Page 1 of 8

Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 11:58 am
by UK Fan
Dogs 3.2 5.4 7.9(51)
South 1.2. 1.4 3.4(22)

Dogs by 29

League trial match result played over 3 quarters

Goals : Dorizzi 2 Richards Trav Grace Whitlum Shaw

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:02 pm
by goddy11
UK Fan wrote:Dogs 3.2 5.4 7.9(51)
South 1.2. 1.4 3.4(22)

Dogs by 29

League trial match result played over 3 quarters

Goals : Dorizzi 2 Richards Trav Grace Whitlum Shaw

Can you have 3 quarters?

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:26 pm
by whufc
Happy to see that score albeit will mean nothing come season proper.

Completely understand it’s only a trial game but where this squad is at development wise getting their hands in the ball, kicking some goals and creating a ‘high performing’ culture is going to be invaluable.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:27 pm
by Brodlach
You’d think someone who quotes numbers so often would know the answer to that and get it right

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 12:40 pm
by RB
goddy11 wrote:
UK Fan wrote:Dogs 3.2 5.4 7.9(51)
South 1.2. 1.4 3.4(22)

Dogs by 29

League trial match result played over 3 quarters

Goals : Dorizzi 2 Richards Trav Grace Whitlum Shaw

Can you have 3 quarters?


Three thirds I suppose.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:05 pm
by Hazydog
goddy11 wrote:
UK Fan wrote:Dogs 3.2 5.4 7.9(51)
South 1.2. 1.4 3.4(22)

Dogs by 29

League trial match result played over 3 quarters

Goals : Dorizzi 2 Richards Trav Grace Whitlum Shaw

Can you have 3 quarters?


They were referred to as periods.. to appease the mathematically inclined. Assume if they have a similar format at Milner Rd they might choose a different name?

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:32 pm
by DOC
There were 6 periods.

South played 55, Centrals similar.

One bad incident in the fifth period with a player knocked out which delayed things.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:36 pm
by northerner
Total of 6 "stanzas" with league players concentrating in first 3 and ressies in next 3.
Dogs 15 goals combined to South 5 goals.

From a Doggies perspective the appetite for a contest was evident and ball handling was surprisingly efficient.
Looked very fit.
Whilst we lack any genuine ruck sized tall we had a lot of guys over 6 foot who may well prove tough match ups.
Aiden Grace used on ball looked a million dollars with Grant and Trav looking very sharp.
Dorizzi had some very good moments up forward and McCormack & Fort worked ruck well as a tandem and up forward.
Beuchner is a sound solid defender which allowed Llewellyn and Montgomerie the opportunity to fly for more balls.
During the second match up, Cowham and McDonald were impressive on ball and George Kendall made sure he impacted on every forward contest.

South were reliant on more short kicking than hands for movement and often missed targets which reminded us all its only February.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 1:42 pm
by southernbulldog
Some good signs but it is only a trial and South couldnt have cared less they will be a lot better in Round 1

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:24 pm
by TDJ44
northerner wrote:Total of 6 "stanzas" with league players concentrating in first 3 and ressies in next 3.
Dogs 15 goals combined to South 5 goals.

From a Doggies perspective the appetite for a contest was evident and ball handling was surprisingly efficient.
Looked very fit.
Whilst we lack any genuine ruck sized tall we had a lot of guys over 6 foot who may well prove tough match ups.
Aiden Grace used on ball looked a million dollars with Grant and Trav looking very sharp.
Dorizzi had some very good moments up forward and McCormack & Fort worked ruck well as a tandem and up forward.
Beuchner is a sound solid defender which allowed Llewellyn and Montgomerie the opportunity to fly for more balls.
During the second match up, Cowham and McDonald were impressive on ball and George Kendall made sure he impacted on every forward contest.

South were reliant on more short kicking than hands for movement and often missed targets which reminded us all its only February.

Dusty Launer was impressive in 2nd game,he won plenty of the ball.
Did his brother Blake play,was listed with number 11 but Jordan Tippins had that number.
Any reason why J.Schiller ,Presbury, M.Neagle, J.Neagle,Thomson ,Pisani,Lange,Habel and East didn't play.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:29 pm
by Al4
TDJ44 wrote:
northerner wrote:Total of 6 "stanzas" with league players concentrating in first 3 and ressies in next 3.
Dogs 15 goals combined to South 5 goals.

From a Doggies perspective the appetite for a contest was evident and ball handling was surprisingly efficient.
Looked very fit.
Whilst we lack any genuine ruck sized tall we had a lot of guys over 6 foot who may well prove tough match ups.
Aiden Grace used on ball looked a million dollars with Grant and Trav looking very sharp.
Dorizzi had some very good moments up forward and McCormack & Fort worked ruck well as a tandem and up forward.
Beuchner is a sound solid defender which allowed Llewellyn and Montgomerie the opportunity to fly for more balls.
During the second match up, Cowham and McDonald were impressive on ball and George Kendall made sure he impacted on every forward contest.

South were reliant on more short kicking than hands for movement and often missed targets which reminded us all its only February.

Dusty Launer was impressive in 2nd game,he won plenty of the ball.
Did his brother Blake play,was listed with number 11 but Jordan Tippins had that number.
Any reason why J.Schiller ,Presbury, M.Neagle, J.Neagle,Thomson ,Pisani,Lange,Habel and East didn't play.


Brodie Hudson (#22) was impressive in the second game. 3 or 4 goals, won lots of contested ball.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:48 pm
by TDJ44
Al4 wrote:
TDJ44 wrote:
northerner wrote:Total of 6 "stanzas" with league players concentrating in first 3 and ressies in next 3.
Dogs 15 goals combined to South 5 goals.

From a Doggies perspective the appetite for a contest was evident and ball handling was surprisingly efficient.
Looked very fit.
Whilst we lack any genuine ruck sized tall we had a lot of guys over 6 foot who may well prove tough match ups.
Aiden Grace used on ball looked a million dollars with Grant and Trav looking very sharp.
Dorizzi had some very good moments up forward and McCormack & Fort worked ruck well as a tandem and up forward.
Beuchner is a sound solid defender which allowed Llewellyn and Montgomerie the opportunity to fly for more balls.
During the second match up, Cowham and McDonald were impressive on ball and George Kendall made sure he impacted on every forward contest.

South were reliant on more short kicking than hands for movement and often missed targets which reminded us all its only February.

Dusty Launer was impressive in 2nd game,he won plenty of the ball.
Did his brother Blake play,was listed with number 11 but Jordan Tippins had that number.
Any reason why J.Schiller ,Presbury, M.Neagle, J.Neagle,Thomson ,Pisani,Lange,Habel and East didn't play.


Brodie Hudson (#22) was impressive in the second game. 3 or 4 goals, won lots of contested ball.

I think you mean Brodie Tuck

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 5:19 pm
by Al4
Thanks TDJ44. I did mean Brodie Tuck. Dunno why I typed Brodie Hudson.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:08 pm
by Big Phil
Al4 wrote:Thanks TDJ44. I did mean Brodie Tuck. Dunno why I typed Brodie Hudson.


He (Brodie) was an ex Central ruckman, who I reckon only played the 1 x League game against the Panthers down at Noarlunga.

Been playing a while now in the Barossa League for South Gawler.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:23 pm
by Spargo
goddy11 wrote:
UK Fan wrote:Dogs 3.2 5.4 7.9(51)
South 1.2. 1.4 3.4(22)

Dogs by 29

League trial match result played over 3 quarters

Goals : Dorizzi 2 Richards Trav Grace Whitlum Shaw

Can you have 3 quarters?

Not sure, but you can be 3 parts & that was me last night…

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:40 pm
by northerner
Al4 wrote:Thanks TDJ44. I did mean Brodie Tuck. Dunno why I typed Brodie Hudson.

One of our Juniors. Booted 2 goals and had 4 contested marks. Not a strong point at Elizabeth in recent times.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:50 pm
by northerner
TDJ44 wrote:
northerner wrote:Total of 6 "stanzas" with league players concentrating in first 3 and ressies in next 3.
Dogs 15 goals combined to South 5 goals.

From a Doggies perspective the appetite for a contest was evident and ball handling was surprisingly efficient.
Looked very fit.
Whilst we lack any genuine ruck sized tall we had a lot of guys over 6 foot who may well prove tough match ups.
Aiden Grace used on ball looked a million dollars with Grant and Trav looking very sharp.
Dorizzi had some very good moments up forward and McCormack & Fort worked ruck well as a tandem and up forward.
Beuchner is a sound solid defender which allowed Llewellyn and Montgomerie the opportunity to fly for more balls.
During the second match up, Cowham and McDonald were impressive on ball and George Kendall made sure he impacted on every forward contest.

South were reliant on more short kicking than hands for movement and often missed targets which reminded us all its only February.

Dusty Launer was impressive in 2nd game,he won plenty of the ball.
Did his brother Blake play,was listed with number 11 but Jordan Tippins had that number.
Any reason why J.Schiller ,Presbury, M.Neagle, J.Neagle,Thomson ,Pisani,Lange,Habel and East didn't play.

Yep Dusty won plenty of the ball. Blake was due to play in the league hitout but was deemed a close contact and was in iso.
They are cousins.
Those you listed had a variety of minor twinges or aren't deemed match fit at present. At least 5 of that list would be playing in our next trial.
Shay Linke was another who wasn't playing and I am not sure on his progress from a nasty water skiing accident back in November.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 9:18 pm
by Big Phil
DOC wrote:There were 6 periods.

South played 55, Centrals similar.

One bad incident in the fifth period with a player knocked out which delayed things.


Who was the South player, Doc and is he okay now?

FYI the Dogs player involved, Cooper Dahms, has been offered a 2 week ban for the incident.

PS - Was good to see you on Saturday ;)

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 9:31 pm
by DOC
Big Phil wrote:
DOC wrote:There were 6 periods.

South played 55, Centrals similar.

One bad incident in the fifth period with a player knocked out which delayed things.


Who was the South player, Doc and is he okay now?

FYI the Dogs player involved, Cooper Dahms, has been offered a 2 week ban for the incident.

PS - Was good to see you on Saturday ;)



I think it was a new lad, Shannon Jones. Don't know how he is. Did not move for a long time.

Good to see you too. Have to say Centrals looked pretty sharp.

Re: Trial matches

PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 9:33 pm
by DOC
Have to say, perhaps biased, 2 weeks seems light on recent reviews. Perhaps not a raised arm/elbow helps him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7VJukR3v0Y&ab_channel=SANFL