Page 1 of 2
Final Five in 2007 - Any new contestants?

Posted:
Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:37 pm
by Squawk
There is an old cliche that each year one new team makes the finals and one drops out. If that is to be the case, which team will go in to the five in your view and which one would drop out?
From memory, Eagles, Central, North, South and Port made the finals in 06. Glenelg, West, Norwood and Sturt did not get in.
I would reckon Glenelg in at the expense of South if this 'formula' were to be correct. (Port seemed to have been able to get some good recruits and hence I think they can stay in, whilst South have lost a few key players from their admirable campaign in 2006). West will be one to watch though as well and Norwood have a good list on paper but have struggled with consistency and have a fairly tough draw in 07 IMHO.

Posted:
Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:45 pm
by Aerie
I think Glenelg will replace Port in the 5.

Posted:
Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:59 pm
by TroyGFC
Its funny how people try and predict the top five at this early stage of season when all 9 teams should be gunning for a 5 spot. But FWIW Ill go Eagles, North, Glenelg, Norwood and Port in that order.

Posted:
Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:50 pm
by sturt1
TroyGFC wrote:Its funny how people try and predict the top five at this early stage of season when all 9 teams should be gunning for a 5 spot. But FWIW Ill go Eagles, North, Glenelg, Norwood and Port in that order.
That is very funny


Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:46 am
by Squawk
TroyGFC wrote:Its funny how people try and predict the top five at this early stage of season when all 9 teams should be gunning for a 5 spot. But FWIW Ill go Eagles, North, Glenelg, Norwood and Port in that order.
No one has a crystal ball - just a hypothetical topic I guess. Interesting that you don't think last years runners ups - Centrals - will back up with any decent form in 07?

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:29 am
by Jimmy
well, i hope south can alteast make it to the PF this time around...it will be good for their fans...so they wont drop out...dont think anyone will drop out this year i reckon

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:30 am
by Wedgie
I can't see it changing from last year to tell the truth.

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:35 am
by redandblack
South's squad, at last, hasn't changed much and their losses are at least covered by their gains.
They would be disappointed if they weren't in the top three.

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:41 am
by Rik E Boy
Wedgie wrote:I can't see it changing from last year to tell the truth.
My totally objective view is Legs in for Port!!
regards,
REB

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:07 am
by MightyEagles
Glenelg might get in over South.

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:00 am
by Ian
The only change to 2006, Glenelg could replace either South or Port......but I don't think so.

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:03 am
by westcoastpanther
South have three ins and three outs
Cupido out, Prendergast in = solid gain
Davey out, McGrath in = break even, maybe gain
Krueger out, Maddox in = can't guage, but not going to influence a top 5 result
If we can't improve with a slightly improved list and another year of these guys playing together, I'll be shitty!!

Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:09 am
by Booney
Rik E Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:I can't see it changing from last year to tell the truth.
My totally objective view is Legs in for Port!!
regards,
REB
Open the
other eye!


Posted:
Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:11 am
by Aerie
westcoastpanther wrote:South have three ins and three outs
Cupido out, Prendergast in = solid gain
Davey out, McGrath in = break even, maybe gain
Krueger out, Maddox in = can't guage, but not going to influence a top 5 result
If we can't improve with a slightly improved list and another year of these guys playing together, I'll be shitty!!
I think this is a big bonus for South - they've had a stable coaching staff and now a stable list. I expect them to make a serious play for the Grand Final along with North this year.

Posted:
Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:24 am
by Jimmy
westcoastpanther wrote:South have three ins and three outs
Cupido out, Prendergast in = solid gain
Davey out, McGrath in = break even, maybe gain
Krueger out, Maddox in = can't guage, but not going to influence a top 5 result
If we can't improve with a slightly improved list and another year of these guys playing together, I'll be shitty!!
even more shitty than you already are?


Posted:
Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:33 am
by sturt1
Jimmy wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:South have three ins and three outs
Cupido out, Prendergast in = solid gain
Davey out, McGrath in = break even, maybe gain
Krueger out, Maddox in = can't guage, but not going to influence a top 5 result
If we can't improve with a slightly improved list and another year of these guys playing together, I'll be shitty!!
even more shitty than you already are?

How good was Alwyn Davey last night against the Allstars. That kid should have been recognised as an afl player alot earlier. I know there is a long way to go, but...............

Posted:
Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:49 am
by Snaggletooth Tiger
sturt1 wrote:How good was Alwyn Davey last night against the Allstars. That kid should have been recognised as an afl player alot earlier. I know there is a long way to go, but...............
I'm looking forward to the quick little fella's contribution this year to the Mighty Bombers!


Posted:
Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:14 pm
by sturt1
Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:sturt1 wrote:How good was Alwyn Davey last night against the Allstars. That kid should have been recognised as an afl player alot earlier. I know there is a long way to go, but...............
I'm looking forward to the quick little fella's contribution this year to the Mighty Bombers!

A huge gain for Essendon. You could see when he played for South he was a class act and still very young.

Posted:
Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:31 pm
by Dog_ger
Eagles
Roosters
Magpies
Legs
Bays
Any team that ends with an "S"
Lol

Posted:
Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:21 pm
by magpie in the 80's
Dog_ger wrote:Eagles
Roosters
Magpies
Legs
Bays
Any team that ends with an "S"
Lol
PANTHER...S
CENTRAL...S
DOUBLE BLUE...S
WESTIE....S