by bayman » Sun May 20, 2007 1:51 am
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Sun May 20, 2007 6:12 am
by Punk Rooster » Sun May 20, 2007 6:56 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Dutchy » Sun May 20, 2007 8:08 am
bayman wrote:i sat in the family area with little bayman & one of his school mates & mal, & i saw NO TROUBLE OR INCIDENTS tonight so i think while we are all quick to 'have a go' at disgraceful incidents & tonight it should be made aware that there was no trouble at all from where we were sitting & the crowd should be praised for doing the 'right thing'
well done to the crowd at elizabeth
by Dogwatcher » Sun May 20, 2007 9:15 am
by Ian » Sun May 20, 2007 10:47 am
by Wedgie » Sun May 20, 2007 10:50 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Sun May 20, 2007 10:57 am
Wedgie wrote:I don't think there's ever been an incident at Elizabeth Oval when the Dogs have won that Ive heard of and its good to hear it continuing, well done all.
by Wedgie » Sun May 20, 2007 11:00 am
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:I don't think there's ever been an incident at Elizabeth Oval when the Dogs have won that Ive heard of and its good to hear it continuing, well done all.
If the result had gone the other way Wedgie,you think other wise?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by CK » Sun May 20, 2007 11:25 am
by StrayDog » Sun May 20, 2007 3:39 pm
bayman wrote:i sat in the family area with little bayman & one of his school mates & mal, ...... well done to the crowd at elizabeth
by redwhiteandblueblooded » Sun May 20, 2007 3:43 pm
by StrayDog » Sun May 20, 2007 3:48 pm
redwhiteandblueblooded wrote:the lack of trouble must be why I had not heard any mention of the score on either ABC or 5AA news early this morning. Pity it seems only sensation (ie crowd misbehavior) makes the SANFL news-worthy.
by scott » Sun May 20, 2007 5:18 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Bayman- Port v Centrals, the violence was always going to cancel itself out really. Just like strapping buttered toast to a cats back- neither would hit the ground!
by Jar Man Out » Sun May 20, 2007 6:39 pm
scott wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Bayman- Port v Centrals, the violence was always going to cancel itself out really. Just like strapping buttered toast to a cats back- neither would hit the ground!
by giffo » Mon May 21, 2007 10:22 pm
Or when Wedgie wasn't there armed with his camera to gather evidenceWedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:I don't think there's ever been an incident at Elizabeth Oval when the Dogs have won that Ive heard of and its good to hear it continuing, well done all.
If the result had gone the other way Wedgie,you think other wise?
No idea mate, that would be purely hypothetical.
Also I should add on my original post I meant to type "I don't think there's ever been an incident at Elizabeth Oval on a Saturday night when the Dogs have won".
by topsywaldron » Mon May 21, 2007 10:58 pm
by giffo » Mon May 21, 2007 11:00 pm
Wait till next week when we can complain about the toilets at Prospect behind the Groggies bartopsywaldron wrote:No crowd trouble at Elizabeth? What are Centrals fans going to moan about this week then?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |