Page 1 of 1
CLAYTON-STEINBERNER-WIGGINS

Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:31 pm
by mal
Picked up the Advertiser to read the gossip and no mention on the 3 players
CLAYTON
------------
Jeremy CLAYTON was according to the radio and by a Port official reported
against WWT.
Ive chatted to a couple of PA barrackers and betwen 2-5 weeks is likely
No mention in the Doug Robertson article[he is the best writer by a mile]
Doug is always on the ball, but no mention ????????????????????????????????
STEINBERNER
-----------------
Is he having a shoulder operation in May ????????????????????????????????????
According to Warren Partland he quotes " here are some names to ponder-"
Included in those names is STEINBERNER [names mentioned as injured etc and to come into the team]
Is he having the op, or is Partland not privvy to that information
But then again he did say CD would miss the 5 two years ago, and they won the flag !!!!
WIGGINS
------------
No mention of his performance on saturday.
There were 12 pages dedicated to the AFL
I suppose with only 2 pages allocated for the SANFL thats all we could expect

Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:23 pm
by Jimmy
if going by whats on the tisers website about the sanfl, its pathetic! we deserve more than that crap.
Re: CLAYTON-STEINBERNER-WIGGINS

Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:45 pm
by Blue Boy
mal wrote:Picked up the Advertiser to read the gossip and no mention on the 3 players
CLAYTON
------------
Jeremy CLAYTON was according to the radio and by a Port official reported
against WWT.
Ive chatted to a couple of PA barrackers and betwen 2-5 weeks is likely
No mention in the Doug Robertson article[he is the best writer by a mile]
Doug is always on the ball, but no mention ????????????????????????????????
STEINBERNER
-----------------
Is he having a shoulder operation in May ????????????????????????????????????
According to Warren Partland he quotes " here are some names to ponder-"
Included in those names is STEINBERNER [names mentioned as injured etc and to come into the team]
Is he having the op, or is Partland not privvy to that information
But then again he did say CD would miss the 5 two years ago, and they won the flag !!!!
WIGGINS
------------
No mention of his performance on saturday.
There were 12 pages dedicated to the AFL
I suppose with only 2 pages allocated for the SANFL thats all we could expect
Hey Mal
Wiggins performance was on Sunday - you dont want to become as bad as the advertiser with your reporting do you ???

Re: CLAYTON-STEINBERNER-WIGGINS

Posted:
Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:02 pm
by mal
Blue Boy wrote:mal wrote:Picked up the Advertiser to read the gossip and no mention on the 3 players
CLAYTON
------------
Jeremy CLAYTON was according to the radio and by a Port official reported
against WWT.
Ive chatted to a couple of PA barrackers and betwen 2-5 weeks is likely
No mention in the Doug Robertson article[he is the best writer by a mile]
Doug is always on the ball, but no mention ????????????????????????????????
STEINBERNER
-----------------
Is he having a shoulder operation in May ????????????????????????????????????
According to Warren Partland he quotes " here are some names to ponder-"
Included in those names is STEINBERNER [names mentioned as injured etc and to come into the team]
Is he having the op, or is Partland not privvy to that information
But then again he did say CD would miss the 5 two years ago, and they won the flag !!!!
WIGGINS
------------
No mention of his performance on saturday.
There were 12 pages dedicated to the AFL
I suppose with only 2 pages allocated for the SANFL thats all we could expect
Hey Mal
Wiggins performance was on Sunday - you dont want to become as bad as the advertiser with your reporting do you ???

hahaha

Posted:
Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:18 am
by G
Mal, wouldnt you think 'the best writer by a mile' might have picked up on an incident that Port supporters are suggesting may cost Clayton 2 or more games. After all, why would you bother mentioning a key player and a former Magarey Medal winner being reported.

Posted:
Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:33 pm
by Jar Man Out
J Clayton was found guilty but given a reprimand. WTF !!!