Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:39 pm18 AFL listed players tonight. Crowd, looks huge, about 20 on the outer side. Disgrace.
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:39 pmRe: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 8:41 pmWhy not play it at midnight ?
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:00 pmthese magts are atrocious
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:13 pmstampy wrote:these magts are atrocious
Holding the ball was given as dangerous tackle, rubbish.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:14 pmDoggies looking good
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:17 pmgee that Hayes is a spud
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:18 pm20 isn't too bad.Dogs64 wrote:18 AFL listed players tonight. Crowd, looks huge, about 20 on the outer side. Disgrace.
I've been one of 3 on the outer side at Woodville before, albeit in atrocious conditions.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 10:30 pmDogs 4.7(31)
Port Bs 6.6(42)
3/4 time
Port Bs 6.6(42)
3/4 time
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 10:59 pmanother grub wrote:gee that Hayes is a spud
Maybe so - but he’s one of 10 or 11 that have played at AFL level this season alone… gone through our team a couple of times but still yet to find one…
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:09 amIt was a small crowd and the lights werent great particularly looking from the grandstand to the outer very hard to pick up players.
Some of the decisions by the umps were a disgrace .
Unfortunately we copped the power reserves at full strength after they had been rubbish in the past weeks .
We tried hard but the difference between AFL professionals and us was obvious,
Some of the decisions by the umps were a disgrace .
Unfortunately we copped the power reserves at full strength after they had been rubbish in the past weeks .
We tried hard but the difference between AFL professionals and us was obvious,
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 1:05 amCentrals lost, let's all just be happy with that.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 8:46 amWe are clearly a work in progress and struggle linking up with our forwards bit there continues to be good signs.
Whilst the Schillers and Pres are imporatnt, the spread of impact has been much better this season. The defence again was very good; Montgomerie, Iles, Llewellyn and the rapidly improving Buechner are gelling into a solid group and Cowham & Whitelum found plenty of ball.
Ports height around the ground wore us down.. 20 contested marks is a lot, we would get that in a month of footy. Billy works hard, but he is more a tall mid and his ruck craft gets exposed against genuine ruckmen.
Whilst the Schillers and Pres are imporatnt, the spread of impact has been much better this season. The defence again was very good; Montgomerie, Iles, Llewellyn and the rapidly improving Buechner are gelling into a solid group and Cowham & Whitelum found plenty of ball.
Ports height around the ground wore us down.. 20 contested marks is a lot, we would get that in a month of footy. Billy works hard, but he is more a tall mid and his ruck craft gets exposed against genuine ruckmen.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:11 amBooney wrote:Centrals lost, let's all just be happy with that.
Chortle
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 10:30 amBooney up and about just because his team of AFL wannabes & hasbeens beat a proper SANFL club.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:07 pmsouthernbulldog wrote:Booney up and about just because his team of AFL wannabes & hasbeens beat a proper SANFL club.
You don't play SANFL standard though.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 12:08 pmBooney wrote:southernbulldog wrote:Booney up and about just because his team of AFL wannabes & hasbeens beat a proper SANFL club.
You don't play SANFL standard though.
Speaking of SANFL standard at least they got within 20 goals of their opponent.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 1:19 pmAs Wedgie pointed out obviously you did against North .
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 5:59 pmWhat no response Booney about your effort against North being up to SANFL standard
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:36 pmsouthernbulldog wrote:What no response Booney about your effort against North being up to SANFL standard
Like Centrals last night we had lots of players not up to SANFL standard that day.
Re: Round 16 Dogs vs Power Reserves
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2022 6:45 pmDoesnt say much for your power reserves players they should be above SANFL level .