Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Dogs64 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:39 pm

18 AFL listed players tonight. Crowd, looks huge, about 20 on the outer side. Disgrace.
Dogs64
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Has liked: 235 times
Been liked: 143 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Armchair expert » Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:41 pm

Why not play it at midnight ?
Darcy Fogarty Fan Club Member
User avatar
Armchair expert
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6734
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 9:18 am
Has liked: 306 times
Been liked: 833 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby stampy » Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:00 pm

these magts are atrocious
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 8138
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 55 times
Been liked: 251 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Dogs64 » Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:13 pm

stampy wrote:these magts are atrocious

Holding the ball was given as dangerous tackle, rubbish.
Dogs64
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Has liked: 235 times
Been liked: 143 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby another grub » Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:14 pm

Doggies looking good
User avatar
another grub
Coach
 
Posts: 9228
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:02 am
Has liked: 152 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby another grub » Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:17 pm

gee that Hayes is a spud
User avatar
another grub
Coach
 
Posts: 9228
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:02 am
Has liked: 152 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby RB » Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:18 pm

Dogs64 wrote:18 AFL listed players tonight. Crowd, looks huge, about 20 on the outer side. Disgrace.
20 isn't too bad.

I've been one of 3 on the outer side at Woodville before, albeit in atrocious conditions.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
RB
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4886
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:45 pm
Has liked: 601 times
Been liked: 845 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby UK Fan » Sat Jul 23, 2022 10:30 pm

Dogs 4.7(31)
Port Bs 6.6(42)

3/4 time
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
UK Fan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5087
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:41 am
Has liked: 1018 times
Been liked: 403 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Hazydog » Sat Jul 23, 2022 10:59 pm

another grub wrote:gee that Hayes is a spud


Maybe so - but he’s one of 10 or 11 that have played at AFL level this season alone… gone through our team a couple of times but still yet to find one…
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
User avatar
Hazydog
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 961
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Paralowie
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 125 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby southernbulldog » Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:09 am

It was a small crowd and the lights werent great particularly looking from the grandstand to the outer very hard to pick up players.
Some of the decisions by the umps were a disgrace .
Unfortunately we copped the power reserves at full strength after they had been rubbish in the past weeks .
We tried hard but the difference between AFL professionals and us was obvious,
southernbulldog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 172 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Booney » Sun Jul 24, 2022 1:05 am

Centrals lost, let's all just be happy with that.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 54328
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 6437 times
Been liked: 9530 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby northerner » Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:46 am

We are clearly a work in progress and struggle linking up with our forwards bit there continues to be good signs.
Whilst the Schillers and Pres are imporatnt, the spread of impact has been much better this season. The defence again was very good; Montgomerie, Iles, Llewellyn and the rapidly improving Buechner are gelling into a solid group and Cowham & Whitelum found plenty of ball.

Ports height around the ground wore us down.. 20 contested marks is a lot, we would get that in a month of footy. Billy works hard, but he is more a tall mid and his ruck craft gets exposed against genuine ruckmen.
northerner
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:48 pm
Has liked: 141 times
Been liked: 279 times
Grassroots Team: Eastern Park

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Vamos » Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:11 am

Booney wrote:Centrals lost, let's all just be happy with that.


Chortle
Whoops, there goes another year. Whoops, there goes another pint of beer.
Vamos
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2021 12:55 am
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 155 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby southernbulldog » Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:30 am

Booney up and about just because his team of AFL wannabes & hasbeens beat a proper SANFL club.
southernbulldog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 172 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Booney » Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:07 pm

southernbulldog wrote:Booney up and about just because his team of AFL wannabes & hasbeens beat a proper SANFL club.


You don't play SANFL standard though.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 54328
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 6437 times
Been liked: 9530 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Wedgie » Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:08 pm

Booney wrote:
southernbulldog wrote:Booney up and about just because his team of AFL wannabes & hasbeens beat a proper SANFL club.


You don't play SANFL standard though.

Speaking of SANFL standard at least they got within 20 goals of their opponent. ;)
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 48992
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 1648 times
Been liked: 3480 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby southernbulldog » Sun Jul 24, 2022 1:19 pm

As Wedgie pointed out obviously you did against North .
southernbulldog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 172 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby southernbulldog » Sun Jul 24, 2022 5:59 pm

What no response Booney about your effort against North being up to SANFL standard
southernbulldog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 172 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby Booney » Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:36 pm

southernbulldog wrote:What no response Booney about your effort against North being up to SANFL standard


Like Centrals last night we had lots of players not up to SANFL standard that day.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 54328
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 6437 times
Been liked: 9530 times

Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves

Postby southernbulldog » Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:45 pm

Doesnt say much for your power reserves players they should be above SANFL level .
southernbulldog
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 172 times
Grassroots Team: Brighton District & OS

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests