SA Footy

Barracker1 wrote:What a joke Norwood make of the Salary Cap and get away with it. Just ask any "thinking" SANFL supporter and they will agree that this has ben going on for WAY TOO LONG and sanctioned by a gutless pathetic group called the SANFL. Norwood supporters bleet from the heavens saying its sour grapes and other clubs are just jealous. No not jealous, infuriated that yet again Norwood flaunt the rules and find another way to deceive that SANFL supporter base and arrogantly laugh all the way to CIBO's in the parade. BUT EVEN SILLIER CODY SZUST nominates for the AFL draft. WTF !! He's kidding right.

Barracker1 wrote:What a joke Norwood make of the Salary Cap and get away with it. Just ask any "thinking" SANFL supporter and they will agree that this has ben going on for WAY TOO LONG and sanctioned by a gutless pathetic group called the SANFL. Norwood supporters bleet from the heavens saying its sour grapes and other clubs are just jealous. No not jealous, infuriated that yet again Norwood flaunt the rules and find another way to deceive that SANFL supporter base and arrogantly laugh all the way to CIBO's in the parade. BUT EVEN SILLIER CODY SZUST nominates for the AFL draft. WTF !! He's kidding right.

nwdfanparade wrote:

Barracker1 wrote:What a joke Norwood make of the Salary Cap and get away with it. Just ask any "thinking" SANFL supporter and they will agree that this has ben going on for WAY TOO LONG and sanctioned by a gutless pathetic group called the SANFL. Norwood supporters bleet from the heavens saying its sour grapes and other clubs are just jealous. No not jealous, infuriated that yet again Norwood flaunt the rules and find another way to deceive that SANFL supporter base and arrogantly laugh all the way to CIBO's in the parade. BUT EVEN SILLIER CODY SZUST nominates for the AFL draft. WTF !! He's kidding right.

Take your proof to Channel 7's Today Tonight program and all of South Australia will know of Norwood (alleged) rorting of the salary cap.

Show us proof of your accusations.

Until you show proof, the accusation are alleged.

Dutchy wrote:

nwdfanparade wrote:

Barracker1 wrote:What a joke Norwood make of the Salary Cap and get away with it. Just ask any "thinking" SANFL supporter and they will agree that this has ben going on for WAY TOO LONG and sanctioned by a gutless pathetic group called the SANFL. Norwood supporters bleet from the heavens saying its sour grapes and other clubs are just jealous. No not jealous, infuriated that yet again Norwood flaunt the rules and find another way to deceive that SANFL supporter base and arrogantly laugh all the way to CIBO's in the parade. BUT EVEN SILLIER CODY SZUST nominates for the AFL draft. WTF !! He's kidding right.

Take your proof to Channel 7's Today Tonight program and all of South Australia will know of Norwood (alleged) rorting of the salary cap.

Show us proof of your accusations.

Until you show proof, the accusation are alleged.

bit hard to do that now.....

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.

Nominations are valid for only one year, so prospective draftees need to submit a new nomination form each year.

reppoh_eht wrote:

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.

Nah... https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-11-25/ ... i-eligible

Nominations are valid for only one year, so prospective draftees need to submit a new nomination form each year.

whufc wrote:

reppoh_eht wrote:

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.

Nah... https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-11-25/ ... i-eligible

Nominations are valid for only one year, so prospective draftees need to submit a new nomination form each year.

Not sure where the 'few year' drafting myth come from. Maybe it use to be a thing in the early 2000's but the draft has been very clear for a while now that you are required to nominate yourself on a yearly basis.

southee wrote:

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.

Disgraceful post !

Dutchy wrote:

southee wrote:

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.

Disgraceful post !

Agree, South are actually well ahead of most clubs in player welfare and supporting community issues, they have been front runner in White Ribbon/Domestic Violence awareness.

And if there is any truth to your statement that other clubs wouldn't touch him cause of mental health, even more credit to South that they will, cause if other clubs dont believe they have any players in a similar space they are kidding themselves.

DOC wrote:Three in a row not enough JK you greedy bugger?

I will take three in a century.

If a generous supporter wants to give a player something then that is their business.

DOC wrote:Three in a row not enough JK you greedy bugger?

I will take three in a century.

If a generous supporter wants to give a player something then that is their business.

Barracker1 wrote:nwdfanparade wrote:
Barracker1 wrote:
What a joke Norwood make of the Salary Cap and get away with it. Just ask any "thinking" SANFL supporter and they will agree that this has ben going on for WAY TOO LONG and sanctioned by a gutless pathetic group called the SANFL. Norwood supporters bleet from the heavens saying its sour grapes and other clubs are just jealous. No not jealous, infuriated that yet again Norwood flaunt the rules and find another way to deceive that SANFL supporter base and arrogantly laugh all the way to CIBO's in the parade. BUT EVEN SILLIER CODY SZUST nominates for the AFL draft. WTF !! He's kidding right.


Take your proof to Channel 7's Today Tonight program and all of South Australia will know of Norwood (alleged) rorting of the salary cap.

Show us proof of your accusations.

Until you show proof, the accusation are alleged.


Barracker 1 response to nwdfanparade

PROOF YOU WANT PROOF TRY THIS FOR SIZE [color=#BF0000] A former coach and current assistant coach both stated openly of the rort that has existed at Norwood for years[/colors. Im not fussed whether you believe that or not cos you guys have been in denial for decades. There is no room for the ignorant in football that are clouded by their own judgement. If the SANFL were to make enquiries (and they wont) would that be proof enough for you. Now bugger off

beef wrote:You know some blokes nominate once and then it stays on for a few years right? Maybe same club spoke to him once so he nominated, pretty sure if you ask him he knows he's not getting drafted. You just worry about Broadbents "mental health" issuses at south and why other clubs wouldn't touch him.