Anzac Day football

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Anzac Day football

Postby - » Wed May 23, 2007 10:04 pm

In the paper today the maggies ceo said he wanted Port Norwood back. He said its the best way to maximise crowds. He is correct. I don't think its fair though. My idea is to have a double header of last years grand finalists amd Port Norwood. If Port or Norwood make the gf the year before throw another team in. I think 5000 people is a waste of the opportunity of Anzac Day and somthing could be tried without getting rid of the tradition of the previous years grand finalists. With my modelI think 10000 is very realistic.
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby spell_check » Wed May 23, 2007 10:08 pm

I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby - » Wed May 23, 2007 10:09 pm

Anzac Day double headers worked in the 80's
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby - » Wed May 23, 2007 10:10 pm

spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Anzac Day football

Postby Jar Man Out » Wed May 23, 2007 10:13 pm

- wrote:In the paper today the maggies ceo said he wanted Port Norwood back. He said its the best way to maximise crowds. He is correct. I don't think its fair though. My idea is to have a double header of last years grand finalists amd Port Norwood. If Port or Norwood make the gf the year before throw another team in. I think 5000 people is a waste of the opportunity of Anzac Day and somthing could be tried without getting rid of the tradition of the previous years grand finalists. With my modelI think 10000 is very realistic.


already have season opener.

if you arent good enough to make anzac day. my heart bleeds for ya.
User avatar
Jar Man Out
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:27 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Anzac Day football

Postby Pseudo » Wed May 23, 2007 10:45 pm

- wrote:In the paper today the maggies ceo said he wanted Port Norwood back.


Fine by me, so long as Port and Norwood both make the previous year's Grand Final.

If not, well tough bickies.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12246
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1655 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Postby Brucetiki » Thu May 24, 2007 12:12 am

No way, has to be last years Grand Finalist. We don't need another Essendon v Collingwood, where the game is blown way out of proportion.
They don't keep me here because I'm gorgeous and 5'10
Brucetiki
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4629
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:23 pm
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 40 times

Postby spell_check » Thu May 24, 2007 12:23 am

- wrote:
spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:


That was the first team off the top of my head...

If it makes you feel better I thought of Sturt, then North, then Central. But Central is likely to be in the GF anyway. :wink:

But I agree with md, Pseudo and Bruce as well.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby Aerie » Thu May 24, 2007 12:25 am

If Port or Norwood could guarantee at least a crowd of 15,000+ every year, then I'm not fussed if they have rights to ANZAC Day. If not, and I doubt they'd get more than 10,000, then it really isn't worth changing our tradition of rewarding the previous year's grand finalists.

I don't mind the idea of a double header game as I think all the hype that surrounds the Essendon vs Collingwood game has greatly effected our day with many people staying home to watch the AFL on tv. A second game starting at 6:30 could attract a decent crowd.

12pm - Previous GF Reserves
3pm - GF Rematch
6:30pm - Port vs Norwood (should either of these teams defy 21st century history and actually make a GF, don't have the double header)

Of course, the SANFL and its clubs will never get a huge crowd unless they really promote ANZAC Day. The promotion of the game this year was nearly non-existent.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Postby spell_check » Thu May 24, 2007 12:27 am

Aerie wrote:If Port or Norwood could guarantee at least a crowd of 15,000+ every year, then I'm not fussed if they have rights to ANZAC Day. If not, and I doubt they'd get more than 10,000, then it really isn't worth changing our tradition of rewarding the previous year's grand finalists.

I don't mind the idea of a double header game as I think all the hype that surrounds the Essendon vs Collingwood game has greatly effected our day with many people staying home to watch the AFL on tv. A second game starting at 6:30 could attract a decent crowd.

12pm - Previous GF Reserves
3pm - GF Rematch
6:30pm - Port vs Norwood (should either of these teams defy 21st century history and actually make a GF, don't have the double header)

Of course, the SANFL and its clubs will never get a huge crowd unless they really promote ANZAC Day. The promotion of the game this year was nearly non-existent.


In fact I agree with this post even more! :P :lol: :wink:

Especially the last line. :)
Last edited by spell_check on Thu May 24, 2007 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Postby eddie eagle » Thu May 24, 2007 12:27 am

Pathetic suggestion by the clueless richardson, he should try get his struggling club to actually make a grand final and earn the right.

Perhaps etheton should play a double header at adelaide oval. Join with port power at their potential new ground ....this will help port power actually pull a crowd, and just maybe half fill the oval.
eddie eagle
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:58 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Jimmy » Thu May 24, 2007 12:40 am

spell_check wrote:
- wrote:
spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:


That was the first team off the top of my head...

If it makes you feel better I thought of Sturt, then North, then Central. But Central is likely to be in the GF anyway. :wink:

But I agree with md, Pseudo and Bruce as well.


dont worry spelly, he will be like that till he's 90 :lol:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby Jimmy » Thu May 24, 2007 12:41 am

fwiw, last years' gf finalists....keep it as it is.

port, why dont you piss off to another...oh...oops :oops:
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby doggies4eva » Thu May 24, 2007 1:04 am

What about a compromise - if neither Port nor Norwood played in the previous GF then they can be the curtain raiser to the GF rematch. A double header should draw a big crowd.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby smithy » Thu May 24, 2007 1:19 am

- wrote:
spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:


Maybe because they DO have the 2nd biggest supporter base in the state.
smithy
 

Postby McAlmanac » Thu May 24, 2007 1:37 am

smithy wrote:
- wrote:
spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:


Maybe because they DO have the 2nd biggest supporter base in the state.

You are a reliable poster - is there reliable evidence of that assertion?
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby Jimmy » Thu May 24, 2007 1:42 am

McAlmanac wrote:
smithy wrote:
- wrote:
spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:


Maybe because they DO have the 2nd biggest supporter base in the state.

You are a reliable poster - is there reliable evidence of that assertion?


common knowledge ;)
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Postby smithy » Thu May 24, 2007 1:56 am

McAlmanac wrote:
smithy wrote:
- wrote:
spell_check wrote:I was thinking that myself. Two games on ANZAC Day would mean that both matches should get more than what they normally do.

If one of Port and Norwood get into the Grand Final, what would happen then? Do they go for Port/Norwood still or have the Grand Finallists play off and the other team play say Sturt or whoever?


Classic how Sturt always get mentioned next :roll:


Maybe because they DO have the 2nd biggest supporter base in the state.

You are a reliable poster - is there reliable evidence of that assertion?


Sure McAL..

highest attendance at adelaide oval - sturt vs port
highest attendance at footy park sturt vs port
highest attendance for minor round sturt vs glenelg (fathers day match at footy park 76 or 77)
highest attendance for dbl header - sturt v port & north v centrals 1988, round 19 ? 38000 people saw the best minor round game ever. Wedgie even stated that the crowd emptied to about 7000 after the 1st game had finished to quote a neutral point of view.
smithy
 

Postby McAlmanac » Thu May 24, 2007 2:07 am

With due respect, all those quotes are from over 20 years ago. How is Sturt's supporter base today? Over and above other teams?
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby Jimmy » Thu May 24, 2007 2:26 am

McAlmanac wrote:With due respect, all those quotes are from over 20 years ago. How is Sturt's supporter base today? Over and above other teams?


still have the same supporters as 20 years ago, they are just a little older now :)
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |