Page 1 of 2
CUPIDO + WATERHOUSE

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 7:12 pm
by mal
Ive heard a lot of unfavourable comments about these 2 footballers on SAFOOTY
Today in the PA + WA game they kicked about 15 goals between them
I think WATERHOUSE 8 CUPIDO 7 GOALS
Both are sensational footballers and as a nuetral supporter it was an immeasurable
pleasure to watch these 2 brilliant footballers in action.
Yes CUPIDO was ridiculed and heckled most of the day
WATERHOUSE was criticised once as well
Time to get off their backs and just enjoy the marvellous skills they regularly show us.

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 7:16 pm
by Wedgie
Ive always been a fan of Waterhouse, I think he's in for a stellar year and its no coincidence that his best 2 weeks are the 2 weeks Hargraves has played.
Clive had to play 2 roles in the past and always got the best defender and was quite often double teamed.
That wont happen with Hargs in the goal square and the 2 are good mates too so should have a good understanding.
Cupido oozes class, there's never been any doubting that but I'll reserve judgement on his season till the end of the year, so far so good.

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 7:20 pm
by zipzap
Wedgie wrote:Cupido oozes class
Oozing class is good. Gravy is the problem.

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 9:33 pm
by redandblack
Good post, mal, they were both brilliant today.
Looking at Cupido, I think the fat jokes are no longer relevant.

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 9:43 pm
by PortAdelaideProud
redandblack wrote:Good post, mal, they were both brilliant today.
Looking at Cupido, I think the fat jokes are no longer relevant.
He's not as fat as last year, but he still looks like he ate all the pies.

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 9:50 pm
by am Bays
PortAdelaideProud wrote:redandblack wrote:Good post, mal, they were both brilliant today.
Looking at Cupido, I think the fat jokes are no longer relevant.
He's not as fat as last year, but he still looks like he ate all the pies.
He's still too fat for SANFL League footy standard (mind you if he was "fit" enouygh for SANFL legue footy he wouldn't be here with his skills...
Mind you to be consistant (i.e. bagging other teams players for tehir lack of fitness) to the trained eye SLSP isn't as fit as he could be either....

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 9:55 pm
by BPBRB
redandblack wrote:Good post, mal, they were both brilliant today.
Looking at Cupido, I think the fat jokes are no longer relevant.
The South fans were saying the same thing this time last year

. Wait until the cold weather sets in and he has to comfort himself with a hearty winter diet of fat food. Dough boy will be back!

Posted:
Sun May 13, 2007 11:17 pm
by Blacky
BPBRB wrote:redandblack wrote:Good post, mal, they were both brilliant today.
Looking at Cupido, I think the fat jokes are no longer relevant.
The South fans were saying the same thing this time last year

. Wait until the cold weather sets in and he has to comfort himself with a hearty winter diet of fat food. Dough boy will be back!
some how i don't think so
Re: CUPIDO + WATERHOUSE

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 10:31 am
by rod_rooster
mal wrote:
Time to get off their backs and just enjoy the marvellous skills they regularly show us.
See that is the problem mal. They don't do it regularly. I hope they don't start either.

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 2:51 pm
by leftlegger
The pic of clive's grab in the paper is a beauty

Re: CUPIDO + WATERHOUSE

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 3:11 pm
by mal
rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:
Time to get off their backs and just enjoy the marvellous skills they regularly show us.
See that is the problem mal. They don't do it regularly. I hope they don't start either.
Regular enough for me
And more regular than most full forwards in the comp [except BC at ST]

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 3:58 pm
by Lovin Life
Cupido was very damaging on sunday as was waterhouse.
I think Cupido was better becuase he played on two quality backmen in Ah Chee and Lokan. Ah Chee looked lost and had to go to the half back line to find the ball. Lokan was simply outclassed by great body work and precise kicking.
take nothing away from Waterhouse he was spectacular to watch but only played on Jacques and Mensforth.

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 4:52 pm
by mal
Lovin Life wrote:Cupido was very damaging on sunday as was waterhouse.
I think Cupido was better becuase he played on two quality backmen in Ah Chee and Lokan. Ah Chee looked lost and had to go to the half back line to find the ball. Lokan was simply outclassed by great body work and precise kicking.
take nothing away from Waterhouse he was spectacular to watch but only played on Jacques and Mensforth.
You must have stood near me at Alberton thats virtually what I said to my mates

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 6:30 pm
by Booney
I think Clive is one of,if not the best one grab player in a marking contest in the SANFL.His vice like hands grab that pill and snaffle it quick smart.
Re: CUPIDO + WATERHOUSE

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 7:09 pm
by Dog_ger
mal wrote:Ive heard a lot of unfavourable comments about these 2 footballers on SAFOOTY
Today in the PA + WA game they kicked about 15 goals between them
I think WATERHOUSE 8 CUPIDO 7 GOALS
Both are sensational footballers and as a nuetral supporter it was an immeasurable
pleasure to watch these 2 brilliant footballers in action.
Yes CUPIDO was ridiculed and heckled most of the day
WATERHOUSE was criticised once as well
Time to get off their backs and just enjoy the marvellous skills they regularly show us.
Good post mal....!

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 7:30 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
WHY ISNT BIG WILLO in this topic??????

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 7:40 pm
by Coorong
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:WHY ISNT BIG WILLO in this topic??????
Because the topic is about FF's Duh! He is
our CHF

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 7:42 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
Coorong wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:WHY ISNT BIG WILLO in this topic??????
Because the topic is about FF's Duh! He is
our CHF
stop playing him out of position............

Posted:
Mon May 14, 2007 8:10 pm
by mal
WILLO gave a couple of passes to Cupido which were a touch of class
With these 2 WA will be a good team and win some games

Posted:
Tue May 15, 2007 9:35 am
by doggies4eva
Lovin Life wrote:Cupido was very damaging on sunday as was waterhouse.
I think Cupido was better becuase he played on two quality backmen in Ah Chee and Lokan. Ah Chee looked lost and had to go to the half back line to find the ball. Lokan was simply outclassed by great body work and precise kicking.
take nothing away from Waterhouse he was spectacular to watch but only played on Jacques and Mensforth.
It will be interesting to see how he goes this week when he ha a quality opponent.