by eaglehaslanded » Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:47 pm
by smac » Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:58 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:11 am
smac wrote:I think the ladder is redundant until all teams have played the same number of games. Use the 'L' column to judge the order better. Dogs top, Norf second, the rest can kick sh!t out of each other for the next couple of months.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by smac » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:13 am
Wedgie wrote:smac wrote:I think the ladder is redundant until all teams have played the same number of games. Use the 'L' column to judge the order better. Dogs top, Norf second, the rest can kick sh!t out of each other for the next couple of months.
Agreed, but it is a good talking point and looks funny when the team with the 2nd best percentage isn't in the 5, even if it is only for 18 hours.
by RoosterMarty » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:18 am
by SimonH » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:41 am
It looked even funnier that near the end of the last round, a team with a 50/50 win:loss record (Port) was second. (And it would still be the case if only the Eags had lost, or won by a bit less.) That can't happen too often.Wedgie wrote:Agreed, but it is a good talking point and looks funny when the team with the 2nd best percentage isn't in the 5, even if it is only for 18 hours.
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:42 am
SimonH wrote:It looked even funnier that near the end of the last round, a team with a 50/50 win:loss record (Port) was second. (And it would still be the case if only the Eags had lost, or won by a bit less.) That can't happen too often.Wedgie wrote:Agreed, but it is a good talking point and looks funny when the team with the 2nd best percentage isn't in the 5, even if it is only for 18 hours.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:55 pm
smac wrote:Wedgie wrote:smac wrote:I think the ladder is redundant until all teams have played the same number of games. Use the 'L' column to judge the order better. Dogs top, Norf second, the rest can kick sh!t out of each other for the next couple of months.
Agreed, but it is a good talking point and looks funny when the team with the 2nd best percentage isn't in the 5, even if it is only for 18 hours.
Highly confident mate. Probably should be with the recent record at Alberton!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by am Bays » Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:58 pm
smac wrote:I think the ladder is redundant until all teams have played the same number of games. Use the 'L' column to judge the order better. Dogs top, Norf second, the rest can kick sh!t out of each other for the next couple of months.
by therisingblues » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:01 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Jars has never lost at Alberton and I think the margin has increased each time, I doubt that will continue tomorrow because of the weather but I still think we can win the game.
by Wedgie » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:02 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Hondo » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:06 pm
Wedgie wrote:Is it just a matter of Centrals, North and the Eagles with the rest being a waste of space like last year?
by therisingblues » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:08 pm
by smac » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:30 pm
I don't lok down that far, would get the bends on the way back up.1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:smac wrote:I think the ladder is redundant until all teams have played the same number of games. Use the 'L' column to judge the order better. Dogs top, Norf second, the rest can kick sh!t out of each other for the next couple of months.
I don't think it is redundant when you look at the line # nine....speaks volumes...
by spell_check » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:44 pm
smac wrote:I don't lok down that far, would get the bends on the way back up.1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:smac wrote:I think the ladder is redundant until all teams have played the same number of games. Use the 'L' column to judge the order better. Dogs top, Norf second, the rest can kick sh!t out of each other for the next couple of months.
I don't think it is redundant when you look at the line # nine....speaks volumes...
by spell_check » Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:28 pm
by spell_check » Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:29 pm
spell_check wrote:It's not exactly what you said, but about the same:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7966&p=172802&hilit=#p172802
by Aerie » Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:33 pm
therisingblues wrote:TEAM PL W L D FOR AST PERC PTS
CD......8 8 0 0 804 491 62.08% 16
NA ....7 4 2 1 529 473 52.79% 9
EAG....7 4 3 0 723 663 52.16% 8
PA .....9 4 5 0 771 718 51.78% 8
NWD...8 4 4 0 760 774 49.54% 8
ST ....7 4 3 0 588 648 47.57% 8
SA.....7 2 4 1 567 745 43.22% 5
WA ...8 2 6 0 625 733 46.02% 4
GL ....7 1 6 0 521 643 44.76% 2
And this is what the table looks like tonight. (minus th ecorrect percentage for West, Port, North and Centrals)
Sturt slip out of the five for the first time this year.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |