SA Footy

well most of us think central are about a 5 goal better side than the rest, so if a full strength central team played the state team (less the dogs players) who would win ?

1, at adelaide oval ?
2, at elizabeth oval ?

If 1 club can beat them then a 'best-of' the other 8 clubs would too ... wherever it was played

Assuming the 'best of' side has time to train together, etc

At full strength, in good form and fully focussed I'd back the dogs (although I would, wouldn't I). However, as soon as we lost a key player, or a couple of our first choice 21 at all, had too many guys down on form or just had a bad day we wouldn't have a hope. The depth of a state side would be too much.

Would we get Westy and Symesy?

Grahaml wrote:At full strength, in good form and fully focussed I'd back the dogs (although I would, wouldn't I). However, as soon as we lost a key player, or a couple of our first choice 21 at all, had too many guys down on form or just had a bad day we wouldn't have a hope. The depth of a state side would be too much.

Would we get Westy and Symesy?

FFS Grahaml We've just lost to Sturt. Its back to basics and get a win on the board.

This is hilarious.

Irony lost on you a bit, buddy?

PS, not sure if you've noticed but I'm not playing. I don't need to get back to basics at all. In fact, I think I'm in pretty good form with my stirring right now.

At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

yep thats carnage

Was unaware any game had been played. Who were the leading goalkickers?

How about Sturt v Central combined, who'd win?

mal wrote:At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

nelson before sheedy id say mate, nels is in career best form

Centrals by 10 goals.

Cupido? Not on what I saw on Saturday.

And who would the coach be? Make it Jars and we may have a chance

I think a better game to hold would be northern sides versus southern sides. For the North, we could have Port, Central, North and the Eagles. The south would therefore consist of Norwood, Sturt, South, West and Glenelg.

doggies4eva wrote:Cupido? Not on what I saw on Saturday.

And who would the coach be? Make it Jars and we may have a chance

Coach Wayne WEED
To prove to himself that Centrals are beatable

mal wrote:At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

who said no afl players can play i stated in my ? that at full strength which includes their afl adelaide/port based players, my ? mal my rules not yours old son

bayman wrote:

mal wrote:At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

who said no afl players can play i stated in my ? that at full strength which includes their afl adelaide/port based players, my ? mal my rules not yours old son

OK BAYMAN rules
include AFL listed players as well and increase the winning margin for the rest
by an extra 5 goals

bayman wrote:

mal wrote:At Adelaide Oval on a dry day
REST 30-18
CENTRALS 7-10

At Lizzy Oval on a dry day
REST 22-12
CENTRALS 7-10

REST TEAM [no AFL players can play]

ALLEN...............CHAMBERS....................VLATKO
LADHAMS..........ALLEWAY.......................CUPIDO
SUMMERTON......MOTLOP........................BACKWELL
HOLLANDS.........MCKENZIE.....................MCGUINESS
CICOLEELA.........AHCHEE........................HOWARD

LINDSAY
SHEEDY
KENNA

INTERCHANGE
PARRY
BORLACE
CRANE

That team would beat Centrals.
Only Wayne Weed would disagree

who said no afl players can play i stated in my ? that at full strength which includes their afl adelaide/port based players, my ? mal my rules not yours old son

So if it included the AFL listed players wouldn't the combined side be a combined side of the Crows and Port minus those aligned to Central? All players from Port and the Crows are aligned to an SANFL club.

Grahaml wrote:Irony lost on you a bit, buddy?

PS, not sure if you've noticed but I'm not playing. I don't need to get back to basics at all. In fact, I think I'm in pretty good form with my stirring right now.

Hardly "irony" more as you say just "stirring". A little pointless but perhaps mildly amusing to the psychologically flawed on here, probably worthy of being posted on "BigFooty".

twosheds wrote:

Grahaml wrote:Irony lost on you a bit, buddy?

PS, not sure if you've noticed but I'm not playing. I don't need to get back to basics at all. In fact, I think I'm in pretty good form with my stirring right now.

Hardly "irony" more as you say just "stirring". A little pointless but perhaps mildly amusing to the psychologically flawed on here, probably worthy of being posted on "BigFooty".

Now that's what I call an arguement