SA Footy

Clayton, found guilty but received a reprimand because of good record.
Wiggins, not guilty but someone who works with the Weed said the news is it was still Wiggo's last game for Westies last week.

The 5RHP team were close when they said 5 or 6 weeks for Jezza! Good to see him get off, although he is no chance for the Mag Medall. If you kick 6 goals and get 30+ possessions in a winning game and still cant get a vote.... maybe he needs to talk to the umpires more!

pafc1870 wrote:The 5RHP team were close when they said 5 or 6 weeks for Jezza! Good to see him get off, although he is no chance for the Mag Medall. If you kick 6 goals and get 30+ possessions in a winning game and still cant get a vote.... maybe he needs to talk to the umpires more!

Yeah, from all reports it was much worse than the Sporn or Westhoff incidents, great to see the consitency already creeping out of the tribunal by Rd 2.

Wedgie wrote:

pafc1870 wrote:The 5RHP team were close when they said 5 or 6 weeks for Jezza! Good to see him get off, although he is no chance for the Mag Medall. If you kick 6 goals and get 30+ possessions in a winning game and still cant get a vote.... maybe he needs to talk to the umpires more!

Yeah, from all reports it was much worse than the Sporn or Westhoff incidents, great to see the consitency already creeping out of the tribunal by Rd 2.

the tribunal usually are consistant, you are either not guilty and get off, or are guilty and get a reprimand!

pafc1870 wrote:the tribunal usually are consistant, you are either not guilty and get off, or are guilty and get a reprimand!

Tell that to Sporn and Westhoff! The tribunal seemed to be setting a stance for the new year which has gone out the window already.

Happened early last year with the Clarke suspension, tribunal at least provides a bit of humour for the week (unless it's one of your own going up)

Constance_Perm wrote:Happened early last year with the Clarke suspension, tribunal at least provides a bit of humour for the week (unless it's one of your own going up)

Or, CP, if your club (Sturt) is coming up against the side the player who got off plays for (Port). With the likely outs from our ruck division this week, we certainly could have done with Jezza enjoying a little holiday.

Boo the tribunal.

His good record in the sanfl was only 1 season more than Westhoffs - and Westhoff didn't spend last year abusing umpires.

MST wrote:

Constance_Perm wrote:Happened early last year with the Clarke suspension, tribunal at least provides a bit of humour for the week (unless it's one of your own going up)

Or, CP, if your club (Sturt) is coming up against the side the player who got off plays for (Port). With the likely outs from our ruck division this week, we certainly could have done with Jezza enjoying a little holiday.

Boo the tribunal.

my thoughts exactly, i actually started to think about this game with him missing...

thanks for nothing jerks.

smac wrote:His good record in the sanfl was only 1 season more than Westhoffs - and Westhoff didn't spend last year abusing umpires.

Yeah fair call mate, I commented to a friend this morning that I'd bet Westhoff wouldn't be too impressed

He was merely offering constructive criticism during last years matches,it appears to have been accepted well and taken on board.

Wedgie wrote:Clayton, found guilty but received a reprimand because of good record.
Wiggins, not guilty but someone who works with the Weed said the news is it was still Wiggo's last game for Westies last week.

Apparently because he was found guilty this makes him ineligible for the Magarey.

spell_check wrote:

Wedgie wrote:Clayton, found guilty but received a reprimand because of good record.
Wiggins, not guilty but someone who works with the Weed said the news is it was still Wiggo's last game for Westies last week.

Apparently because he was found guilty this makes him ineligible for the Magarey.

correct

Wiggins gets off for Headbutting?Clayton gets a reprimand because of his good record???Well Im pretty sure J.Westhoff has a good clean record and he gets 2 weeks,what a JOKE.

Scottdog wrote:Wiggins gets off for Headbutting?Clayton gets a reprimand because of his good record???Well Im pretty sure J.Westhoff has a good clean record and he gets 2 weeks,what a JOKE.

Not to mention Sporn getting a week for someone running into him.

Has Sporn ever been reported before,AFL or SANFL.Westys was clumsy on Wintle but with his thin physique its lucky that he didnt break his leg by making contact with Wintles head.I still cant believe it he basically misses a month of footy and a possible AFL call up and the ANZAC day match.Gee I hope that the twins behave themselves this season.

Its all part of a conspiracy to get Centrals out of the GF. Apparently stocks of blue paint are getting down and West End want some different colours this year.

Well i saw the incident ( claytons ) and didn't think much at the time , other than it being a cheap shot