by Mickyj » Thu May 24, 2007 6:44 pm
by Aerie » Thu May 24, 2007 6:53 pm
by MightyEagles » Thu May 24, 2007 9:26 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Fri May 25, 2007 1:42 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri May 25, 2007 2:19 pm
by MightyEagles » Fri May 25, 2007 4:02 pm
by MightyEagles » Fri May 25, 2007 4:04 pm
by HeartBeatsTrue » Fri May 25, 2007 4:13 pm
MightyEagles wrote:South on ave give away 28 frees a game (No. 1 in League)
Eagles on ave give away 19 frees a game (No. 9 in League)
by Aerie » Fri May 25, 2007 4:15 pm
by MightyEagles » Fri May 25, 2007 4:20 pm
Aerie wrote:Would there be a younger league backline in the history of league footy than the one the Eagles named? Especially the full back line.
HB: Redden (22) Hier (18 ) Fiacchi (26)
FB: Stewart (19) Salter (19) Fairclough (17)
by westcoastpanther » Fri May 25, 2007 4:31 pm
by Mickyj » Fri May 25, 2007 4:38 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Although I'm not game enough to put my hard earned on it, I think South are a big chance here. Carlisle has shut Passador down before which if repeated, will put pressure on the remaining forwards. With no Cicca or Inkster still, if we get it going, IF, we are a chance for 40+.
by Aerie » Fri May 25, 2007 4:56 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Although I'm not game enough to put my hard earned on it, I think South are a big chance here. Carlisle has shut Passador down before which if repeated, will put pressure on the remaining forwards. With no Cicca or Inkster still, if we get it going, IF, we are a chance for 40+.
by Mickyj » Fri May 25, 2007 5:22 pm
Aerie wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Although I'm not game enough to put my hard earned on it, I think South are a big chance here. Carlisle has shut Passador down before which if repeated, will put pressure on the remaining forwards. With no Cicca or Inkster still, if we get it going, IF, we are a chance for 40+.
South are definitely a chance. I tipped them top 3 at the start of the year and thought they were the most dangerous side in last years finals series and glad we didn't have to play them. Like the Eagles, they have underperformed so far this year.
If Passador is quiet early I'd be quick to swap him and McGregor around. I'd be tempted to start McGregor close to the goal square anyway as I think he is most effective as a forward line player within 30m of goal. We have Grocke who can do the running around and contesting around the 50 and further up the ground.
by Ian » Fri May 25, 2007 11:01 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat May 26, 2007 7:04 am
Aerie wrote:Would there be a younger league backline in the history of league footy than the one the Eagles named? Especially the full back line.
HB: Redden (22) Hier (18 ) Fiacchi (26)
FB: Stewart (19) Salter (19) Fairclough (17)
by Jimmy » Sat May 26, 2007 7:37 am
johntheclaret wrote:Aerie wrote:Would there be a younger league backline in the history of league footy than the one the Eagles named? Especially the full back line.
HB: Redden (22) Hier (18 ) Fiacchi (26)
FB: Stewart (19) Salter (19) Fairclough (17)
Without checking, the current Roosters back line must be pretty close (cumulative) as long as Benny H isn't playing.
Other wise the Eagles bacline is collectively younger than BH on his own.
by Sojourner » Sun May 27, 2007 1:02 am
by Mickyj » Sun May 27, 2007 9:01 am
Sojourner wrote:South copped a flogging from the Eagles in round one, there has been a lot of conjecture since over recent weeks as to how the club has improved, our record is not great at Woodville so there is a lot riding on tommorows game. If South did win tommorow I would rate them as a high chance of participating again in the finals this year, if the result is a loss it would confirm my suspicion that the club this year is not as good as the team we had last year, I also feel that is the same of several SANFL clubs, yet still sides do take some time to gel together, so it could all change towards the end of the season!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |