by am Bays » Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:59 pm
by Coorong » Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:04 pm
by am Bays » Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:13 pm
Coorong wrote:summer/swallow/make/one
Bit early there Tassie. Remember how subdued I was after last week.
by Rik E Boy » Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:30 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Coorong wrote:summer/swallow/make/one
Bit early there Tassie. Remember how subdued I was after last week.
I 100% agree Coorong, just taking an opportunity....
Still a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGG way to go for us......
by rod_rooster » Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:05 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Having done what Sturt did last week (which launched a plethora of threads, posts and bleatings by some, defiantely not all, Sturt supporters) I think it is a plausible question to ask....have Glenelg launched a new renaissance given that their win (in percentage terms) was biggers than Sturts
Sturt1 given a Bays supporter (BAyman) started the thread " Are Sturt the real deal?" I'd be a obliged if you would start a similar one on Glenelg....
Dutchy if you start a thread "Well done Glenelg and Mark Mickan" it too would be appreciated...
To all you Glenelg posters feel free to hijack all other threads and wax lyrical about Glenelg beating Port.....
I can remember laughing at several learned people both on here for confidently predicting Glenelg would finish with the Wooden Spoon in 2007.
Sturt1, Punky etc.
Where are you now?
Mark Mickan has given our Club a new vitality, sense of positivity and a direction.
The Bays may take 1 or 2 years to win the Holy Grail but gee it's been an exciting few hours at Brighton Rd
by therisingblues » Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:20 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Having done what Sturt did last week (which launched a plethora of threads, posts and bleatings by some, defiantely not all, Sturt supporters) I think it is a plausible question to ask....have Glenelg launched a new renaissance given that their win (in percentage terms) was biggers than Sturts
The Bays may take 1 or 2 years to win the Holy Grail but gee it's been an exciting few hours at Brighton Rd
by Stevie_K » Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:56 pm
by smithy » Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:58 pm
by spell_check » Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:04 pm
Stevie_K wrote:And most clearly Port are our bitches now (you know, just like we are apparently West's bitches?)
by Wedgie » Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:22 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:40 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:46 pm
Dutchy wrote:I thought we had made the finals at some stage of our history![]()
maybe 85/86 was a dream....bloody good one though!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Stevie_K » Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:11 am
spell_check wrote:Stevie_K wrote:And most clearly Port are our bitches now (you know, just like we are apparently West's bitches?)
You have to win three in a row to do that. It was the first time since 1987/88 since Glenelg have won two in a row over Port, thus ending the current longest bitch partnership in the SANFL.
by Dutchy » Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:15 am
Wedgie wrote:If Glenelg's supporters weren't such dickheads I'd dead set have a soft spot for them being so unsuccessful over such a long period of time.
Hopefully they come 6th this year and continue to be the last club to not have made finals in the SANFL with the fantastic humility of their fans.
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:18 am
Dutchy wrote:Wedgie wrote:If Glenelg's supporters weren't such dickheads I'd dead set have a soft spot for them being so unsuccessful over such a long period of time.
Hopefully they come 6th this year and continue to be the last club to not have made finals in the SANFL with the fantastic humility of their fans.
you said we havent made the finals...
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by spell_check » Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:22 am
Stevie_K wrote:spell_check wrote:Stevie_K wrote:And most clearly Port are our bitches now (you know, just like we are apparently West's bitches?)
You have to win three in a row to do that. It was the first time since 1987/88 since Glenelg have won two in a row over Port, thus ending the current longest bitch partnership in the SANFL.
My post was a joke.
When West beat us last week, someone called us their "bitches", Which was odd because in the last clash between the two (06), We embarassed them and had a day out at the bay.
Seeing as we have 2 in a row, i thought the same applied
by Dutchy » Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:23 am
by spell_check » Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:23 am
spell_check wrote:Stevie_K wrote:spell_check wrote:Stevie_K wrote:And most clearly Port are our bitches now (you know, just like we are apparently West's bitches?)
You have to win three in a row to do that. It was the first time since 1987/88 since Glenelg have won two in a row over Port, thus ending the current longest bitch partnership in the SANFL.
My post was a joke.
When West beat us last week, someone called us their "bitches", Which was odd because in the last clash between the two (06), We embarassed them and had a day out at the bay.
Seeing as we have 2 in a row, i thought the same applied
You might have missed a thread in here somewhere to do with a ruling on bitches in the SANFL and how to determine them. It was first established on FootySA that three wins in a row would create a bitch partnership and two to break it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |