Page 1 of 2
Advertiser SANFL Blog
Posted:
Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:16 pmby Ecky
Have a read of this for a laugh...
http://blogs.news.com.au/adelaidenow/yo ... s_80s_90s/
The "Executive Sports Editor" of the Advertiser showed up his lack of SANFL knowledge, and then insulted me by assuming I was a Port supporter, and showed that he cannot spell!
Re: Advertiser SANFL Blog
Posted:
Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:20 pmby rod_rooster
Ecky wrote:Have a read of this for a laugh...
http://blogs.news.com.au/adelaidenow/yo ... s_80s_90s/The "Executive Sports Editor" of the Advertiser showed up his lack of SANFL knowledge, and then insulted me by assuming I was a Port supporter, and showed that he cannot spell!
Lol. Had his mind swithched to VFL/AFL indeed
Posted:
Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:56 pmby Dogwatcher
oh dear.
And also oh dear to his photo....
Posted:
Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:09 pmby am Bays
LOL He probably thought Ecky stood for Ivan Eckermann.....
Posted:
Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:09 pmby Pseudo
Glad to see that Port didn't win 1992 after all.
Posted:
Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:41 pmby -
Ecky,
I posted for you.
Awaiting moderation
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:59 amby Ecky
Poor Pete is just digging a bigger hole for himself now.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:20 amby Wedgie
Am I ignorant but Ive never heard of Peter Dawe?
Knowing the Advertiser he's probably from New Zealand.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:23 amby Ecky
I've never heard of him either, and I read the Advertiser each day.
Someone should ask him another question to test out how much he really knows about the SANFL...
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:22 amby zipzap
Ecky wrote:I've never heard of him either, and I read the Advertiser each day.
Maybe he's a made-up person, like Bill King.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:14 amby Dogwatcher
Bill King's not real!!!!
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:15 amby -
I dont reckon many people refer to them as the "pies" either.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:27 amby Brucetiki
Don't take this guy's column too seriously. There's some disclosure issues here I reckon. Look at last weeks rant, when he raved on about how the Showdowns have lost their pizazz since West End stopped sponsoring, the page was full of West End advertising, yet not one reference about any potential sponsorship West End have of this column.
If West End is sponsoring the column, then it should have been disclosed - especially for the Showdown article.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:46 amby smac
Perfect opportunity to get someone at the Advertiser discussing SANFL and you blokes go on the front foot and smack his words back at him?
Just talk about days at your favourite oval, watching your favourite team and then tell him it was only last weekend.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:33 pmby Leaping Lindner
- wrote:I dont reckon many people refer to them as the "pies" either.
Port are the "maggies" - Collingwood are the "'pies". Well at least from my generation back.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:19 pmby Barto
Leaping Lindner wrote:- wrote:I dont reckon many people refer to them as the "pies" either.
Port are the "maggies" - Collingwood are the "'pies". Well at least from my generation back.
Remember that he's switched to VFL mode.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:24 pmby Barto
Hmmm.
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:35 pmby TroyGFC
Shoulds like you are a Magpies supporter _ sorry had my mind switched to VFL/AFL
Peter Dawe
A great newspaper editor!!
Posted:
Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:14 pmby Rik E Boy
Barto wrote: Hmmm.
LOL. Nice work. Here endeth the thread.
regards,
REB
Posted:
Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:29 pmby Ecky
I see the "best" responses to this blog got published in today's Advertiser. Not surprising that some of our more "critical" comments didn't make the cut.
