SA Footy

0.1 is an under 10s score. Anyone happen to see this match and can comment on what happened?

Surely the lowest reserves score ever seen?

Macca19 wrote:0.1 is an under 10s score. Anyone happen to see this match and can comment on what happened?

Surely the lowest reserves score ever seen?

enter "THE GURU" himself....cue spelly .... another clenched fist and "YES" moment

Macca19 wrote:0.1 is an under 10s score. Anyone happen to see this match and can comment on what happened?

Surely the lowest reserves score ever seen?

Agree

I would be interested to hear any comments from someone who witnessed the game.

according to reports yesterday Elizabeth was a disgrace. What do expect when it had been raining all week

Centrals 10.11.71
West 0.1.1

first time ever a team has won by 70 points but only kicked 10 goals?

Thiele wrote:according to reports yesterday Elizabeth was a disgrace. What do expect when it had been raining all week

Heard from reports West were the disgrace

we were a disgrace

Thiele wrote:according to reports yesterday Elizabeth was a disgrace. What do expect when it had been raining all week

I thought it was everyone's beloved "Doug" that used to have the sprinklers turned on at Richmond prior to weekend matches in winter...

What the f#@^. I couldn't believe my eyes this morning when I opened up the paper to read that score line. Just goes to show Westies obviously don't have too much depth there. For christ sake 1 point in 4 quarters of footy at reserves level is even beyond embarrasing.

We couldn't belive it when we herd on saturday morning

Thiele wrote:according to reports yesterday Elizabeth was a disgrace. What do expect when it had been raining all week

Thiele u are a 100% red and black supporter, but to even mention the confition of elizabeth is a cop out on your part

as a westies supporter i am ashamed at that effort and it coujd not be that bad as centraks still could manage 10 goals and have [u]21[/u] shots to our 1

Thiele wrote:according to reports yesterday Elizabeth was a disgrace. What do expect when it had been raining all week

I have been disappointed with the condition of the oval this season, it has been below par.

dash61 wrote:

Thiele wrote:according to reports yesterday Elizabeth was a disgrace. What do expect when it had been raining all week

Thiele u are a 100% red and black supporter, but to even mention the confition of elizabeth is a cop out on your part

as a westies supporter i am ashamed at that effort and it coujd not be that bad as centraks still could manage 10 goals and have [u]21[/u] shots to our 1

fistly when i herd we only kicked a point for the game i thought it was a joke. But when i herd it was the real score i was ashamed. BTW i was at Berri on friday night so i missed my first reserves game in a while.

Speaking to a mate who played in the game, he said it was the worst conditions he's ever played in, apparently Elizabeth Oval is an absolute disgrace at the moment.

The point was rushed too...

might have to speak to the reserves runner for West to see what happended

Macca19 wrote:0.1 is an under 10s score. Anyone happen to see this match and can comment on what happened?

Surely the lowest reserves score ever seen?

Well there is a lower score possible you know. My question is, was the bloods point "rushed" by the doggies

I've only got scores in the other grades from 1998 and the previous lowest in that time was 1.2 (8) also by West in Rd 23 2005.

No one in any grade has been scoreless - Sturts Under 17s kicked 0.1 (1) as well in 2001.

I believe it was a genuine point

Kicked by Cail Harris. They should have put 'pointkicker' in the paper, instead of goalkickers.

They lost their previous 3 games by only a few points, I think.

redandblack wrote:I believe it was a genuine point

Kicked by Cail Harris. They should have put 'pointkicker' in the paper, instead of goalkickers.

They lost their previous 3 games by only a few points, I think.

You are correct

Sturt 1 point (lost)
Norwood 11 points (lost)
Port 2 points(lost)