Page 1 of 1

Elizabeth Oval naming rights deal finished

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:21 pm
by Dogsbody
NAP Finance has decided to pull out of the ground naming rights deal with the Doggies, but will remain a major sponsor of the club. The company is hoping to open relations with other clubs. From the News Review Messenger 14/12/05...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CAUGHT NAPPING -- Doggies lose naming rights sponsor
By Greg Barila

Elizabeth Oval has reverted to its old name after NAP Finance decided against renewing its naming rights sponsorship for a fifth year. Central District Football Club has confirmed the naming rights arrangement for its Goodman Rd headquarters has ended and the club is looking for a new sponsor.

NAP state manager Gary Stewart, a passionate and lifelong Dogs' supporter confirmed his family's home loans company had decided against retaining the naming rights for the 2006 SANFL home and away season but would continue to be a major sponsor of the Dogs. "(But) at what level, we don't know yet," Mr Stewart said.

Neither the footy club or NAP Finance would disclose how much the four-year naming rights deal had been worth to the Dogs. Mr Stewart said the Adelaide-based NAP Finance had become a national company since signing with the Dogs, with interests in Victoria, Queensland and the Northern Territory. "It's unfair to spend such a large proportion of our marketing dollars in one area. I don't mean any disrespect, I still live in the northern suburbs."

Mr Stewart said being a high-profile sponsor of one club was restricting the company's ability to do business with other parties, particularly with other SANFL clubs. "We alienated ourselves from eight other league clubs becasue we'd been approached by other clubs for sponsorship," he said.

Mr. Stewart said he and younger brother Nathan had felt a personal conflict in ending the naming rights deal with Centrals as both were lifelong supporters. "The whole family is," he said. "We both were raised in the northern suburbs, went to school there. The initial sponsorship, to be completely honest, was based on emotion, absolute emotion. We loved the club and loved them with a passion."

For personal reasons NAP Finance would continue to support the club financially, Mr Stewart said, but without the profile. Central District director Glen Armstrong said the club fully understood NAP's decision. "They have to spread their advertising budget, of coure, across the eastern states now," he said. He said the decision would not hurt the Dogs financially, even if the club could not find a new naming rights sponsor for 2006.

"Obviously we'd like to (find a new sponsor) as soon as we possibly can, it may not eventuate at all," he said. "Our sponsorship in season 2006 is growing financially on the back of our three premierships in a row. Our sponsorship will more than cover the oval naming rights because they're (NAP) continuing on, don't forget, as a major sponsor." Mr Armstrong said the club has scheduled a series of Saturday night games under new lights in 2006, which may be a drawcard for a new sponsor.

SANFL general manager football operations Glen Rosser said football clubs could call their home grounds whatever they wanted. "It makes no difference to us," Mr Rosser said. He said 'Elizabeth Oval' had been printed in the 2006 draw for Centrals home games and it was too late to amend it, even if the Dogs secured a new naming right sponsor for the new season.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good thing they're not completely out of the picture... so much for 'kraP PAN', eh U LEGS? :P

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:08 pm
by duncs7
Great news
It will always be Elizabeff oval 2 me!
Same with Footy Park.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:24 pm
by Sam_goUUUdogs
excellent, not that i overly called it NAP Oval anyway.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:24 am
by Grand Central
A touch embarrassing for the club. What many wouldn't know is that the yearly lease of Elizabeth Oval with the City of Playford was bumped up markedly due to the naming rights income. Somehow I don't think it will be reduced five years later and the club is stuck with it.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:58 am
by Booney
Should have been called NAP PARK any way. ( KRAP PAN)

Re: Elizabeth Oval naming rights deal finished

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:41 pm
by U LEGS
Dogsbody wrote:Good thing they're not completely out of the picture... so much for 'kraP PAN', eh U LEGS? :P


Oh well. Elithabeff Oval it is! :lol:

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:52 pm
by doggies4eva
We could call it GAF Oval - Got All the Flags

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:13 pm
by Dog_ger
Why should it revert to plain old booring Elizabeth oval...? Come on GrandCentral spice it up a little ......!!!!!!!

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:13 pm
by Sam_goUUUdogs
I would love to see the grandstand renamed ''The Danny Hulm Stand''

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:23 pm
by Dog_ger
Even if the club has a draw from club memberships with the winning drawn name having oval naming rights for 12 months...! Think about it .............! :-k

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:18 pm
by Brucetiki
Dog_ger wrote:Even if the club has a draw from club memberships with the winning drawn name having oval naming rights for 12 months...! Think about it .............! :-k


Only problem is it may become another Kardinia Park - too much name changing.

I'm sure Centrals will find another naming rights sponsor quick enough - if someone's willing to associate themselves with a cow paddock like Norwood then there should be no problems with naming rights for Elizabeth

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:22 pm
by Sam_goUUUdogs
HOLDEN PARK :D

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:15 am
by topsywaldron
Personally I always liked the notion of Elizabeth Oval being named after a company who were accused of laundering money. And while that all blew over pretty quickly I always thought it rang kind of true.

After all, CDFC have been laundering player wages through Grand Central for years now.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 12:52 pm
by MightyEagles
How about Centrelink Oval? Well it is only across the road.
It's a joke for anyone who doesn't understand.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:25 pm
by Rooster_cracker
MightyEagles wrote:How about Centrelink Oval? Well it is only across the road.
It's a joke for anyone who doesn't understand.


THATS GOLD :lol: :D :lol: :D :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 4:47 pm
by stan
As long as you oval isnt called something stupid then naming rights arnt a big issue. The club will pretty much do whats best for the clubs. so Centrelink oval sounds good :)