by - » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:02 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:22 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:30 pm
- wrote:The peckers have been no lower than 4th since 1998. In 7 of the last eight seasons they have finished top 3 including 5 grand finals.
I believe the hammering they are copping is unbelieveable. They deserve credit for continually bouncing back and putting themselves up there. If you keep presenting yourself eventually you will crack it. Some people should remember the game hasn't been played yet.
The Eagles performances in finals are highly credible. Centrals would be hammering anyone else that got there too. The dogs have been clearly a better side than the Eagles in this era. Two years in a row in knockout finals North have put the question to the Eagles in the second half and both times they have responded with a win.
Why North havn't copped more for thier efforts in the last 3 years is puzzling. To me they deserve the wrath of the football public more than Woodville. North have finished in my opinion in the lowest spot they possibly could have in the past 3 seasons with the ability they have had. I am in no doubt as to who performs better under pressure out of the two clubs.
Lets all make an effort to get out there this Sunday and support our great competition and give these two clubs the crowd they deserve and stop badmouthing the Eagles crowd and start promoting to friends and family.
Eagles you must change your guernsey it is the worst I have seen in SANFL and VFL/AFL history.
For the record I tip the doggies to win by 5 goals.
by Dissident » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:32 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:- wrote:The peckers have been no lower than 4th since 1998. In 7 of the last eight seasons they have finished top 3 including 5 grand finals.
I believe the hammering they are copping is unbelieveable. They deserve credit for continually bouncing back and putting themselves up there. If you keep presenting yourself eventually you will crack it. Some people should remember the game hasn't been played yet.
The Eagles performances in finals are highly credible. Centrals would be hammering anyone else that got there too. The dogs have been clearly a better side than the Eagles in this era. Two years in a row in knockout finals North have put the question to the Eagles in the second half and both times they have responded with a win.
Why North havn't copped more for thier efforts in the last 3 years is puzzling. To me they deserve the wrath of the football public more than Woodville. North have finished in my opinion in the lowest spot they possibly could have in the past 3 seasons with the ability they have had. I am in no doubt as to who performs better under pressure out of the two clubs.
Lets all make an effort to get out there this Sunday and support our great competition and give these two clubs the crowd they deserve and stop badmouthing the Eagles crowd and start promoting to friends and family.
Eagles you must change your guernsey it is the worst I have seen in SANFL and VFL/AFL history.
For the record I tip the doggies to win by 5 goals.
good point, the EAGLES are clearly the 2nd best team in the comp, they deserve to win a flag just due to their consistency, but you have to remember it is easier when they are 2 clubs...... well one taking over the other.........wheres the green??????????
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:39 pm
by dash61 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:39 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:44 pm
by Dissident » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:54 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:00 pm
by Dissident » Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:09 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it will probably go on for as long as there is SANFL, just imagine if the eagles do fluke a win this sunday or in any other year ahead then it will really come out about the two clubs............
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:30 pm
Dissident wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it will probably go on for as long as there is SANFL, just imagine if the eagles do fluke a win this sunday or in any other year ahead then it will really come out about the two clubs............
I really thought more from you MT...
by ferret » Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:48 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:58 pm
ferret wrote:My dear West Torrens supporters. What many of the wankers that refer to the WWTFC as two clubs conveniently forget is that basically the Woodville zone from 1964 to 1990 was part of the old West Torrens area, so I say we are only getting back the territory that was originally ours and still forms part of the one club WWTFC. Under achievers use the tired old expression it took two clubs to beat us.
What other SANFL club has had to put up with the shit handed out to West Torrens by splitting their suburban zone in two (western suburbs and eastern suburbs).
Critical shit should be laid on South Adelaide - they were handed a golden goose (extensively growing southern suburbs and a country area running into their metro zone) and they still under achieve. At one stage during the 2005 season they had 17 imports in their league team, they should be penalised for not playing enough locals or maybe clubs that play locals should be rewarded with bigger handouts from the SANFL or have their salary cap increased to reward the local players. Clubs like Norwood and Sturt also have their country zones running into their metro zones - so much easier to get country players when this occurs - but they still manage to stuff up their on field performance.
by Blue Boy » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:08 pm
- wrote:. Centrals would be hammering anyone else that got there too.
by am Bays » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:17 pm
ferret wrote:My dear West Torrens supporters. What many of the wankers that refer to the WWTFC as two clubs conveniently forget is that basically the Woodville zone from 1964 to 1990 was part of the old West Torrens area, so I say we are only getting back the territory that was originally ours and still forms part of the one club WWTFC. Under achievers use the tired old expression it took two clubs to beat us.
What other SANFL club has had to put up with the shit handed out to West Torrens by splitting their suburban zone in two (western suburbs and eastern suburbs).
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:33 pm
by Dissident » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:57 pm
by Dissident » Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:03 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:North lost the Kilburn area to Woodville which had been a good recruiting zone for us and continued to be for Woodville. Also we lost parts of the area around Tea Tree Gully (WTF ???) to Torrens.
Also IIRC (and I hate to stick up for them) but if Woodville hadn't come in Blight and Huppatz (amongst others) would have played for Port.
by Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:10 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |