hate how they refer to Sanfull , it is an acronym not a word.

Groucho wrote:OK. Fair enough. I am in favour of eliminating 2 of the mistakes made by the S.A.N.F.L., on the fence on the 3rd one.
There is a fourth one I wish they would correct. I hate how they refer to Sanfull , it is an acronym not a word.

Well, welcome to another season of hearing it multiple times in every break, at every game. They "love football", ya know.

(Yeah, it shits me off too.)

I dont see the point with this anymore. Applaud your initial stance but move on.

Brett wrote:I dont see the point with this anymore. Applaud your initial stance but move on.

Bit rich coming from someone being alarmed at a club booking a private function instead of hosting an after match function. Get with the times and move on...

Brett wrote:I dont see the point with this anymore. Applaud your initial stance but move on.

Lol - keep it up, champ.

Brett wrote:I dont see the point with this anymore. Applaud your initial stance but move on.

Yet....here you are.

heater31 wrote:

Brett wrote:I dont see the point with this anymore. Applaud your initial stance but move on.

Bit rich coming from someone being alarmed at a club booking a private function instead of hosting an after match function. Get with the times and move on...

Didnt your club try this ? Will they remove a club luncheon at Barzaar ? Up with the times .

lol . You still going ?