SA Footy

Im not playing football because I might get injured.....

another grub wrote:Im not playing football because I might get injured.....

When an injury is the difference between playing for $1000 a week or playing for $4500 a week plus contract of around 400k per year.

MW wrote:

another grub wrote:Im not playing football because I might get injured.....

When an injury is the difference between playing for $1000 a week or playing for $4500 a week plus contract of around 400k per year.

He's still under contract though

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

MW wrote:

another grub wrote:Im not playing football because I might get injured.....

When an injury is the difference between playing for $1000 a week or playing for $4500 a week plus contract of around 400k per year.

He's still under contract though

What's a contract these days...
you'll only have Crows and Port for a few more years...AFL reserves would not be far away

MW wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

MW wrote:

another grub wrote:Im not playing football because I might get injured.....

When an injury is the difference between playing for $1000 a week or playing for $4500 a week plus contract of around 400k per year.

He's still under contract though

What's a contract these days...
you'll only have Crows and Port for a few more years...AFL reserves would not be far away

Won’t happen until Tasmania comes in and then possibly a couple of years after that.
Still stuck with them for a while yet so need to change the rules to weaken them further

Hazydog wrote:Crows ripped off for a legitimite goal

Do you mean Michael Wright's lie-down kick across the line after he illegally dropped the ball on the ground while being tackled? Incorrect disposal would be the argument by some umps, meaning that should've been a free kick for Sturt.

BD1 wrote:

Hazydog wrote:Crows ripped off for a legitimite goal

Do you mean Michael Wright's lie-down kick across the line after he illegally dropped the ball on the ground while being tackled? Incorrect disposal would be the argument by some umps, meaning that should've been a free kick for Sturt.

Micheal Wright.. takes me back a few years!

Hazydog wrote:

BD1 wrote:

Hazydog wrote:Crows ripped off for a legitimite goal

Do you mean Michael Wright's lie-down kick across the line after he illegally dropped the ball on the ground while being tackled? Incorrect disposal would be the argument by some umps, meaning that should've been a free kick for Sturt.

Micheal Wright.. takes me back a few years!

Haha. Yes. There's only one Michael Wright, as the song went.
What's this one's name. Matthew?

And he cops 2 matches Early Guilty Plea: 1 match. Soft as suspension.
Adelaide’s Matt Wright has been offered a one-match ban with an early guilty plea for engaging in rough conduct with Sturt’s Will Coomblas in the Qualifying Final at Adelaide Oval on Sunday.

Matt Wright (Adelaide) – Rough Conduct (High Bump)

Conduct: Careless

Contact: High

Impact: Medium

Base Sanction: 2 matches

Early Guilty Plea: 1 match


https://youtu.be/nFzX0mG8ywc